Restrictive Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in Colorectal Surgery

May 8, 2018 updated by: Khaled Abdel-Baky Abdel-Rahman, Assiut University

Restrictive Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in Colorectal Surgery: Hemodynamics and Kidney Function Outcomes

Fluid administration during and after surgery is an essential part of postoperative care to maintain the patients' fluid and biochemical balance. Abdominal surgical procedures are associated with dehydration from preoperative fasting, bowel preparation, and intra- and postoperative fluid and electrolyte loss. So, perioperative fluid management has been a topic of much debate over years and has intensified especially over the past several years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The controversies include the type of fluid, the timing of administration and the volume administrated. Following much discussion and ongoing controversy on colloids versus crystalloids and the ideal composition of the various intravenous solutions, the main focus more recently has been on the volume of fluids.

Fluid therapy strategies have been developed and implemented in clinical practice over several decades. The data suggest that aggressive or liberal intraoperative fluid resuscitation is harmful during open abdominal operation, whereas a restrictive fluid protocol has better outcomes, including fewer postoperative complications and a shorter discharge time.

However, a restrictive fluid regimen has several limitations. Overly restricted or inadequate fluid administration may lead to insufficient intravascular volume, tissue hypoperfusion, cellular oxygenation impairment and potential organ dysfunction, prolonged recovery of bowel function, and impair tissue oxygenation, which might ultimately impair wound healing including healing of anastomosis.

Recently, the pleth-variability index (PVI) derived from respiratory variations in peripheral perfusion index (PI) has been suggested to be an effective dynamic indicator of fluid responsiveness. Different from other invasive dynamic indices, PVI provides clinicians with a numerical value obtained non-invasively. PVI is calculated as [(PI max - PI min)/PI max] X 100, where PI max and PI min represent the maximal and the minimal value, respectively, of the plethysmographic perfusion index (PI) over one respiratory cycle. PI is the ratio between pulsatile and non-pulsatile infrared light absorption from the pulse oximeter, and it is physiologically equivalent to the amplitude of the plethysmographic waveform. A PVI value of >13% before volume expansion discriminated between fluid responders and non responders with 81% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71516
        • Assiut Iniversity hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients scheduled for colorectal surgery
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I-II.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. patient refusal.
  2. psychiatric disorders.
  3. pregnancy and lactation.
  4. preexisting neurological dysfunction ( history of cerebrovascular stroke CVS)
  5. Allergy to any protocol medication.
  6. metastatic cancer.
  7. Inflammatory bowel disease.
  8. Coronary artery disease with impaired cardiac function.
  9. Diabetes mellitus.
  10. Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level more than 180 μmol/l).
  11. unexpected intraoperative findings (small bowel obstruction, inoperable).
  12. accidental massive intraoperative haemorrhage.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: restrictive group
restrictive fluid strategy, 6 ml/kg/hour of lactated Ringer, during intraoperative period
restrictive lactated ringers as intraoperative fluid therapy in a dose of 6ml/kg/hour
Other Names:
  • fluid therapy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: conservative group
conservative fluid strategy, 12 ml/kg/hour of lactated Ringer, during intraoperative period
conservative lactated ringers as intraoperative fluid therapy in a dose of 12ml/kg/hour
Other Names:
  • conservative fluid therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (NGAL)
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
NGAL is a renal biomarker for acute kidney injury
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: intraoperative
non invasive measurement of mean arterial blood pressure
intraoperative
heart rate
Time Frame: intraoperative
measurement of heart rate from pulse oximetry
intraoperative
pleth-variability index
Time Frame: intraoperative
derived from respiratory variations in peripheral perfusion index.
intraoperative
incidence of bradycardia
Time Frame: intraoperative
bradycardia defined as heart rate less than 50 beat per minute
intraoperative
incidence of hypotension
Time Frame: intraoperative
hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 40% of baseline value
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Khaled A Abdel-Rahman, MD, Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 3, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23140000178

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fluid Therapy

Clinical Trials on restrictive fluid strategy

Subscribe