Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and PK of Isatuximab (SAR650984) Alone or in Combination With Atezolizumab in Patients With Advanced Malignancies

July 6, 2023 updated by: Sanofi

A Phase 1/2 Open-label, Multi-center, Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Atezolizumab or Isatuximab Alone in Patients With Advanced Malignancies

Primary Objectives:

  • Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).
  • Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC.
  • Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2.
  • To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab.
  • To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab.
  • To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months including up to 28 days screening period, up to 24 months treatment period, and a 3 month safety follow up period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

107

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
        • Investigational Site Number :0560001
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Investigational Site Number :0560002
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Investigational Site Number :1240001
      • Brno, Czechia, 65653
        • Investigational Site Number :2030001
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 77900
        • Investigational Site Number :2030003
      • Praha 2, Czechia, 12808
        • Investigational Site Number :2030002
      • Milano, Italy, 20141
        • Investigational Site Number :3800009
      • Padova, Italy, 35128
        • Investigational Site Number :3800004
    • Forlì-Cesena
      • Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy, 47014
        • Investigational Site Number :3800007
    • Milano
      • Rozzano, Milano, Italy, 20089
        • Investigational Site Number :3800003
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
        • Investigational Site Number :5280001
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Investigational Site Number :7240007
    • Barcelona [Barcelona]
      • Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], Spain, 08035
        • Investigational Site Number :7240001
    • Castilla Y León
      • Hospitalet de Llobregat, Castilla Y León, Spain, 08908
        • Investigational Site Number :7240006
    • Madrid, Comunidad De
      • Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad De, Spain, 28050
        • Investigational Site Number :7240004
      • Madrid / Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad De, Spain, 28040
        • Investigational Site Number :7240003
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
        • Investigational Site Number :7240008
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Investigational Site Number :1580005
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • Investigational Site Number :1580002
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 114
        • Investigational Site Number :1580004
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 104
        • Investigational Site Number :1580003
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • Investigational Site Number :1580006
      • Taipei 100, Taiwan
        • Investigational Site Number :1580001
    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Investigational Site Number :8400004
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Investigational Site Number :8400007
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Investigational Site Number :8400002

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Participants must have a known diagnosis of either unresectable HCC, platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, platinum-resistant/refractory EOC with evidence of measurable disease or recurrent GBM.
  • Greater than or equal to (>=)18 years of age.
  • For participants with HCC: Documentation of progressive disease (PD) during or after treatment with either sorafenib or lenvatinib, or intolerance to the therapy.
  • For participants with SCCHN: Received and failed up to 2 lines of prior systemic anti-cancer therapy with documentation of tumor recurrence or PD within 6 months of last platinum-based therapy in primary, recurrent, or metastatic setting.
  • For participants with EOC: Received up to 3 lines of prior platinum-containing therapy when the disease was platinum-sensitive, and the participants should not have received any systemic therapy for platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Specific to France only: Documentation of PD on or after 1 line of anti-cancer therapy for platinum resistant/refractory disease (unless participants are ineligible or intolerant to standard of care for platinum-resistant/refractory disease).
  • For participants with GBM: Documentation of PD or first recurrence during or after temozolomide maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed GBM treated with 1st line radiotherapy plus concurrent temozolomide.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38 or participation in clinical studies with isatuximab.
  • For participants with HCC, SCCHN, EOC or GBM prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway.
  • Evidence of other immune related disease /conditions.
  • History of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring steroids or current pneumonitis; history of the thoracic radiation.
  • Received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start. Seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted.
  • Prior solid organ or bone marrow transplantation.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >=2 for participants with HCC, SCCHN or EOC or Karnofsky performance score less than or equal to (<=) 70 for participants with GBM.
  • Poor bone marrow reserve.
  • Poor organ function.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams, every 3 weeks (Q3W), intravenous (IV) infusion along with isatuximab 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AE), participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks).

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Sarclisa

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Tecentriq®
Experimental: Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) received atezolizumab 1200 milligrams,Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 108 weeks).

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Sarclisa

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Tecentriq®
Experimental: Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 61 weeks).

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Sarclisa

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Tecentriq®
Experimental: Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks).

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Sarclisa

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion

Route of administration: intravenous

Other Names:
  • Tecentriq®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to [>=] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G >=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 [DL-1]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G >=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting >3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 >14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.
Cycle 1 (21 days)
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts
Time Frame: From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis <10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of >1 new lesion.
From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort
Time Frame: From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1
PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as >=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: >=60 - less than (<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m^2), >=30 - <60 mL/min/1.73m^2, >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 and <15 mL/min/1.73m^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab
Time Frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Time Frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab.
At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
Time Frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden
Time Frame: From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.
From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months
Time Frame: From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) & stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) & stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU & stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: <50% reduction to <25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU & stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): >=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to <10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD.
From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status.
From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: >=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression.
From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort
Time Frame: From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR & PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as >=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as >=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status.
From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Sciences & Operations, Sanofi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ACT15377
  • 2018-000390-67 (EudraCT Number)
  • U1111-1202-0839 (Other Identifier: UTN)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Isatuximab SAR650984

Subscribe