Intravenous Cannulation Using Vein Display Instrument and Without Using Vein Display Instrument in Pediatric Patients

October 26, 2017 updated by: Aries Perdana, Indonesia University

Comparison Between Using Vein Display Instrument and Without Using Vein Display Instrument for Successful Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients

This study aims to compare intravenous cannulation success rate between using vein display instrument and without using vein display instrument in pediatric patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approval from Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia was acquired prior conducting the study. Parents' subjects were given informed consent before enrolling the study. After doing asepsis and antisepsis procedure and putting on the tourniquet the first group would get intravenous cannulation without vein displaying instrument. While for the second group, after doing asepsis procedure and tourniquet was put on, a vein display instrument was used to choose the vein. Intravenous cannulation was done after antiseptic procedure. After blood dripped out of the cannula, cannula was connected to the infusion set. Evaluation was done to assess vein route establishment, canulation attempt number and swelling. Data recorded were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) using Chi-square test or Fisher Exact test. Significant value is p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
      • Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
        • Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects aged 0-5 years old
  • Subjects with difficult vein access (e.g. edema, obesity, chemotherapy history),
  • Subjects whose parents had signed the informed consent
  • Subjects with available vein access locations at the back of either hands.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who had infection signs at the designated vein access location
  • Subjects in need of emergency procedures.

Drop out Criteria:

  • Subjects resigned from the study
  • Subjects rejected any next attempt of intravenous cannulation
  • Subjects who received anesthetic drugs before intravenous cannulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: With vein display instrument
Vein cannulation was done after the vein display instrument displays the veins using infrared
Device: Vein Display Instrument
No Intervention: Without vein display instrument
vein cannulation was done without any vein display instrument

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful first vein cannulation attempt
Time Frame: Day 1
Whether the first vein cannulation attempt successful or not will be recorded
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Indonesia University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aries Perdana, Consultant, Indonesia University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IndonesiaUAnes003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Study Data/Documents

  1. Textbook
    Information comments: Hannallah RS , Verghese ST. Peripheral vascular access. In: Bissonnette B, Anderson BJ, Bosenberg A, Engelhardt T, Mason LJ, Tobias JD, editors. Pediatric Anesthesia. Connecticut: People's Medical Publishing House USA, 2011.p. 1097-102.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Vein Access

Clinical Trials on Vein Display Instrument

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Cameroon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe