Xenotransplantation of Primary Cancer Samples in Zebrafish Embryos (xenoZ)

September 10, 2018 updated by: Luca Morelli, University of Pisa
The study consists in a co-clinical trial by using zebrafish embryos. Specifically, an observational prospective clinical trial on patients operated of epato-biliar-pancreatic cancers and gastro-intestinal cancers undergoing a chemotherapy treatment will be run concurrently to an animal trial on zebrafish embryos xenotransplanted with patient cancer cells in order to demonstrate that zebrafish model is able to predict the therapeutic regimen with the best efficacy for each patient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the last years, a new concept of personalised medicine called 'Mouse Avatars' or 'co-clinical trials' has emerged. Development of mouse avatars implicates implantation of patient tumour samples in mice for use in drug efficacy studies. This model allows conducting preclinical trials in parallel with ongoing human phase I/II clinical trials. Murine and patient trials are conducted concurrently, and information obtained from the murine system is used for clinical management of the patient's tumour. The advantage of this approach is that each patient has his/her own tumour growing in an in vivo system, thereby allowing the identification of a personalised therapeutic approach. Such approach eliminates the cost and toxicity associated with non-targeted chemotherapy. Unfortunately, nowadays, it is clear that co-clinical trials using mouse avatars are not affordable because mice are expensive and time-consuming. The study challenge is to make Avatars available for every patient and the approach sustainable for the National Healthcare Systems. To implement this concept, the investigators propose to replace mouse Avatars with zebrafish Avatars. Indeed, the investigators propose to run co-clinical trials by using zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish embryos as model for human cancer cell xenografts offer several advantages:

  1. Rejection-free model. In zebrafish thymus is not working until 9 days post-fertilization (dpf), allowing rejection-free xenografts during this period. Indeed, the use of expensive immune-permissive strains is not required, in sharp contrast to the mouse model.
  2. Very low cost of husbanding.
  3. Reduced amount of testing material. Zebrafish experiments require much less material to assess drug efficacy.
  4. Short time for the analysis of xenotransplants. The time required for a drug efficacy study is 5 days, as opposite to several weeks or months in the mouse model.
  5. Low experimental cost and simple procedures. The zebrafish produces large number of embryos with each fecundation (hundreds). This provides statistical power to the analysis and facilitates the collection of a large number of data.
  6. Low ethical impact. Zebrafish is classified as insentient from fecundation to the time at which embryos become capable of independent feeding (120 hours post fertilization, hpf); therefore, during this time it does not require a license according to the Directive 2010/63/EU.
  7. Data collected in zebrafish are relevant to humans. Zebrafish genome is closely related to that of humans. For instance, remarkable similarity in molecular signalling processes, cellular structure, anatomy, and physiology has been observed between zebrafish and other high-order vertebrates, including humans. This accounts for the exponential increase in the use of zebrafish in drug discovery during the last two decades.

Collectively, these points outline the remarkable advantages of the zebrafish Avatar over the mouse Avatar, paving the way for a realistic and cost-sustainable implementation of the co-clinical trials.

Specifically, the aim of the study is to perform an observational prospective clinical trial on patients operated of epato-biliar-pancreatic cancers and gastro-intestinal cancers undergoing a chemotherapy treatment in order to demonstrate that zebrafish Avatar is able to predict the therapeutic regimen with the best efficacy for each patient. To this effect, 120 patients meeting the trial inclusion criteria will be enrolled over a 18 months period. In this study, a fragment of tumor will be taken from the surgical specimen by the pathologist, fragmented and transplanted in the yolk of 48 hpf zebrafish embryos. The effect of different anticancer drugs and/or their combinations on the survival, proliferation and migration of the xenotransplanted cancer cells will be evaluated by exposing the xenotransplanted embryos to fish water modified with the drugs. The chemotherapy regimens to be tested in the xenografted embryos are selected in agreement to the common clinical practice, i.e.:

  • fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, irinotecan, taxans (docetaxel) in stomach & esophageal cancers
  • fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, irinotecan, gemcitabine, nab paclitaxel in pancreatic/biliary cancers
  • fluoropyrimidines, platinum compounds, irinotecan in colorectal cancers.

Embryos will be analysed 4, 24 and 48 hours post injection (hpi). Primary measures will include:

  • cell proliferation
  • cell migration
  • formation of secondary masses
  • induction of neo-angiogenesis

The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

The comparative evaluation undertaken after closure of intake will be based on prospectively collected data on (i) clinical outcome and (ii) chemo-sensitivity data collected in zebrafish model.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Pisa, Italy, 56124
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vittoria Raffa, Prof
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Enrico Vasile, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gregorio Di Franco, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alice Usai, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Oncological patients from Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- patients operated of epato-biliar-pancreatic cancers and gastro-intestinal cancers (stage III and IV) undergoing a chemotherapy treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age below 18 years
  • significant co-morbid cardiovascular and respiratory disease
  • early stage of disease, (iv) history of prior cancer or prior treatment with any chemotherapy regimen
  • pregnant and lactating females
  • patients requiring urgent/ emergency interventions
  • life expectancy < 12 weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Colorectal cancer
Patients operated for colorectal cancer with or without liver metastasis undergoing a chemotherapy treatment after surgery
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Fluoropyrimidine
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Camptothecin
Esophagus/gastric cancer
Patients operated for esophagus/gastric cancer undergoing a chemotherapy treatment after surgery
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Fluoropyrimidine
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Camptothecin
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Taxane
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Anthracycline
Biliary duct cancer
Patients operated for biliary duct cancer undergoing a chemotherapy treatment after surgery
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Fluoropyrimidine
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
Pancreatic cancer
Patients operated for pancreatic cancer undergoing a chemotherapy treatment after surgery
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Fluoropyrimidine
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Platinum compounds
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Camptothecin
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Antimetabolite
The enrolled patients after the surgical operation will undergo to the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment
Other Names:
  • Taxane

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correspondence with chemo-sensitivity data collected in zebrafish model
Time Frame: 18 months after the surgery
Comparative evaluation between prospectively collected data on clinical outcome and chemo-sensitivity data collected in zebrafish model
18 months after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery
  • Complete response (CR) - complete disappearance of clinical evidence of a tumour. Radiographically equivocal lesions must remain stable or regress.
  • Partial response (PR) - 50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of the longest perpendicular diameters of measured lesion compared to baseline.
  • Stable disease (SD) - no significant change in disease status. Lesion may show a <50% decrease in sum of products of longest perpendicular diameters or an increase of <25%.
  • Progressive disease (PD) - a 25% increase in area of a lesion. Appearance of new lesions constitutes progressive disease.
3 months after the surgery
Overall survival
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery
The length of time from the start of treatment for the cancer that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive
3 months after the surgery
Time to tumour progression
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery
The length of time from the date of start of treatment for the disease until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body
3 months after the surgery
Response rate
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
  • Complete response (CR) - complete disappearance of clinical evidence of a tumour. Radiographically equivocal lesions must remain stable or regress.
  • Partial response (PR) - 50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of the longest perpendicular diameters of measured lesion compared to baseline.
  • Stable disease (SD) - no significant change in disease status. Lesion may show a <50% decrease in sum of products of longest perpendicular diameters or an increase of <25%.
  • Progressive disease (PD) - a 25% increase in area of a lesion. Appearance of new lesions constitutes progressive disease.
6 months after the surgery
Overall survival
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
The length of time from the start of treatment for the cancer that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive
6 months after the surgery
Time to tumour progression
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
The length of time from the date of start of treatment for the disease until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body
6 months after the surgery
Response rate
Time Frame: 12 months after the surgery
  • Complete response (CR) - complete disappearance of clinical evidence of a tumour. Radiographically equivocal lesions must remain stable or regress.
  • Partial response (PR) - 50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of the longest perpendicular diameters of measured lesion compared to baseline.
  • Stable disease (SD) - no significant change in disease status. Lesion may show a <50% decrease in sum of products of longest perpendicular diameters or an increase of <25%.
  • Progressive disease (PD) - a 25% increase in area of a lesion. Appearance of new lesions constitutes progressive disease.
12 months after the surgery
Overall survival
Time Frame: 12 months after the surgery
The length of time from the start of treatment for the cancer that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive
12 months after the surgery
Time to tumour progression
Time Frame: 12 months after the surgery
The length of time from the date of start of treatment for the disease until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body
12 months after the surgery
Response rate
Time Frame: 18 months after the surgery
  • Complete response (CR) - complete disappearance of clinical evidence of a tumour. Radiographically equivocal lesions must remain stable or regress.
  • Partial response (PR) - 50% or greater decrease in the sum of products of the longest perpendicular diameters of measured lesion compared to baseline.
  • Stable disease (SD) - no significant change in disease status. Lesion may show a <50% decrease in sum of products of longest perpendicular diameters or an increase of <25%.
  • Progressive disease (PD) - a 25% increase in area of a lesion. Appearance of new lesions constitutes progressive disease.
18 months after the surgery
Overall survival
Time Frame: 18 months after the surgery
The length of time from the start of treatment for the cancer that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive
18 months after the surgery
Time to tumour progression
Time Frame: 18 months after the surgery
The length of time from the date of start of treatment for the disease until the disease starts to get worse or spread to other parts of the body
18 months after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luca Morelli, Prof, University of Pisa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Fluorouracil

3
Subscribe