The Effects on Major Organ Complications on Esophagectomy of New Anesthetic ERAS Strategy: a Prospective Investigation (ERAS)

June 2, 2017 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

The Effects on Major Organ Complications on Esophagectomy of New Anesthetic ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) Strategy: a Prospective Investigation

The goals of this study are to testify the effectiveness on enhancement recovery by new anesthetic ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ERAS (Enhanced recovery after surgery) strategy is extremely important for patients receiving esophagectomy including the preoperative preparation (smoking cessation, exercise prescription and nutrition prescription), intraoperative management, and postoperative analgesia and respiratory rehabilitation. However, despite the less invasive thoracoscopic esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric tube reconstruction was developed, respiratory complications including acute lung injury (ALI) were observed up to 20% and associate with 50% of mortality. A new preventive anesthetic ERAS strategy including precise perioperative fluid management and preventive management after tracheal extubation should be developed.

Previous report indicated that none of the variables studied except fluid administration were shown as a risk factor for the development of respiratory complications on the multivariate analysis on esophageal surgery. However, there are rare prospective investigations of perioperative fluid administration strategy on postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Our group has studied on goal-directed fluid optimization and we found that the goal of optimization may differ for specific surgery. For esophagectomy, new anesthetic ERAS strategy should include precise preoptimized circulatory management and aggressive postoperative pulmonary care. Based on Frank-Starling law (stroke volume, SV, response to fluid therapy), a precise goal for perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) becomes possible in anesthetic practice. However, the effects of preoperative maximization of SV remain unknown. Following our study in last year, we planned to randomize 120 esophagectomy patients in the following 3 years into different GDFT groups (SV maximization and SV normalization groups). Postoperative THRIVE (Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange) therapy will be take place immediately after tracheal extubation. Blood samples will be obtained preoperatively to postoperative day 1 to measure lung injuries, kidney injuries as well as the inflammatory and oxidative markers. The clinical records will be collected (including extubation time, ICU stay, hospitalization days, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, readmission, postoperative cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal complications, gastric tube related complications etc. ). The goals of this study are to testify the effectiveness on enhance recovery by new anesthetic ERAS strategy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Test2
      • Taipei, Test2, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with esophageal cancer
  • Patients will undergo video-assisted thoracic surgical (VATS) esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric tube reconstruction

Exclusion criteria:

  • History of arrhythmia
  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • With poor lung function test (FEV1 < 70% or FEV1/ forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70% of predicted)
  • Preoperative creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fluid therapy optimization
Fluid loading to optimize stroke volume after induction.
colloid 250 mL bolus to increase stroke volume index (SVI). If the increase of SVI is more than 10% of baseline, repeat the bolus. If the increase of SVI is less than 10% of baseline, stop the bolus.
No Intervention: Fluid therapy normalization
No fluid loading after induction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: within 1 year after operation
Length of ICU stay, total hospitalization days, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, postoperative pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, renal complications, prolonged extubation, readmission, gastric tube related complications
within 1 year after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kidney injuries
Time Frame: Preoperative to postoperative day 1
Elevated plasma creatinine
Preoperative to postoperative day 1
Lung injuries
Time Frame: Preoperative to postoperative day 1
Change in the (PF ratio): ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2)
Preoperative to postoperative day 1
Inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Preoperative to postoperative day 1
Change in cytokines
Preoperative to postoperative day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ya-Jung Cheng, Anesthesiology Department, NTUH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Fluid therapy optimization

Subscribe