POC Analysis of IO Blood Samples Within Critically Ill Patients

March 6, 2019 updated by: Jouni Nurmi, MD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Point-of-care Analyses of Intraosseous Blood Samples Within Critically Ill Patients

This study aims to investigate whether point-of-care (POC) analysis of intraosseous (IO) blood samples from critically ill emergency patients are accurate enough for emergency decision making, in comparison with arterial point-of-care samples.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Intravenous access is sometimes difficult to achieve due to vasoconstriction or centralization of circulation. Feasible IO-access with power-driven device is a standard alternative method of vascular access for critically ill patients. It is still unclear whether results of IO samples agree with venous or arterial blood samples so that they could be used in clinical decision-making.

After intraosseous access has been established for fluid resuscitation or medication, a common practice is to aspirate a small amount of blood to verify the proper location of the IO-needle.

POC-testing can provide emergency physicians or paramedics with important information about the patients. Could bone marrow samples be used for POC-testing instead of arterial or venous blood for emergency treatment decision-making or patient allocation?

Several animal and human studies have been published to investigate the correlation between IO versus venous or arterial blood values. Investigators of this study have performed a study in healthy volunteers and discovered that there is a good agreement for some laboratory parameters (pH, gluc, lact), but for K the agreement is poor. Our study group has as well performed a study in critically ill animals investigating the agreement during cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Te evidence about critically ill people is still week.

Aim of this study is to analyze the reliability of analysis of IO samples compared to arterial blood samples within critically ill adult emergency patients.

The hypotheses of this study are:

  1. Principally, it is possible to analyze IO blood samples with a POC device.
  2. The results are reliable enough to guide emergency treatment.

If both hypotheses prove to be true, the method can be immediately used in emergency medical situations, e.g. in searching for reversible causes of cardiac arrest.

Setting

Prospective, observational study with 35 prehospital emergency patients. The IO-samples are collected from the small amount of blood, which is aspirated from intraosseous space to confirm the correct needle placement. The IO needles are inserted to the patients for emergency treatment, not because of the study. Critically ill patients, to whom emergency doctors are inserting an intraosseous needle for emergency fluid or drug treatment, are included in the study.

Samples will be analyzed by using an i-STAT point of care analyzer (i-STAT® handheld, Abbot Point of Care Inc. U.S.A) using CG8+ cartridges to analyse Hb, Na, K, pH, pCO2, pO2, TCO2, HCO3, BE, and SpO2. The reliability of the results comparing the IO and arterial samples will be tested with Bland-Altman method by calculating the bias with 95% confidence intervals.

Ethical issues

The ethical committee of Medical Faculty of University of Helsinki has approved the research. Informed consent is waived.

Time plan

The samples will be collected during years 2017 - 2019. The analysis will be performed in the end of the year 2019.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vantaa, Finland
        • FinnHEMS10, Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Emergency patients, which are met by the helicopter emergency unit during their normal tasks

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • need for point-of-care analysis
  • need for intraosseous access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac arrest
  • ability to understand the consent issues in Finnish, Swedish or English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
pre-hospital emergency patients
Patient in a need of an IO-access. Patient in a need of point-of-care laboratory analysis. Over 18 years. Alive (no Cardiac arrest.)
POC analysis with i-STAT POC analyser from the intraosseous and arterial blood

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
agreement between intraosseous (IO) and arterial POC analyses
Time Frame: Samples are analysed immediately after the sample has been taken. Statistical analysis about the agreement performed when the whole data has been collected.
agreement analysed with Bland-Altman method from IO and arterial blood samples, which have been analysed with iSTAT point-of care analyser for following parameters: Hb, pH, BE, HCO3, pO2, pCO2, glucose, Na, K, iCa
Samples are analysed immediately after the sample has been taken. Statistical analysis about the agreement performed when the whole data has been collected.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jouni Nurmi, M.D. Ph D, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critically Ill

Clinical Trials on point-of-care laboratory analysis

Subscribe