Trial Evaluating Hypo-fractionated Accelerated Versus Conventional Fractionated Adjuvant RT in Head & Neck Malignancies (Radiotherapy)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Aman Sharma, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

The HYPCON 3 Trial A Phase II/III Randomized Study Evaluating Hypo-fractionated Accelerated Versus Conventional Fractionated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Malignancies

Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy reduces the OTT (overall treatment time) which may in turn reduce rapid accelerated repopulation of clonogenic cells during waiting period after surgery. If this holds true, there is a potential to achieve better loco-regional control in with PORT for HNSCC. There is a strong radiobiological and economic rationale for delivery hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in HNSCC. The HYPCON III trial will be aimed to reduce the number of fractions by 50% (30 fr to 15 fr)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current standard radiotherapy regimen for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in the post operative setting is 60-66Gy in 30-33# delivered in 6 weeks with 5 fractions delivered per week. The aim of this study is to test whether a resource sparing, 3weeks, 15 fraction course of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy is non inferior to the conventional fractionation regimen delivering 30 fractions over6 weeks of post operative radiotherapy (PORT). Hypofractionation is already the standard of care in the treatment of cancers like breast cancer which has evolved from 50 Gy in 25 # to 40 Gy in 15# and finally to 26Gy in 5 # with similar tumor control rates and toxicity profiles.

Hypofractionation has shown promising results in prostate, lung cancer and CNS tumors. Hypofractionation has been initially explored in palliative setting for HNSCC. Unlike 2 dimensional RT deliver, recent past has seen a rapid evolution of RT delivery techniques like 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), image guided radiotherapy (IGRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). It is now possible to spare adjoining critical organs at risk which make delivery of hypo-fractionated feasible for HNSCC. Recently, the IAEA multicentric trial in radical setting for HNSCC has proved equivalent results in term of both disease control and toxicity with delivery of hypo-fractionated RT. Shorter treatment time is more convenient to the patient. The reduction in the number of fractions required per patient will help in optimal unitization of radiotherapy resources, especially in a low/moderate income country like India where the burden of cancer hugely surpasses the resource availability. Hypo-fractionated schedules have potential to provide attractive cost benefits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

369

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Jhajjar, Haryana, India
        • Recruiting
        • Dr. Aman Sharma, Associate Professor, Radiation Oncology, NCI, AIIMS
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with pT1-4 squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity/ oropharynx/ larynx/ hypopharynx with any of the intermediate risk features:

    • Positive lymph node (s)
    • Perineural invasion
    • Lympho-vascular invasion
    • Close margins
  • Age 18-80yrs
  • ECOG performance status 0-1at time of surgery
  • Informed consent
  • Available FOR long term follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk factors following resection: positive-margin(s)and/or extra nodal extension (ENE)
  • pT1-2disease and no high-risk features (LVSI, PNI, Close margins,pN0)
  • Patients receiving Neo-adjuvant or concurrent Chemotherapy
  • Non-Squamous Histology
  • Distant metastasis
  • Synchronous or second primary malignancy outside of the oropharynx, oral cavity, larynx and hypopharynx
  • Pregnant females or nursing mothers due to the probability of congenital anomalies and potential of this regimen to harm nursing infants.
  • Prior Radiotherapy to head and neck region

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard conventionally fractionated PORT Arm A
hypo-fractionated PORT Arm B
60Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks (5 fractions per week)
Experimental: Hypo-fractionated PORT Arm B
4Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks (5 fractions per week)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
loco-regional control at 24 months
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years
longitudinal assessment every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
2 years
Quality of life EORTC QLQ C30
Time Frame: 2 years

EORTC QLQC30 module [longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months] The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items.

Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

2 years
swallowing function
Time Frame: 2 years
using MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory pre RT, post RT, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
2 years
Disease free survival
Time Frame: 2 years
longitudinal assessment every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months
2 years
Quality of life H&N 35
Time Frame: 2 years
EORTC H&N 35 module [longitudinal assessment at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months] The head & neck cancer module incorporates seven multi-item scales that assess pain, swallowing, senses (taste and smell), speech, social eating, social contact and sexuality. There are also eleven single items. For all items and scales (maximum score 100 and minimum score 0), high scores indicate more problems (i.e. there are no function scales in which high scores would mean better functioning). The scoring approach for the QLQ-H&N35 is identical in principle to that for the symptom scales / single items of the QLQ-C30.
2 years
RTOG Acute Toxicity Post Radiation therapy
Time Frame: 90 days

Acute toxicity is the side effects that appear within 90 days after the radiation therapy and will be assessed using RTOG acute toxicity scale with grading from 0 to IV where 0 represents no findings and IV being the worst Findings. Higher values will be showing worsening of the condition.

it will be scored weekly during radiation.

90 days
RTOG Late toxicity post radiation therapy
Time Frame: 2 years

late toxicity is the side effects that appear after 90 days following the radiation therapy and will be assessed using RTOG Late Radiation Morbidity Grading (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) with maximum value of 4 showing very severe / disabling and minimum value of 0 showing no toxicity. Higher values will be showing worsening of the condition.

longitudinal assessment will be done every 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months

2 years
Late Toxicity using LENT- SOMA scale
Time Frame: 12 months

using the Late effects in normal tissues- subjective, objective, management, analytic (LENT SOMA) scale.

assessment will be done at 3-, 6-and 12 months posttreatment.

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Aman Sharma, National cancer Institute, AIIMS, Jhajjar

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Head and Neck Cancer (HNSCC)

Clinical Trials on Standard conventionally fractionated PORT

Subscribe