"Efficacy Of 1.2% Rosuvastatin Gel In The Management Of Infrabony Defects"

September 18, 2018 updated by: DR. SUKHADA DEO, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital

Comparative Evaluation of Treatment Of Infrabony Defects With and Without 1.2% Rosuvastatin Gel: In-Vivo Study

Study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic effectiveness of 1.2% Rosuvastatin gel in the treatment of Infrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Source from where the patients will be selected:

10 patients with chronic periodontitis having two or more infrabony defects will be selected from the Outpatient section of Dept. of Periodontology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Pimpri, Pune - 18.

A detailed clinical examination, case history and written consent will be obtained from all the participants.

Before surgery, each patient will be given careful instructions regarding proper oral hygiene measures. A full-mouth phase I therapy will be performed. A periodontal re-evaluation will be performed after 4 to 6 weeks of phase 1 therapy to confirm the desired sites for the study. The selected sites will be divided randomly by using a Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) randomization into control and test sites. The control site will be treated with Access Flap Surgery (AFS), whereas test sites will be treated with AFS and 1.2% Rosuvastatin gel. Suitable antibiotics and analgesics will be prescribed along with Chlorhexidine digluconate rinses (0.2%) twice daily for 14 days. Patients will be examined at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 month after surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411018
        • Sukhada Deo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age group between 30-50 years
  • Probing pocket depth ≥ 5mm following initial therapy.
  • Suitable interproximal angular infrabony defects of ≥3mm.
  • Involved teeth should be vital and asymptomatic.
  • Systemically healthy patients.
  • Patients who demonstrate acceptable oral hygiene prior to access flap surgery.
  • Patients agreed to sign informed consent and willing to return for the follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic statin therapy
  • Known or suspected allergy to the statin group
  • Allergy to sulfur containing drugs
  • History of aggressive periodontitis.
  • Presence of gingival recession at the surgical site.
  • Mobility of study teeth ≥ grade I.
  • Use of tobacco in any form.
  • Pregnant and lactating women.
  • patients who have received any anti-inflammatory drugs and antibiotics in the previous six months.
  • H/O osteoporosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ROSUVASTATIN
1.2% Rosuvastatin Gel. Insertion in infrabony defects once
Test sites were treated with access flap surgery and 1.2% Rosuvastatin gel
Other Names:
  • No intervention used on Control site
Placebo Comparator: placebo
No intervention used on control site
Test sites were treated with access flap surgery and 1.2% Rosuvastatin gel
Other Names:
  • No intervention used on Control site

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone fill
Time Frame: 6 months

Radiographic parameter measuring distance from cemento-enamel junction to the base of the defect.

Difference in the measurement at the end of 6 months shows the amount of bone fill

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probing depth
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical parameters- Reduction in this parameter is desired at the end of 6 months
6 months
relative attachment level
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical parameters- Reduction in this parameter at the end of 6 months shows gain in attachment
6 months
plaque index
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical parameters- Reduction in plaque index at the end of 6 months shows improvement in gingival health
6 months
bleeding index
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical parameters- Reduction in bleeding index at the end of 6 months shows improvement in gingival health
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sukhada D Deo, BDS, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adult Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Rosuvastatin

3
Subscribe