- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03411148
Targeting Balance Confidence to Increase Community Integration in Users of Prostheses
May 31, 2022 updated by: Noah Rosenblatt, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Targeting Balance Confidence as a Strategy to Increase Integration and Improve Outcomes in Users of Lower-Limb Prostheses
Low balance confidence occurs when an individual perceives they have limited ability to maintain their balance while performing a specific task of daily living.
It is a prevalent problem in lower limb prosthesis users and is a strong predictor of prosthesis use and community participation.
Balance confidence is not necessarily related to functional abilities.
It is possible to improve functional ability as a result of rehabilitation, without concurrently improving balance confidence.
Interventions to address low balance confidence may need to target both functional abilities as well as beliefs regarding these abilities.
The purpose of this study is to test whether, for users of lower limb prostheses, an intervention combining physical therapy exercise to improve function with cognitive behavioral therapy to address fears and thoughts associated with low confidence can improve balance confidence and promote community participation.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Lower limb prosthesis users, with self-reported low balance confidence complete baseline gait analysis and balance testing, as well as a series of validated self-reported outcome scales addressing balance confidence, quality of life, and community integration.
Participants are then provided a step activity monitor (SAM) and a global position sensing (GPS) tracker to be worn for one week, the data from which is linked and used to objectively quantify baseline community participation.
At the conclusion of the one week, participants are randomized to one of two groups, each of which will last for 8 weeks.
At the conclusion of the eight weeks, participants repeat baseline assessments and are again provided a SAM and GPS tracker to wear for one week.
Baseline measures and activity monitoring occur again 8 and 16 weeks thereafter.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
22
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
North Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064
- Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center
-
North Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥18 years
- unilateral lower limb amputation without serious complications
- at least 6 months experience using a definitive lower limb prosthesis
- Activity Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale score≤80
- self-reported concern about balance that limit activities
Exclusion Criteria:
- active wounds on weight bearing surfaces
- inability to perform the protocol without an assistive device
- currently seeing a physical therapist for any reason
- history of neurodegenerative disease
- history of stroke
- ill-fitting or ill-functioning prosthesis (to be verified by research prosthetist during screening)
- prohibited by primary care physician or research physician to participate in mild exercise
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Exercise Group A
Weekly exercise sessions with physical therapist and psychologist
|
Eight weekly sessions integrating techniques from physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy.
At the start of each session participants play virtual reality games that target balance and functional gait and then discuss their balance confidence and activity avoidance behaviors with a behavioural counselor.
Weekly homework assignments ask participants to report on thoughts causing them to avoid activities and to slowly engage in activities that present increasing levels of fear.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Exercise Group B
Home-based exercises
|
Stretching and other exercises are safely taught by physical therapist and then practiced at home following a provided schedule.
Participants receive periodic calls to discuss progress.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Community integration
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
number of steps taken outside of the home
|
24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Social Functioning scale from the 36-item Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The scale measures the extent to which physical and emotional problems interfere with social activities on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating less interference
|
24 weeks
|
|
Role Limitation due to Emotional Problems scale from the Short Form Health Survey (SF36)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The scale measures the extent to which emotional problems interfere with work and daily activities on a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating less interference
|
24 weeks
|
|
Extent of Participation scale from the Measure of Community Reintegration of Servicemembers
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The scale measures community participation in terms of how often an individual engages in certain activities on a score of 10-70 with higher scores indicating greater participation
|
24 weeks
|
|
Perceived Limitation scale from the Measure of Community Reintegration of Servicemembers
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The scale measures self-perceived limitations in community participation n a score of 10-70 with higher scores indicating less limitation
|
24 weeks
|
|
Frenchay Activity Index
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This is a behavioral scale that primarily measures social participation, as well as daily activities on a score of 0-45 with higher scores indicating greater social activity.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in Activity-specific balance confidence scale following the intervention
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
The ABC scale measures balance confidence on a scale of 0-100 with higher values indicating greater confidence
|
8 weeks
|
|
Activity-specific balance confidence scale
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The ABC scale measures balance confidence on a scale of 0-100 with higher values indicating greater confidence.
Measurement at this time point will indicate the lasting impact of the intervention on balance confidence
|
24 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Well-being scale from the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The scale measures overall quality of life on a score of 0-100 with higher scores indicating increased quality of life.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: 8 wks
|
This scale measures measures balance function by assessing the performance of functional tasks.
It is scored from 0-45 with high scores indicating better balance.
|
8 wks
|
|
Change from baseline on L-test performance
Time Frame: 8 wks
|
Participants rise from a chair without armrests, walk 3m, turn right, walk 7m, turn around and trace their path back to the start.
Time to complete the task is noted.
|
8 wks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 5, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
January 26, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 1, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 31, 2022
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- OP160044
- W81XWH-17-1-0697 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defense)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Physical Activity
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityEge UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical Activity Behavior | Physical Activity LevelsTurkey
-
Istinye UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Youth | Physical Activity Barriers | Physical Activity FacilitatorsTurkey
-
Universidad Pedagogica Nacional, ColombiaEnrolling by invitationPhysical Activity | Running | Running Performance | Running Endurance | Physical Activity in Adults | Physical Activity IntensityColombia
-
Istanbul Kültür UniversityWithdrawnPhysical Activity Level | Physical Activity Awareness
-
University of ManitobaResearch ManitobaCompletedPhysical Activity | Physical Activity Self-Definition
-
Universidade do PortoActive, not recruitingPhysical Activity | Physical Fitness | Well BeingPortugal
-
Odense University HospitalUniversity of Southern DenmarkRecruitingQuality of Life | Physical Activity | Physical Disability | Physical Function | ParticipationDenmark
-
Firat UniversityNot yet recruitingUniversity Students | Physical Activity Level | Postural Awareness | Physical Activity AttitudeTurkey
-
Pham Ngoc Thach University of MedicineCompletedModerate Physical Activity (MPA) | Vigorous Physical Activity (VPA) | Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) | Total of Sleep Time (TST)Vietnam
-
Georgetown UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedPhysical Activity | Motor ActivityUnited States
Clinical Trials on Weekly exercise sessions with physical therapist and psychologist
-
Centre Hospitalier Departemental VendeeRecruiting
-
University of MiamiThe Applebaum FoundationRecruitingBreast Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Population Health Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Completed
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompletedOccupational HealthHong Kong
-
Herlev HospitalRecruitingTransient Ischemic Attack | Non-disabling Stroke | Minor StrokeDenmark
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; National Institute for Health Research, United...Recruiting
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Stress | Chronic Disease | Health Promotion | Mental Health Wellness 1 | Health BehaviorCanada
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteCancer and Aging Research GroupCompletedLymphoma | Leukemia | MyelomaUnited States
-
Universitat Jaume IRecruitingProlonged Grief Disorder (PGD)Spain