Effectiveness and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light in Patients With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

June 18, 2019 updated by: Yonrawee Piyacomn, M.D., FICO, Chulalongkorn University

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common causes of dry eye diseases. Over the past decade, several treatment options in MGD have been extensively studied including warm compression, lid hygiene, ocular lubricants, forceful expression, LipiFlow thermal pulsation system, intraductal probing, debridement scaling and intense pulsed light (IPL). IPL is a broad spectrum, non-coherent and polychromatic light source with a wavelength spectrum of 500-1200 nm. It can be filtered to allow only a range of wavelengths to be emitted. Different wavelength makes different depth of tissue to absorb a specific light energy. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been widely used in dermatology as a therapeutic tool for removal of hypertrichosis, benign cavernous hemangioma, benign venous malformations, telangiectasia, port-wine stain and pigmented lesions. Concurrent ocular surface improvements have been observed in patients undergone IPL treatment. Very few prospective clinical trials showed that subjective dry eye symptoms decreased and some of the dry eye signs also improved. Nonetheless, there is still inconsistency in the efficacy of IPL among these studies. Biomarkers, specifically cytokines, in dry eye diseases have been studied to some extent. Moreover, the change in ocular surface inflammatory cytokines in patients with MGD after IPL treatment is unclear.

The investigators proposed a prospective randomized double-masked sham-controlled clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of intense pulse light in MGD patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Yonrawee Piyacomn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Able to read, understand and sign an informed consent form
  2. 18-80 years of age
  3. Fitzpatrick skin type 1-5
  4. Able and willing to comply with the treatment /follow-up schedule and requirements
  5. Presence of meibomian gland on each lower eyelid's meibography
  6. Current diagnosis of stage1-4 of MGD in both eyes, according to the International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Report of the Subcommittee on Management and Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contact lens wearer within the past 1 month and throughout the study
  2. Recent ocular surgery or eyelid surgery within the past 6 months
  3. Neuro-paralysis in the planned treatment area within the past 6 months
  4. Current use of punctual plugs
  5. Pre-cancerous lesions, skin cancer or pigmented lesions in the planned treatment area
  6. Uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled immunosuppressive diseases
  7. Subjects who have undergone refractive surgery within the past 6 months
  8. Diseases in the planned treatment area that could be stimulated by light at 560 nm to 1200 nm (e.g.,Herpes simplex 1 and 2, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, porphyria)
  9. Use of photosensitive medications and/or herbs that may cause sensitivity to 560-1200 nm light exposure, such as isotretinoin, tetracycline, or St. John's Wort
  10. Pregnancy and lactation
  11. Radiation therapy to the head or neck within the past year, or planned radiation therapy throughout study period
  12. Treatment with chemotherapeutic agent within the past 8 weeks, or planned chemotherapy throughout study period
  13. Any condition revealed during the eligibility screening process whereby the physician deems the subject inappropriate for this study
  14. Declared legally blind in one eye
  15. IPL treatment within the past 12 months
  16. Lipiflow treatment, or any equivalent treatments, within the past 12 months
  17. Any anti-glaucomatous eye drop uses within the past 3 months and throughout the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: IPL group
IPL 9-13 J/cm2 according to Fitzpatrick's skin type on day 0, 15, 45
E> Eye (E-SWIN, Paris, France) IPL machine
warm compression, lid scrub and non-preservative ocular lubricants
SHAM_COMPARATOR: sham-IPL group
IPL 0 J/cm2 according to Fitzpatrick's skin type on day 0, 15, 45
warm compression, lid scrub and non-preservative ocular lubricants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fluorescein tear break-up time at month 6 using fluorescein technique
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
time elapsed from the last complete eyelid blink until appearance of the first dry spot on the cornea
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in dry eye symptoms using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a questionnaire, at month 6
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
a 12-item questionnaire designed to provide a rapid assessment of the symptoms of ocular irritation consistent with dry eye disease and their impact on vision-related functioning.
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in lipid layer thickness at month 6 using LipiView interferometer (TearScience inc., Morrisville,NC)
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
quantitative values of the tear-film lipid layer depth or thickness by imaging the surface contour of the tear film, lipid layer thickness measurement
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in Meibomian gland's anatomy by Meiboscore using Meibography at month 6 using Keratograph 5M (OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany)
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
directly visualising the morphology of meibomian glands in vivo
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in ocular surface staining at month 6 using fluorescein staining technique
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
fluorescein dye which is a mildly invasive stain that marks the tear film and defects in the corneal and conjunctival epithelium. The investigators use National Eye Institute (NEI) grading for ocular surface staining score in this study
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in Meibomian gland expressibility at month 6 after applying the force onto the eyelids using meibomian gland evaluator
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
number of glands expressible after applying force onto the eyelids
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in Meibum quality at month 6 after applying the force onto the eyelids using meibomian gland evaluator
Time Frame: day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
quality of the meibum content after applying the force onto the eyelids
day 0, 15, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in tear osmolarity at month 6 using TearLab Osmolarity System (San Diego, CA)
Time Frame: day 0, 45, month 3, month 6
concentration of the tear : The investigators use TearLab Osmolarity System (San Diego, CA)
day 0, 45, month 3, month 6
Change in tear production test (Schirmer's test) at month 3 using calibrated strips of a non-toxic filter paper
Time Frame: day 0, month 3
is used determine whether the lacrimal glands produce enough tears to keep the eyes adequately moist
day 0, month 3
Change in tear cytokines Interleukins-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) at month 3 using Bio-Plex® 200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)
Time Frame: day 0, month 3
one of the tear inflammatory cytokines
day 0, month 3
Change in tear cytokines Interleukins-6 at month 3 using Bio-Plex® 200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)
Time Frame: day 0, month 3
one of the tear inflammatory cytokines
day 0, month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yonrawee Piyacomn, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 3, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe