- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03118570
A Study in Adult Patients With Type I, III or IV Osteogenesis Imperfecta Treated With BPS804 (Asteroid)
June 29, 2023 updated by: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
A Phase 2b, Multicentre, Multinational, Double-blind, Dose-finding Study, Incorporating an Open Label Substudy, in Adult Patients With Type I, III or IV Osteogenesis Imperfecta Treated With Setrusumab (BPS804)
The purpose of this study is to select a suitable dose of BPS804 by measuring the strength/quality of bone using a special type of CT scanner.
Participants will be treated for 12 months and followed up for a further 12 months.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study was previously posted by Mereo Biopharma and was transferred to Ultragenyx in February 2021.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
112
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
-
-
-
Aarhus, Denmark
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
Odense, Denmark
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
-
-
-
Lyon, France
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
Paris, France
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Paris Cedex 14
-
Paris, Paris Cedex 14, France
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bristol, United Kingdom
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
London, United Kingdom
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Cambridgeshire
-
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Newcastle
-
Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, United Kingdom
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Oxfordshire
-
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 012115
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Minnesota
-
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States, 55101
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15225
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Mereo Investigator Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of OI Type I, III or IV with a confirmed defect in the COL1A1/COL1A2 genes, as confirmed by genetic testing
- One or more fractures in the past 5 years
- Capable of giving signed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of skeletal malignancies or other bone diseases (other than OI)
- History of neural foraminal stenosis (except if due to scoliosis)
- History of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack
- History of endocrine or thyroid/parathyroid conditions that could affect bone metabolism
- Treatment with bisphosphonates within 3 months of randomisation
- Treatment with teraparatide, denosumab or other anabolic/anti-reabsorptive medications within 6 months of randomisation
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Setrusumab 20 mg/kg (Blinded)
Setrusumab 20 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion once a month for 12 months plus 500 mg calcium oral tablets and 800 IU vitamin D capsules.
|
Intravenous infusion
Other Names:
tablets
capsules
Following completion of the study treatment (Month 12) participants can receive an optional single dose of zoledronic acid.
Participants can receive an optional further dose of zoledronic acid at Month 18 at the discretion of their treating physician.
|
|
Experimental: Setrusumab 8 mg/kg (Blinded)
Setrusumab 8 mg/kg IV infusion once a month for 12 months plus 500 mg calcium oral tablets and 800 IU vitamin D capsules.
|
Intravenous infusion
Other Names:
tablets
capsules
Following completion of the study treatment (Month 12) participants can receive an optional single dose of zoledronic acid.
Participants can receive an optional further dose of zoledronic acid at Month 18 at the discretion of their treating physician.
|
|
Experimental: Setrusumab 2 mg/kg (Blinded)
Setrusumab 2 mg/kg IV infusion once a month for 12 months plus 500 mg calcium oral tablets and 800 IU vitamin D capsules.
|
Intravenous infusion
Other Names:
tablets
capsules
Following completion of the study treatment (Month 12) participants can receive an optional single dose of zoledronic acid.
Participants can receive an optional further dose of zoledronic acid at Month 18 at the discretion of their treating physician.
|
|
Experimental: Setrusumab 20 mg/kg (Open-Label)
Setrusumab 20 mg/kg IV infusion once a month for 12 months plus 500 mg calcium oral tablets and 800 IU vitamin D capsules.
|
Intravenous infusion
Other Names:
tablets
capsules
Following completion of the study treatment (Month 12) participants can receive an optional single dose of zoledronic acid.
Participants can receive an optional further dose of zoledronic acid at Month 18 at the discretion of their treating physician.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo IV infusion once a month for 12 months plus 500 mg calcium oral tablets and 800 IU vitamin D capsules.
|
tablets
capsules
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Radial Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (Tr vBMD) at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (end of treatment [EOT])
|
Assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT).
HRpQCT scans were performed on the participant's distal non-dominant arm.
In cases of an arm that had been supported with rods or had significant deformity, the dominant limb was selected.
Data presents the ratio of the means between the visit and Baseline from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
|
Baseline, Month 12 (end of treatment [EOT])
|
|
Change From Baseline in Radial Bone Strength (Failure Load) at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
Assessed by finite element analysis (FEA) of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Radial Bone Strength (Stiffness) at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
Assessed by FEA of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Tr VBMD Over Time: Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
Assessed by HRpQCT.
HRpQCT scans were performed on the participant's distal non-dominant arm.
In cases of an arm that had been supported with rods or had significant deformity, the dominant limb was selected.
Data presented is the ratio of the means between the Visit and Baseline from ANCOVA.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Tr VBMD at Months 6 and 12: Open-Label Arm
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
Assessed by HRpQCT.
HRpQCT scans were performed on the participant's distal non-dominant arm.
In cases of an arm that had been supported with rods or had significant deformity, the dominant limb was selected.
Data presented is the ratio of the means between the Visit and Baseline from ANCOVA.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Bone Strength (Failure Load) Over Time: Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
Assessed by FEA of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Bone Strength (Failure Load) at Months 6 and 12: Open-Label Arm
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
Assessed by FEA of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Bone Strength (Stiffness) Over Time: Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
Assessed by FEA of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, 24
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Radial and Tibial Bone Strength (Stiffness) at Months 6 and 12: Open-Label Arm
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
Assessed by FEA of models generated from HRpQCT images of the distal radius.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Fracture (Peripheral, Vertebral, Long-Bone, Any) at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12 (EOT)
|
Fracture assessment, confirmed by central radiographic reading, was carried out for peripheral including all major long bones, minor bone (digits, ribs) and vertebral fractures.
Fractures without clinical symptoms, detected only by means of radiographic investigations, were not included in the analysis.
|
Month 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lumbar, Total Body, and Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-score at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
BMD was evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
T-Score was calculated based on actual measured bone density value.
T-scores are standardized scores that reflect the standard deviations (SDs) above/below the normal mean for young adults.
A score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10.
A positive change in DXA T-score indicates an improvement in BMD.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lumbar, Total Body, and Femoral Neck BMD at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
BMD was evaluated by DXA.
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lumbar, Total Body, and Femoral Neck BMD T-score at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
BMD was evaluated by DXA.
T-Score was calculated based on actual measured bone density value.
T-scores are standardized scores that reflect the standard deviations (SDs) above/below the normal mean for young adults.
A score of 50 indicates the population mean with a standard deviation of 10.
A positive change in DXA T-score indicates an improvement in BMD.
|
Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lumbar, Total Body, and Femoral Neck BMD at Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
BMD was evaluated by DXA.
|
Baseline, Month 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Total vBMD (Radial and Tibial) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, and 24
|
Assessed by HRpQCT.
HRpQCT scans were performed on the participant's distal non-dominant arm.
In cases of an arm that had been supported with rods or had significant deformity, the dominant limb was selected.
Data presented is the ratio of the means between the Visit and Baseline from ANCOVA.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, and 24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cortical vBMD (Radial and Tibial) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, and 24
|
Assessed by HRpQCT.
HRpQCT scans were performed on the participant's distal non-dominant arm.
In cases of an arm that had been supported with rods or had significant deformity, the dominant limb was selected.
Data presented is the ratio of the means between the Visit and Baseline from ANCOVA.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT), 18, and 24
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Body Height, Weight and Body Mass Index (BMI) at 6 and 12 Months: Full Analysis Set
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 (EOT)
|
Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 (EOT)
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in Lean and Fat Body Mass From Whole Body at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
Lean and fat body mass was evaluated using whole body DXA (including the head).
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Amino-Terminal Propeptide of Type 1 Procollagen (P1NP) up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (EOT)
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (EOT)
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in Carboxy-Terminal Telo-Peptide [CTX-1] up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (EOT)
|
Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 (EOT)
|
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
The SF-12 is a generic, 12-item survey that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
It yields scale scores for each of these 8 domains and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health: The Physical Component Summary and the Mental Component Summary.
The total score for the Physical Component Summary ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better physical functioning.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in SF-12 Mental Component Summary Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
The SF-12 is a generic, 12-item survey that measures 8 domains of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health.
It yields scale scores for each of these 8 domains and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health: The Physical Component Summary and the Mental Component Summary.
The total score for the Mental Component Summary ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect better mental health functioning.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Index (Utility) Score on EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Descriptive System (EQ-5D-5L) Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 (EOT)
|
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardised measure of health status comprised of a descriptive system of 5 health-related quality of life states (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of overall health.
Each dimension is rated on a 5-point response scale indicating severity of problems, where 1 is "no problems" and 5 is "extreme problems".
The 5 questions are scored and together contribute to the EQ-5D index (utility) score between 0 and 1 (1 being perfect health).
|
Baseline, Months 6 and 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (OIQoL-A) Total Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
The OIQoL-A measures 5 areas of quality of life related to OI (Physical Function, Pain, Hearing Loss, Taking Care/Concerns, Social and Family Life and Activities).
The total score is calculated on a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate a greater (negative) impact on quality of life.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in OIQoL-A Pain Subscale Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
The OIQoL-A measures 5 areas of quality of life related to OI (Physical Function, Pain, Hearing Loss, Taking Care/Concerns, Social and Family Life and Activities).
The Pain subscale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher value representing worse pain.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Change From Baseline in OIQoL-A Activity Subscale Score at Months 6 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
The OIQoL-A measures 5 areas of quality of life related to OI (Physical Function, Pain, Hearing Loss, Taking Care/Concerns, Social and Family Life and Activities).
The Activities subscale ranges from 0 to 100, with higher value representing increased difficulty.
|
Baseline, Months 6, 12 (EOT)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for Anti-Setrusumab Antibodies at Any Time During the Study up to Month 14
Time Frame: up to Month 14
|
Serum samples were screened for antibodies binding to setrusumab using a validated assay method by or under the supervision of the sponsor.
|
up to Month 14
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Treatment-Emergent AEs (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation or Death
Time Frame: Non-serious AEs: up to Month 14; Serious AEs: up to Month 24. (Average duration of exposure to placebo was 5 months and for setrusumab was 11 month plus follow-up to 24 months.)
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment.
A serious AE (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; is another important medical event.
The intensity for each AE was graded as mild, moderate or severe, according to the investigator's judgement.
An event was considered related to study drug if there were a "reasonable possibility" of a relationship, according to the investigator's clinical judgment.
A TEAE was defined as an event occurring or worsening on or after the first dose of study medication.
|
Non-serious AEs: up to Month 14; Serious AEs: up to Month 24. (Average duration of exposure to placebo was 5 months and for setrusumab was 11 month plus follow-up to 24 months.)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Director, Mereo BioPharma
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 11, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
November 12, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 13, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
April 18, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 5, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 29, 2023
Last Verified
February 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Bone Diseases, Developmental
- Osteochondrodysplasias
- Collagen Diseases
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Micronutrients
- Vitamins
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Vitamin D
- Calcium
- Zoledronic Acid
Other Study ID Numbers
- MBPS205
- 2016-005096-27 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type III
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalCompletedOsteogenesis Imperfecta Type III | Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type IIUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNot yet recruitingOsteogenesis Imperfecta | Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type III
-
University Hospital, GhentUniversity Ghent; Brittle Bone Society; Osteogenesis Imperfecta FederationRecruiting
-
Angitia Biopharmaceuticals Guangzhou LimitedNot yet recruitingA Dose REgimen-Finding Study of AGA2115 in Chinese Patients With Osteogenesis ImpeRfecta (EIR) (EIR)Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)China
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliRecruitingOsteogenesis Imperfecta | Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)Italy
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States
-
Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenNovartisCompleted
-
AmgenTerminatedOsteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)Canada, Czechia, Spain, United Kingdom, United States, Italy, Hungary, Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland
-
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences,...CompletedMeniscus Tear | Knee Arthroscopy (for Diagnostic or Therapy) | Knee Meniscus Injury | Meniscal RepairIndia
-
Angitia Incorporated LimitedRecruitingOsteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)United States, France, Netherlands, Australia, Denmark, United Kingdom, Canada, Argentina
Clinical Trials on setrusumab
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncActive, not recruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States, Italy, France, Canada, Netherlands, Brazil, Poland
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncActive, not recruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaJapan
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncMereo BioPharmaTerminatedOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States
-
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical IncMereo BioPharmaActive, not recruitingOsteogenesis ImperfectaUnited States, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal, Australia, France, Netherlands, Turkey (Türkiye), Poland