- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03075852
Comparision of Retinal Surgery by Three-dimensional Heads-up Display to the Standard Operating Microscope
August 15, 2018 updated by: MidAtlantic Retina
Comparative Analysis of Three-dimensional Heads-up Display Surgical Platform to Standard Operating Microscope for Vitreoretinal Surgery
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study investigating a three dimensional heads up display for retinal surgery and comparing its outcomes and ease of use with the standard operative microscope.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Prospective, cross-sectional, observational study.
Patient are undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment.
In this prospective, single-center, unmasked cross-sectional, observational case series, at minimum of 100 consecutive eyes will undergo 23-, 25-, or 27-gauge 3-port pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the Constellation Vision System (Alcon Laboratories, Hünenberg, Switzerland) using either the NGENUITY 3D HUD surgery platform or standard operating microscope (OPMI Lumera 700 surgical microscope with ReSight (Carl Zeiss AG, Gena, Germany), with 1:1 randomization.
Surgical gauge will be dictated by operating surgeon preference.
Informed consent will be obtained from all patients enrolled in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and all applicable HIPPA regulations.
All surgeries will be digitally recorded (as is routinely done for educational purposes) and video data will be stored on password-protected, encrypted external hard-disk drives.
These drives will be stored in a secure, locked cabinet in the Research Department of the Retina Service when not in use.
All surgeries will be performed by 2 surgeons (AH and JH).
Those randomized to 3D HUD surgery will undergo PPV with a 3D high dynamic range camera (ICM5), specialized image processing software (Version 9.5.4;
TrueWare, Santa Barbara, CA), and a 46" high-definition (1980x1024 pixel) liquid crystal display (GD-463D10, Yokohama, Japan).
During surgery with the 3D HUD, the surgeon will wear passive 3-D polarized glasses and will be positioned approximately 1.5 m from the display.
Iris aperture and image gain will be standardized and unchanged for all cases performed with the 3D HUD.
Enrolled patients will be monitored at post-operative day 1, week 1, month 1, and month 3 to measure visual acuity, undergo optical coherence tomography (OCT) if clinically indicated, and further examination to document anterior segment and dilated funduscopic examination findings.
Patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal for either macular pucker or macular hole repair will be subjected to a disease-specific surgical protocol to examine potential differences in macular surgery between 3D HUD and traditional microscope visualization.
These patients will undergo 25-gauge 3-port PPV with 1:1 randomization to either visualization with the 3D HUD or standard operating microscope.
Indocyanine green (ICG) vital dye (**% solution) will be injected in 0.1 cc aliquots to stain the ILM with the infusion cannula clamped and 60 seconds allowed for the dye to stain the ILM.
Endoillumination levels will initially be set to 1% and will be increased by 1% intervals until the operating surgeon notes enough illumination to proceed with ERM/ILM peeling.
ILM peeling will be performed to the boundaries of the retinal vascular arcades and the duration of membrane peeling will be documented.
If the operating surgeon requests increased endoilluminaton power during membrane peeling, the increased value will be recorded.
The number of macular hemorrhages and contusions induced by direct forcep trauma as well as iatrogenic retinal breaks sustained during membrane peeling will also be recorded.
Data Collection Demographic data, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and history will be recorded for each patient on initial examination as is done in the course of routine care.
Data elements will include age, race, date of birth, date of evaluation, medical record number, chief complaint, past ocular history, past medical history, visual acuity, anterior segment exam findings (i.e.
ocular surface disease, lens status, etc.), funduscopic exams, preoperative imaging and testing (OCT, FAF, Fundus Photography).
Intraoperative endoillumination levels will be recorded.
Recorded surgical video files and follow-up status will be compiled for each patient and various metrics will be recorded including total operative time, time of ILM/ERM peeling, number of ICG aliquots required to visualize the ILM, and intraoperative complications.
Baseline and follow up data will also include visual acuity, anterior segment and funduscopic examination, and OCT data if applicable.
Other data collected will include subjective physician surveys on the use of the two visualization systems, including quality of visualization on a 10-point scale, perceived subjective difficulties with vitreoretinal visualization, and overall ergonomic comfort on a 10-point scale.
Human Subjects and Informed Consent The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki will be followed and written informed consent obtained at the time of patient enrollment.
Patients will also be provided with a lay explanation of the study goals and protocol.
The decision to enroll in the study is entirely elective and patients will not be reimbursed for their participation.
The PHI and privacy of subjects will be maintained by strict adherence to HIPPA and Wills Eye Institute policies.
The aforementioned data will be stored prospectively as patients are enrolled.
All data upon collection will be coded and de-identified.
Codes will be created for each consecutive patient via a random number generator.
All data will be stored on a computer stored and ecrypted hard drives within an ecrypted password protected Microsoft Excel file only accessible to members of the study team.
De-identified data will be linked to medical record numbers and date of birth.
No other patient identifiers will be recorded
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- MidAtlantic Retina-Wills Eye Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery from the Mid Altantic Retina, Wills Eye location office, for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible patients are those age 18 or older undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for a variety of indications including, but not limited to, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole, vitreous opacities, vitreous hemorrhage, aphakia, dislocated or displaced intraocular or crystalline lens, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional retinal detachment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prisoners, institutionalized patients, and those who have undergone previous pars plana vitrectomy will be excluded. Patients undergoing combined, simultaneous scleral buckle placement and pars plana vitrectomy will also be excluded
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
3D VRS Patients
Those who undergo surgery with NGENUITY (3D VRS-Vitreoretinal surgery)
|
Patient undergoes VR surgery with visualization using heads up display 3D monitor viewed by the operating surgeon.
Other Names:
|
|
Standard operating microscope
Those who undergo surgery with the standard operating microscope
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative complications
Time Frame: day of surgery
|
Intraoperative complications including: increased surgical time, needing to switch to standard operating microscope, increased time for ILM/ ELM peeling
|
day of surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
|
Snellen
|
baseline and 3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraoperative time
Time Frame: day of surgery
|
Duration of surgery
|
day of surgery
|
|
Ease of use score
Time Frame: day of surgery
|
Physician ease-of-use score on a 10 point scale to quantify usability of 3D HUD and standard operating scope.
|
day of surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 26, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 8, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
August 8, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 6, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
August 17, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 15, 2018
Last Verified
August 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17-609E
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Comparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR Surgery
-
Anna Rita Daniele, MDAlcon ResearchCompletedComparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryItaly
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfOregon Health and Science University; CSEM Centre Suisse d'Electronique et...WithdrawnComparison of Availability for Prediction of Volume Responsiveness | Comparison of Limits of Agreement for Invasive and Non-invasive Measurement of Stroke Volume VariationGermany
-
Klinik Hirslanden, ZurichUnknownComparison of 3D Monitored Changes of Left Atrial Volume Before and After Ablation With Conventional Transesophageal EchocardiographySwitzerland
-
Ain Shams UniversityActive, not recruitingComparison Between Perfusion Index and Pulse Pressure Variability for Prediction of Intravascular Volume During Major Abdominal SurgeriesEgypt
-
University of LiegeUnknownComparison of Treatment for Chronic Non-malignant and Malignant PainBelgium
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownThe Comparison of the I-gel and Endotracheal Tube About in Different Ventilation Settings During Laparoscopic SurgeryTaiwan
-
University of LiegeCompletedComparison of Different Treatment for Chronic Pain
-
Kasr El Aini HospitalCompletedEfficacy of Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tracheal Reconstruction Surgery:Efficiency of Using Ultrasound-guided SCB for Providing Intra and Postoperative Analgesiatracheal Reconstruction SurgeryEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityMohamed, Ahmed A., M.D.; Laila Halim Doss; Ahmed Zaghloul Fouad; Michael Zarif...CompletedComparison of Thoracic Paravertebral Block to Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Breast SurgeryEgypt
-
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesRecruitingClinical Efficacy of Submucosal Dexamethasone and Oral Trypsin Chymotrypsin for Reduction of Postoperative Sequelae After Lower Third Molar SurgeryNepal
Clinical Trials on Heads- Up Display Surgery
-
SG Devices LLCNational Institutes of Health (NIH); University of MinnesotaNot yet recruiting
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity of Manchester; University of Strathclyde; Edinburgh Napier University and other collaboratorsCompletedDepression | Stroke | Anxiety | CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)United Kingdom
-
Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompleted
-
University of AlbertaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Alberta Innovates Health Solutions and other collaboratorsCompletedPediatric ObesityCanada
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityUniversity of Nottingham; University of Manchester; University of Strathclyde; Edinburgh... and other collaboratorsCompletedDepression | Stroke | Anxiety | Cerebrovascular Accident Due to Cerebral Artery OcclusionUnited Kingdom
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityCompletedDepression | Stroke | Anxiety | CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident)United Kingdom
-
Anna Rita Daniele, MDAlcon ResearchCompletedComparison of 3D Visualization and Microscope for VR SurgeryItaly
-
Carnegie Mellon UniversityU.S. National Science FoundationTerminated
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterWithdrawnDiagnostics for the Treatment of Progressive Mucosal Lesions of the Oral Cavity: a Prospective StudyChromosomal Instability | Low Grade Dysplasia Oral Cavity | Loss of Heterozygostiy | Fluorescence In Situ HybridizationNetherlands
-
Centro Cardiologico MonzinoAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma; Policlinico SS Annunziata di ChietiActive, not recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve ProlapseItaly