Effects of the Kinetic Chain Approach for Scapular Dyskinesis

January 3, 2019 updated by: Yi-Fen Shih, National Yang Ming University

Effects of the Kinetic Chain Management Approach on Pain and Performance in Volleyball Athletes With Scapular Dyskinesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Volleyball is a highly technical sport which involved powerful overhead movements performed repetitively. Shoulder injuries is the third-most commonly injured body part in volleyball, with the majority resulting from chronic overuse. Abnormal scapular motions and positions relative to the thorax have been linked to various shoulder pathologies, including subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tears, and glenohumeral inferior instability. Also, Muscular imbalances around the shoulder complex could lead to dyskinesis and resulting in shoulder joint injuries (e.g. instability and impingement).

The concept of "kinetic chain" is coordinated sequencing of the segments. Sequential activation of the LE, pelvis and trunk muscles is required to facilitate the forces to be transferred appropriately from these body segments to the UE.

Reeser et al. have identified risk factors for volleyball-related shoulder pain and dysfunction. They found volleyball athletes who demonstrated core instability would show greater relevance to SICK scapula, and they also more likely to report a history of shoulder problems. Sciascia et al. also have reviewed that 49% athletes with posterior-superior labral tears showed either decreased hip rotators flexibility or decreased hip abductors strength. Consequently, the deficits in kinetic chain segments would resulted in scapula dyskinesis, even lead to shoulder girdle dysfunction or injury.

Therefore, the modern training programs for athletes, especially in overhead players, should combine kinetic chain exercises to improve upper- and lower body core strength, sport-specific strength, performance, and prevent injury occurrence or recurrence.

In consideration of no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to determine whether kinetic chain exercise would be more effective to conventional scapula training for patients with secondary shoulder impingement. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of kinetic chain management approach (KC) and conventional training of scapula dyskinesis (CT) in volleyball athletes with scapular dyskinesia. The investigators hypothesized that KC group would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their scapula would become more stable during movement task (arm-lifting and spiking) after a 4-week training program than CT group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Volleyball is a highly technical sport which involved powerful overhead movements performed repetitively. Shoulder injuries is the third-most commonly injured body part in volleyball, with the majority resulting from chronic overuse. Abnormal scapular motions and positions relative to the thorax have been linked to various shoulder pathologies, including subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tears, and glenohumeral inferior instability. Also, Muscular imbalances around the shoulder complex could lead to dyskinesis and resulting in shoulder joint injuries (e.g. instability and impingement).

The concept of "kinetic chain" is coordinated sequencing of the segments. Sequential activation of the LE, pelvis and trunk muscles is required to facilitate the forces to be transferred appropriately from these body segments to the UE.

One previous study have identified risk factors for volleyball-related shoulder pain and dysfunction. They found volleyball athletes who demonstrated core instability would show greater relevance to SICK scapula, and they also more likely to report a history of shoulder problems. Another study also have reviewed that 49% athletes with posterior-superior labral tears showed either decreased hip rotators flexibility or decreased hip abductors strength. Consequently, the deficits in kinetic chain segments would resulted in scapula dyskinesis, even lead to shoulder girdle dysfunction or injury.

Therefore, the modern training programs for athletes, especially in overhead players, should combine kinetic chain exercises to improve upper- and lower body core strength, sport-specific strength, performance, and prevent injury occurrence or recurrence.

In consideration of no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed to determine whether kinetic chain exercise would be more effective to conventional scapula training for patients with secondary shoulder impingement. The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of kinetic chain management approach (KC) and conventional training of scapula dyskinesis (CT) in volleyball athletes with scapular dyskinesia. The investigators hypothesized that KC group would be more effective in self-reported pain, and their scapula would become more stable during movement task (arm-lifting and spiking) after a 4-week training program than CT group.

The investigators plan to recruit 50 volleyball athletes. The sample size will be determined by previous studies and our future pilot study. It will be based on a significance level of 0.05, and a power of 0.80 to detect a difference on scapular upward rotation of 4° with a standard deviation of 4.5°. Based on these criteria, at least 21 participants with secondary shoulder impingement syndrome will be required in each group. To account for a withdrawal rate of 10%, participants will be included at least in each group. They will mainly be recruited from the universities in Taipei. A physical therapist will first evaluate the subject whether they are diagnosed of scapular dyskinesia. For subjects' evaluation, physical examination will include observation, palpation, selective tissue tension test (STTT), impingement sign test (Neer's, Hawkins-Kennedy), and scapular motor control test (flexion, abduction, external/internal rotation). Moreover, the investigators will design a check list to confirm whether they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients who meet the criteria will enroll in this study, and then each of them will randomly be divided into two training groups.

The self-reported worst pain in the previous week will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS; maximum score = 10 cm). The VAS is a self-reporting tool used to assess the level of pain of patients with shoulder pain due to scapular dyskinesis. Patients will be asked to draw a mark along a 10-cm line that indicates the amount of pain they are experiencing relative to a score of 0, indicating no pain, and a score of 10, indicating the most pain (worst). On the VAS, the investigators will choose to measure the "worst" pain, because previous studies suggested that it was more reliable than measuring "usual" pain.

LIBERTY™ electromagnetic tracking system (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA) was used to collect three-dimensional kinematic (3D) data during arm-lifting task and spiking task at a sampling rate of 120 Hz, and the software Motion Monitor® (Innovative Sport Training, Inc., Chicago. IL. USA) was used to analyze the data. The main measurement of shoulder kinematics include scapular upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior tilting. A stylus was used to digitize the bony landmarks for defining the anatomical coordinate system. The methods for this measure have been described previously.

For collecting muscle activation data, the investigators used surface electromyography (sEMG, TeleMyo 2400 G2 Telemetry; Noraxon USA, Inc., USA) to collect scapular muscles' activation during arm-lifting task. The investigators will measure the muscle activities of SA, UT, and LT. The electrodes will be placed according to previous studies, and will be positioned in parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers.

For exercise performance assessment during spiking task, the investigators measured scapular kinematics consistency. The spiking task is consisted of total 30 rep of spiking, including initial 5 trials, 20 rep of fatigue, and last 5 trials. The investigators will conduct a pilot study to confirm the measurement which the investigators designed with enough reliability and validity.

The data of each outcome measures would collect at before (PRE measurement) and after 4-week intervention (POST measurement) except for self-reported pain (VAS), which would be collected at each end of week in addition. If the subject could not complete PRE and/or POST measurement, the investigators will note the reason which makes him/her unable to finish the whole trials, such as pain, instability or any discomfort.

Statistical analysis will be done on intention-to-treat basis using SPSS software (version 20; formerly SPSS Inc, now IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Missing data will be replaced using a conservative method with the last score carried forward. The independent t test or Chi-square test will be used for baseline demographic data. Descriptive statistics will include mean, standard deviation, and 95% confidence interval values, and the investigators will calculate 2 × 2 analyses of variance (ANOVAs; group × time; p < 0.05) for each outcome variables. Significant differences revealed by the ANOVA will be further examined using Bonferroni post hoc analysis. The alpha (α) level will be set at 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11221
        • National Yang Ming University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volleyball athletes who performed related sport activities for more than 10 hour/wks
  • Age 18-30 years, with diagnosed of scapula dyskinesia by a physical therapist
  • Shoulder girdle passive range of motion (PROM) within normal limitation
  • Visual analog score (VAS) rating of pain during activities of sport or daily living during the previous week at a minimum of 3 cm on a 10-cm scale
  • Insidious onset of symptoms unrelated to trauma and persistent for at least 4 wks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Can't finish the data collection process due to any other current musculoskeletal pain/injuries
  • Any neuromuscular disorder, joint or bone disease
  • History of any orthopedic surgeries

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: KC group
It mainly involve all segment in kinetic chain, not only shoulder girdle, include exercise training 3 times a week for a total 4 weeks.
  1. 1st week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. PNF scapular pattern: posterior depression (Combination of isotonic, COI), Ball modified prone Cobra, Ball prone V-raise, Ball prone row, Ball side plank, Ball one-leg bridging
  2. 2nd week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. Half sit-up with rotation to left/right, Side plank with ER, Prone extension with rotation to left/right, Bilateral one-leg squat with flexion, Squat to row
  3. 3rd week: 5 rep/set, 3 set/day (sling exercise). Prone shoulder protraction, Supine shoulder retraction, Side-lying hip ABD/ADD, Supine pelvic lift, Prone bridging
  4. 4th week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. Lateral lunges with shoulder ABD/ER, Lunge with trunk rotation, Forward punch plus with serape effect, Spiking exercise, One-quarter vertical squat jump
Other Names:
  • Exercise therapy
Experimental: CT group
It involve shoulder girdle only, include exercise training 3 times a week for a total 4 weeks.
  1. 1st week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. PNF scapular pattern: posterior depression (Combination of isotonic, COI), Knee push up plus, Modified prone Cobra, Prone V-raise, Prone row, Side-lying ER
  2. 2nd week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. Supine punch, Prone horizontal ABD, Prone V-raise, Prone row, Side-lying ER
  3. 3rd week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. Sitting chest press, Sitting ABD in scaption, Sitting overhead press, Long-sitting resisted extension, Sitting ER
  4. 4th week: each 10 rep/set, 3 set/day. Standing horizontal pull-apart, Standing retraction plus ER, Standing resisted extension, Ball pushed on wall and controlled rolling, Wall push-up
Other Names:
  • Exercise therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scapular movement consistency (Proprioceptive Feedback Magnitude, PFM)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4-week intervention
Scapular positioning (kinematics) during spiking task (spike for 30 repetition, and compare the average of first and last 3 trials)
Baseline and 4-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scapulo-humeral rhythm (scapular kinematics)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4-week intervention
Scapular kinematics during spiking task
Baseline and 4-week intervention
Scapula motor control (muscle activation percentage)
Time Frame: Baseline and 4-week intervention
Scapular muscles' activation during spiking task
Baseline and 4-week intervention
Self-reported pain (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of week 1 treatment, end of week 2 treatment, end of week 3 treatment, and end of week 4 treatment
The self-reported worst pain in spiking during previous one week (on a 10-cm scale, 0 cm = no pain, 10 cm = the most severe pain)
Baseline, end of week 1 treatment, end of week 2 treatment, end of week 3 treatment, and end of week 4 treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Yi-Fen Shih, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Clinical Trials on KC group

3
Subscribe