NGS Strategy Effectiveness in Molecular Diagnosis

June 14, 2018 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

The coming out of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies, with documented advantages and reduced costs respect to Sanger sequencing, has provided new appealing approaches to diagnostic testing. Despite this, its use for routine diagnostic purposes requires certification in terms of reliability, as well as a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

To test the feasibility of using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) in clinical diagnosis, we assessed its performance to detect point mutations and big rearrangements previously identified with standard techniques. The diagnostic accuracy and the cost-effectiveness will be evaluated by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) analyses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 400 DNA samples coming from MO and OI patients (including either dominant and recessive forms) will be included in the study (250 affected by MO and 150 by OI).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Multiple Osteochondroma
  • Clinical diagnosis of Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MO patients
OI patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the accuracy of the Ion Torrent PGM platform for genetic variant detection (Diagnostic sensitivity evaluation)
Time Frame: at 30 months
The accuracy of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome (PGM) to identify disease-causing mutations in patients affected by Multiple Osteochondromas (MO) and Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) needs to be validated for its routine diagnostic clinical use. To asses this, we will compare results obtained with the new NGS approach with those previously obtained with standard techniques (DHPLC/Sanger + MLPA) in a number of MO and OI patients.
at 30 months
HTA analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness, organizational and social implications of a screening strategy based on the IonPGM platform
Time Frame: at 36 months
To demonstrate the pertinence in the use of this innovative technology in health care, we will examine the medical, social and economic implications according with Health Technology Assessment (HTA), a multi-disciplinary field of policy analysis applied to many different health care technologies before their diffusion and use. HTA aims at evaluating the real effectiveness of medical interventions, their proper use, access criteria and qualitative improvements, the clinical and organizational benefits, therefore suggesting how to manage, promote and discourage them.
at 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta

Clinical Trials on NGS molecular screening

Subscribe