VItamin K Inhibition and NeurocoGnition (VIKING) (VIKING)

September 12, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Angers

Use of Vitamin K Antagonist and Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Adults : a Retrospective Study With Exposed and Non-exposed Groups

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether patients usually taking Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) exhibit a poorer global cognitive performance than control patients (matched on age, gender and indication for anticoagulation) taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

The secondary objectives are:

  • to determine whether patients usually taking VKAs are more likely to have moderate to severe cognitive disorders than matched controls taking DOACs.
  • to determine whether VKAs intake is associated with poorer executive functions.
  • to determine on CT scans whether the VKAs intake is associated with a greater volume of vascular calcifications in the brain compared to the use of DOACs.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

VKAs are the most common drugs in the treatment and prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in older adults. Their action is mediated by decrease in the bioavailability of the active form of vitamin K. However, vitamin K participates in brain health and function by regulating the synthesis of sphingolipids, a constituent of the myelin sheath and the neurons membrane, and through the biological activation of vitamin K-dependent proteins (VKDPs) involved in neuron survival. Epidemiological studies have reported a positive association between higher serum vitamin K concentration and better verbal episodic memory performance in older adults, and an inverse association between dietary vitamin K intakes and cognitive complaint/cognitive disorders/behavioral disorders. VKAs, which deplete the active form of vitamin K, may thus be responsible for neurological disorders. CNS abnormalities were observed in newborns exposed in utero to VKA. Similarly, in two cross-sectional studies, the use of VKAs was directly associated with cognitive disorders in older adults, and with a lower volume of gray matter in the hippocampus.

However, the main limitation of these previous studies was that the different associations reported may actually be explained by the thromboembolic pathology justifying the use of VKA such as atrial fibrillation with potential adverse consequences on the brain.

Thus, the use of DOACs could serve as an ideal comparator, as their indications are similar to those of VKAs but which mechanism does not interfere with vitamin K.

The investigators hypothesize that 1) geriatric patients usually taking VKAs may have lower cognitive performance than those usually taking DOACs; 2) there is an association between VKA intake and cognitive performance in geriatric patients, including after adjustment on the indication for anticoagulation; and 3) that geriatric patients usually taking VKAs exhibit brain changes compared to those usually taking DOACs, including greater calcification burden.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49933
        • Angers University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients are recruited in the memory clinic and geriatric day hospital of the University Hospital of Angers, France

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 70 years and over
  • To be seen in consultation or day hospital in the department of geriatrics from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2016
  • Exposed :

    • Patients who have been taking VKA for at least 3 months for atrial fibrillation or pulmonary embolism, with INR between 2 and 3
  • Non-exposed:

    • Patients who have been taking DOAC for at least 3 months for atrial fibrillation or pulmonary embolism
    • Matched on age (± 5 years), gender and indication for anticoagulation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe kidney failure (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min)
  • Language other than French

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Exposed to VKA
VKA intake Patients who have been taking VKA for at least 3 months
Non-exposed to VKA
DOAC intake Patients who have been taking DOAC for at least 3 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the global cognitive performance between geriatric patients exposed and non-exposed to VKA
Time Frame: Baseline
Global cognitive performance is assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of moderate-to-severe dementia diagnosis between geriatric patients exposed and non-exposed to VKA
Time Frame: Baseline
Moderate-to-severe dementia defined as a MMSE score < 20 / 30
Baseline
Comparison of the executive functions between geriatric patients exposed and non-exposed to VKA
Time Frame: Baseline
Executive functioning is assessed by the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score
Baseline
Evaluation of the volume of vascular calcifications in the brain according to the use of VKAs
Time Frame: Baseline
Semi-automated measure of the volume of vascular calcifications in the brain based on CT scan
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017/19

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurocognitive Disorders

3
Subscribe