- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03622190
The RISMUS Cohort Study: Risk Among Music Students. (RISMUS)
A Longitudinal Investigation of the Factors Associated With Increased Risk of Playing-related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Music Students
This observational cohort study involves repeated cross-sectional observations in order to identify those factors associated with increased risk of PRMDs among music students.
All pre-college and university-level students from several European music academies will receive an invitation to complete a web-based questionnaire survey at each of three occasions (baseline; 6-months follow-up; 12-months follow-up).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Professional musicians are exposed to chronic high volume of continuous and repeated physical movements, sometimes in challenging and ergonomically unfavourable anatomical body positions, in order to acquire and improve technical playing skills. As a consequence, musicians are vulnerable to developing adverse playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs) that may affect the manner in which and the extent to which music can be practised and performed.
In order to find out effective solutions for PRMDs and to develop future preventive measures, it is fundamental to firstly identify the main risk factors that play a significant role in the development of adverse musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and symptoms.
The longitudinal cohort study will be conducted through the following three phases:
- a baseline cross-sectional survey (i.e. web-based questionnaire) to characterise the study population and subgroups, and form the basis for the evaluation of associated factors and relationships with the development of PRMDs;
- a 6-months follow-up survey, and
- a 12-months follow-up survey.
After the first baseline data collection (Phase 1), the cohort of students will be broken down into:
- Cohort 1: music students (both pre-college and university-level) who are free of pain and PRMDs at baseline data collection
- Cohort 2: music students (both pre-college and university-level) who aren't free of pain and PRMDs at baseline data collection
Afterwards, the two cohorts will be followed and invited for reassessment at 6 months (Phase 2) and 12 months (Phase 3).
Both the follow-ups will permit longitudinal change in outcome scores to be generated and compared (longitudinal comparisons) for strength and progression of association, alongside those from absolute outcome scores at several cross-sectional analyses.
The web-based survey will include questions about any pain, PRMD and/or MSK problem they may have due to their musical practice, and different outcome measures (i.e. lifestyle and physical activity, practice habits, behaviour toward prevention and health history, level of stress, perfectionism, fatigue and disability).
The outcome measures have been selected according to the relevant findings of previous cross-sectional studies and systematic reviews among the performing arts literature.
Each outcome measure correspond to a suspected factor that may be associated with the development of a PRMD.
To the best of our knowledge, no other longitudinal studies on risk factors for PRMDs have been conducted so far. Therefore, the study can be considered as an opportunity to fill the gaps of current research on PRMDs and generate new knowledge in educational and employment musical contexts.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Cinzia Cruder, MA
- Phone Number: 0041766938039
- Email: Ccruder@qmu.ac.uk
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
All pre-college and university-level students from ten music academies, with a classical instrument as main subject (composers and conductors will be excluded) will receive an invitation to complete a web-based questionnaire survey.
Pre-college will include third-year and fourth-year students (age: 18 and 19 years old). University-level will include students enrolled in the first, second and third year of the Bachelor degree course (age: between 19, 20 and 22, 23 years old), as well as students enrolled in the first, second and third year of Master degree course (age: between 22, 23 and 35 years old).
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All pre-college and university-level students from music academies, with a classical instrument as main subject.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Music students without a classical instrument as main subject (composers and conductors)
- Positive history for neurological, rheumatic, psychological disorders or emotional distress, as well as surgery of the upper limbs and/or the spine in the last 12 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Cohort 1
Music students who are free of pain, PRMDs and/or MSK problems at baseline data collection
|
Cohort 2
Music students who aren't free of pain, PRMDs and/or MSK problems at baseline data collection
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Presence of pain or musculoskeletal (MSK) disorder
Time Frame: up to 12 months
|
The presence of pain and/or MSK problems will be assessed through the following question: "When did you last experience a bout of significant pain and/or musculoskeletal problem?"
|
up to 12 months
|
Presence of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMDs)
Time Frame: one month
|
Self reported PRMDs according to the definition: "any pain and/or musculoskeletal problem interfered with students' ability to play their musical instrument at the level to which they are accustomed"
|
one month
|
Severity of pain or MSK disorder
Time Frame: one month
|
Respondents are asked to assign a number, from zero (no pain) to ten (the worst possible pain), to the severity of their pain.
|
one month
|
Location of pain
Time Frame: one month
|
Respondents are asked to indicate where they have pain and/or MSK disorders by clicking on the part(s) in which they have or have had their pain and/or MSK problem during the last month.
|
one month
|
Pain Disability Index
Time Frame: one month
|
A short, self-report instrument for measuring the degree of interference with normal role functioning caused by pain.
The respondent uses an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 10 (total disability) to rate the degree to which pain interferes with functioning in the following seven areas: family/home responsibilities, recreation, social activity, occupation, sexual behavior, self-care, and life-support activity.
The total score can range from 0 to 70.to participate in essential life activities.
|
one month
|
A 2-item short form of the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)
Time Frame: one month
|
Respondents are asked to rate how confidently they can perform work and normal life activities, despite their pain.
They answer by circling a number on a 7-point Likert scale under each item, where 0 = not at all confident and 6= completely confident in the last month.
|
one month
|
Quick Dash - Performing Arts Section
Time Frame: one week
|
This questions relate to the impact of your pain on playing students' practice.
Respondents rate each item based on their experience over the preceding week on a 5-point Likert-type scale, increasing from 1 to 5 in level of difficulty/severity.
|
one week
|
Self-rated health (SRH)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The SHR is a simple measure which is usually assessed as a single-item: "In general, would you say your health is", with the response items "excellent," "very good," "good," "fair," or "poor" to assess health status.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Standardised Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
A general questionnaire on 12-months prevalence of troubles in nine symptom sites being neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, low back, wrist/hands, hips/thighs, knees and ankles/feet.
|
12 months
|
Internation Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAQ-SF)
Time Frame: one week
|
IPAQ-SF investigates the physical activity of four intensity levels (i.e.
vigorous-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, walking, and sitting) in the past week.
|
one week
|
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
Time Frame: four weeks
|
A brief measure of non-specific psychological distress in the anxiety-depression spectrum.
The K10 comprises ten questions about psychological distress designed to measure anxiety and depression.
Each question is related to a specific emotional state and each has a five-level response scale.
It is designed to quantify the frequency and severity of anxiety- and depression-related symptoms experienced in the past four weeks.
|
four weeks
|
Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale - short form (HFMPS-SF)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The HFMPS-SF is a 15-item questionnaire to measure trait perfectionism.
Respondents rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale, increasing in level of agreement (from 1 "disagree" to 7 "agree").
Items are structured according to three subscales: self-oriented (SOP), other-oriented (OOP), and socially prescribed perfectionism (SPP), where higher scores on each scale, indicating higher levels of perfectionistic attitudes and behaviours.
|
12 months
|
The Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ-11)
Time Frame: one month
|
The CFQ-11 is a reliable measure (Cronbach α = 0.90) to assess the severity of tiredness among population (Chalder et al. 1993).
Each of the eleven items are answered on a 4-point Likert-type, from 1 (asymptomatic) increasing to 4 as responses become more symptomatic.
The respondent's global score can range from 0 to 33, where higher scores indicate greater tiredness.
The global score also includes two dimensions-physical fatigue (measured by items 1-7) and psychological fatigue (measured by items 8-11).
|
one month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cinzia Cruder, MA, Queen Margaret University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- REP 0177
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Injury
-
Louis Stokes VA Medical CenterUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingAmputation | Prosthesis User | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation Above Elbow (Injury)United States
-
Orthocare Innovations, LLCNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...RecruitingStroke | Upper Limb Amputation | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Central Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Peripheral Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Nerve Reconstruction | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Tendon Transfer SurgeryUnited States
-
Karen L. Andrews, M.D.University of Pisa; Arizona State UniversityCompletedUpper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury)
-
Sohag UniversityCompletedfor Upper Limb Soft Tissue CoverageEgypt
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabCoapt, LLCRecruitingLower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury) | Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury) | Amputation | Phantom Limb Pain | Phantom Pain | Phantom Sensation | Lower Limb Amputation Knee | Lower Limb Amputation at Ankle (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.WithdrawnAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Limb; Absence, Congenital, Upper
-
University of ManitobaRehabilitation Centre for Children, CanadaNot yet recruitingPediatric | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the Wrist | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury) | Upper Limb Amputation | Amniotic Band Syndrome
-
Universidad de AntioquiaHospital San Vicente FundaciónActive, not recruitingSatisfaction, Patient | Prosthesis User | Upper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury)Colombia
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingUpper Limb Injury