HAIC Plus Lenvatinib and PD-1 Antibody Versus HAIC Plus Lenvatinib for Advanced HCC

May 2, 2019 updated by: Shi Ming, Sun Yat-sen University

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Lenvatinib and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Antibody Versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Lenvatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin plus lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 antibody compared with lenvtinib Alone in patients with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin plus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was effective and safe for hepatocellular carcinoma. Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. No study has compared HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 antibody with HAIC plus lenvatinib. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective randomized control study to find out it.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510620
        • Guangzhou Twelfth People 's Hospita
      • Kaiping, Guangdong, China, 529300
        • Kaiping Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)
  • Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria.
  • Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2
  • with no previous treatment
  • No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
  • Not amendable to surgical resection ,local ablative therapy and any other cured treatment.
  • The following laboratory parameters:

Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L Serum albumin ≥ 30 g/L ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3

• Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
  • Known history of HIV
  • History of organ allograft
  • Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
  • Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
  • Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
  • Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
  • Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 antibody
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 antibody
12 mg (or 8 mg) once daily (QD) oral dosing.
3mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks
Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin
administration of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries
Active Comparator: HAIC plus lenvatinib
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus lenvatinib
12 mg (or 8 mg) once daily (QD) oral dosing.
Oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin
administration of oxaliplatin , fluorouracil, and leucovorin via the tumor feeding arteries

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 12 months
OS was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, and participants who remained alive were censored at the time of data cutoff.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 12 months
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), or date of death, whichever occurred first.
12 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 12 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mRECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions.
12 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of adverse events. Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.03
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Lenvatinib

3
Subscribe