Hypofractionated Boost vs Conventionally Fractionated Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer

March 6, 2022 updated by: Dr. Patrick Cheung

Randomized Trial of Concomitant Hypofractionated IMRT Boost Versus Conventional Fractionated IMRT Boost for Localized High Risk Prostate Cancer

Randomized trial comparing 2 external beam radiotherapy fractionation schemes in patients with localized high risk prostate cancer. Primary endpoint is acute toxicity.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients enrolled onto this study will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms:

  • Standard fractionation: Using 2 sequential IMRT plans, the pelvic lymph nodes and prostate will initially be treated to 46 Gy in 23 fractions, followed by a subsequent boost to the prostate to a total dose of 78 Gy.
  • Hypofractionation: Using a one phase IMRT plan, the pelvic lymph nodes will be treated to a dose of 48 Gy in 25 fractions, while the prostate will be treated to a dose of 68 Gy in 25 fractions concomitantly (simulataneous integrated boost).

In addition, all patients receive 1.5- 3 years of androgen deprivation therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

178

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent obtained.
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
  • T1-2 N0 M0, Gleason Score <= 7, PSA 20 - 100
  • T1-2 N0 M0, Gleason Score 8 - 10, PSA <= 100
  • T3 N0 M0, any Gleason Score, PSA <= 100

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral hip replacement.
  • Patients with active collagen vascular disease.
  • Patients with active inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Patients with previous radiotherapy to the pelvis.
  • Patients with ataxia telangiectasia.
  • Patients with nodal or distant metastases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Fractionation
Using 2 sequential IMRT plans, the pelvic lymph nodes and prostate will initially be treated to 46 Gy in 23 fractions, followed by a subsequent boost to the prostate to a total dose of 78 Gy.
Experimental: Hypofractionation
Using a one phase IMRT plan, the pelvic lymph nodes will be treated to a dose of 48 Gy in 25 fractions, while the prostate will be treated to a dose of 68 Gy in 25 fractions concomitantly (simulataneous integrated boost).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Toxicity
Time Frame: within 3 months after starting radiotherapy
Proportion of patients experiencing grade >=2 acute toxicity
within 3 months after starting radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Late Toxicity
Time Frame: beyond 3 months of starting radiotherapy
Proportion of patients experiencing grade >= 2 late toxicity
beyond 3 months of starting radiotherapy
Biochemical Control (Phoenix Definition)
Time Frame: at 5 years
Actuarial measure of patients failing biochemically (defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/mL)
at 5 years
Overall Survival
Time Frame: at 5 years
Actuarial measure of patients being alive
at 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Patrick Cheung, MD, Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Conventionally Fractionated versus Hypofractionated Boost

3
Subscribe