Comparing Effectiveness of Duloxetine and Desipramine in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Pragmatic Trial Using Point of Care Randomization

October 22, 2025 updated by: Vafi Salmasi, Stanford University
Over 100 million Americans suffer from chronic pain resulting in annual cost of roughly $635 billion. Limited treatments are available for this widespread disease. The data supporting these treatments lack generalizability to patients with more serious medical and psychological comorbidities who are often excluded from explanatory efficacy trials. Our work aims to integrate randomized comparative effectiveness research with patient care. The investigators will randomize the patients and collect data using an open-source learning healthcare system already in use in our department to monitor patients' progress: Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry (CHOIR). Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry uses the National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System item banks for comparative metrics through computer adaptive testing. The investigators will leverage the advantage of this novel system to compare effectiveness of duloxetine and desipramine in decreasing pain in patients with chronic pain. The investigators will also compare adherence of patients to these two commonly used medications over a period of six months. This will evaluate feasibility of integrating randomized comparative effectiveness research with patient care in subspecialty clinics. Collaborative Health Outcomes Information Registry can then be applied for numerous future trials to advance our knowledge in perioperative and pain medicine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Redwood City, California, United States, 94063
        • Stanford Pain Management Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Age of 18 years old or above
  2. Persistent pain for more than 3 months
  3. Candidate for treatment by anti-depressant based on treating pain provider

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Prior failure of duloxetine and/or desipramine (patients who have failed other TCAs or SNRIs can be considered for the trial based on the reason for previous medication failure)
  2. Contraindication to taking duloxetine or desipramine
  3. Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Duloxetine
Duloxetine starting at 20 mg per day and increasing to 60 mg per day as tolerated.
Open label prescription
Other Names:
  • Cymbalta
Experimental: Desipramine
Desipramine starting at 25 mg per day and increasing to 75 mg per day as tolerated.
Open label prescription
Other Names:
  • Norpramin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
Percent of participants in each arm that had more than 30% reduction in pain intensity. Participants rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 to 10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable).
baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Function
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for physical function. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to better function.
Baseline and 6 months
Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for pain interference. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse pain interference.
Baseline and 6 months
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for depression. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe depression.
Baseline and 6 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
National Institute of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Standardized score for anxiety. Raw scores were converted to T-scores with a population mean of 50 with standard deviation of 10. Overall score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more severe anxiety.
Baseline and 6 months
Adherence
Time Frame: Monthly for 6 months
Number of participants who completed 6-month therapy based on prescription records.
Monthly for 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vafi Salmasi, MD., Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 24, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe