Sustainability of Impacts of Cash Transfers, Food Transfers, and Behavior Change Communication in Bangladesh (TMRI)

Sustainability of Impacts of Cash Transfers, Food Transfers, and Behavior Change Communication in Bangladesh: Transfer Modality Research Initiative

This study assesses the sustainability of impacts, 4 years post-program, from a pilot safety net program that was implemented from May 2012-April 2014. The intervention, called the Transfer Modality Research Initiative (TMRI), was assigned following a cluster-randomized controlled trial design in two zones of Bangladesh (north and south). Intervention arms were assigned at the village level, where arms were as follows: (1) cash transfers [north and south]; (2) cash transfers + nutrition behavior communication change (BCC) [north only]; (3) food transfers [north and south]; (4) food transfers + nutrition BCC [south only]; (4) food-cash split [north and south]; and (5) control [north and south]. Within treatment villages, women living in very poor households were targeted to receive benefits for two years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the study is to assess, 4 years after a pilot safety net intervention ended in April 2014, the sustainability of the intervention's impacts on households, children, and women. The intervention, called the Transfer Modality Research Initiative (TMRI), was assigned following a cluster-randomized controlled trial design in two zones of Bangladesh (north and south). WFP-Bangladesh implemented the intervention, and the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) conducted the impact evaluation research. Intervention arms were assigned at the village level, where arms were as follows: (1) cash transfers [north and south]; (2) cash transfers + nutrition behavior communication change (BCC) [north only]; (3) food transfers [north and south]; (4) food transfers + nutrition BCC [south only]; (5) food-cash split [north and south]; and (5) control [north and south]. Within treatment villages, women living in very poor households were targeted to receive benefits for two years, from May 2012-April 2014. For the original impact evaluation, longitudinal data on 5000 households were collected from 2012-2015 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02237144).

For the sustainability study in 2018, given available funding, the sampling frame will include 4000 households. This will include all households that were originally in the following arms: (1) cash transfers [north and south]; (2) cash transfers + nutrition BCC [north only]; (3) food transfers [north and south]; (4) food transfers + nutrition BCC [south only]; (5) control [north and south].

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Former participant of Transfer Modality Research Initiative study (in cash, food, cash+BCC, food+BCC, or control arms)

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cash transfer
1500 taka ($18.75) per household distributed monthly
1500 taka ($18.75) per household distributed monthly
Experimental: Food transfer
30 kg rice, 2 kg lentils, and 2 kg micro-nutrient fortified cooking oil per household distributed monthly
30 kg rice, 2 kg lentils, and 2 kg micro-nutrient fortified cooking oil per household distributed monthly
Experimental: Food and cash transfer
15 kg of rice; 1 kg of lentils and 1 kg of micronutrient fortified cooking oil and 750 taka cash per household, distributed monthly
15 kg of rice, 1 kg of lentils, and 1 kg of micronutrient-fortified cooking oil, and 750 taka cash per household, distributed monthly
Experimental: Cash transfer + nutrition BCC
1500 taka ($18.75) per household distributed monthly. Nutrition behavior change communication (weekly, one-hour group-based meetings on maternal and child nutrition, sanitation and health knowledge, attitudes and practice; twice-a-month home visits; monthly community meetings).
1500 taka ($18.75) per household distributed monthly
Weekly, group-based, one-hour meetings on maternal and child nutrition, sanitation and health knowledge, attitudes and practice; twice-a-month home visits; monthly community meetings
Experimental: Food transfer + nutrition BCC
30 kg rice, 2 kg lentils, and 2 kg micro-nutrient fortified cooking oil per household distributed monthly. Nutrition behavior change communication (weekly, one-hour group-based meetings on maternal and child nutrition, sanitation and health knowledge, attitudes and practice; twice-a-month home visits; monthly community meetings).
30 kg rice, 2 kg lentils, and 2 kg micro-nutrient fortified cooking oil per household distributed monthly
Weekly, group-based, one-hour meetings on maternal and child nutrition, sanitation and health knowledge, attitudes and practice; twice-a-month home visits; monthly community meetings
Experimental: Control
No transfer, no behavior change communication
No transfer, no behavior change communication

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Food Consumption Score
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
The Food Consumption Score, as defined by the World Food Programme, is calculated as the number of food groups consumed by the household in the previous 7 days, weighted by each food group's nutritional value and frequency of consumption. Scale range is 0 to 112, with higher values reflecting higher food consumption.
After 4 years post-intervention
Child height-for-age z-score
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Calculated using the 2006 WHO growth reference. This is a continuous measure that represents the number of standard deviations from the mean among comparable children in the WHO growth reference.
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of physical intimate partner violence
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of any physical intimate partner violence in the past 12 months measured using the WHO Violence Against Women instrument
After 4 years post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Household dietary diversity
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured by counting the number of food groups consumed by the household
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of total household consumption
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Aggregate value of household food and non-food consumption expenditures. This is a continuous measure calculated from household survey responses on consumption behavior, using the methodology and questionnaire modules described in Deaton and Zaidi (2002). Citation: A.Deaton,, and S. Zaidi. 2002. "Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis." Washington, DC : World Bank.
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household food consumption
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household food consumption expenditures. This is a continuous measure calculated from household survey responses on consumption behavior, using the methodology and questionnaire modules described in Deaton and Zaidi (2002). Citation: A.Deaton,, and S. Zaidi. 2002. "Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis." Washington, DC : World Bank.
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household non-food consumption
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household non-food consumption expenditures. This is a continuous measure calculated from household survey responses on consumption behavior, using the methodology and questionnaire modules described in Deaton and Zaidi (2002). Citation: A.Deaton,, and S. Zaidi. 2002. "Guidelines for Constructing Consumption Aggregates for Welfare Analysis." Washington, DC : World Bank.
After 4 years post-intervention
Household food insecurity
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale. Scale range is 0 to 27, with higher values reflecting higher food insecurity.
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household labor income
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Value of annual labor income over all household members
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household non-labor income
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Value of annual non-labor income over all household members
After 4 years post-intervention
Value of household asset ownership
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Total value of all assets owned
After 4 years post-intervention
Household land ownership
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Area of land owned
After 4 years post-intervention
Housing quality: interviews
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Quality of housing stock. This is measured using a module developed for the study context, and information is collected through household enumerator observation during interviews.
After 4 years post-intervention
Maternal nutrition knowledge score
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Number answered correctly on a test of maternal knowledge regarding infant and young child feeding practices developed for the survey, based on the curriculum of training sessions in the intervention.
After 4 years post-intervention
Maternal infant and young child feeding practices
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Maternal adherence to WHO-recommended infant and young child feeding practices
After 4 years post-intervention
Child score on Raven's Progressive Matrices
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using Raven's Progressive Matrices set A and set B. This is constructed following the test's protocol for scoring.
After 4 years post-intervention
Child score on Early Grade Reading Assessment
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using Early Grade Reading Assessment adapted to local context. This is constructed following the test's protocol for scoring.
After 4 years post-intervention
Child score on Early Grade Mathematics Assessment
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using Early Grade Mathematics Assessment adapted to local context. This is constructed following the test's protocol for scoring.
After 4 years post-intervention
Child score on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, part of the Development and Well-Being Assessment family of mental heath measures. This is constructed following the test's protocol for scoring.
After 4 years post-intervention
Child weight-for-height z-score
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Calculated using the 2006 WHO growth reference. This is a continuous measure that represents the number of standard deviations from the mean among comparable children in the WHO growth reference.
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of child stunting
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Calculated using the 2006 WHO growth reference
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of child wasting
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Calculated using the 2006 WHO growth reference
After 4 years post-intervention
Child illness
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Mother's report of child illness in previous 2 weeks
After 4 years post-intervention
Parental interaction with child
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Time spent on child stimulation activities in previous 7 days, measured using modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Parental discipline of the child
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Disciplinary measures used in the past month, measured using modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Community norms on gender
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Community leaders' attitudes toward gender, measured using modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of emotional violence
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of any emotional intimate partner violence in the past 12 months measured using the WHO Violence Against Women instrument
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of controlling behaviors
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of any controlling behaviors in the past 12 months measured using the WHO Violence Against Women instrument
After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of individual acts of intimate partner violence
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Prevalence of individual acts of intimate partner violence in the past 12 months measured using the WHO Violence Against Women instrument
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual decisionmaking
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's decisionmaking modules adapted from pro-WEAI
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual asset ownership
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's asset ownership modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual mobility
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's mobility modules adapted from pro-WEAI
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual labor force participation
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's labor modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual attitudes toward gender and intimate partner violence
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's attitudes toward gender and intimate partner violence modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual social capital
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's social capital modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual stress
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's Perceived Stress Scale scores
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual depression
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Test scores
After 4 years post-intervention
Individual aspirations
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's aspirations modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention
Spousal relationship
Time Frame: After 4 years post-intervention
Measured using men's and women's relationship modules developed for the survey
After 4 years post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Hoddinott, DPhil, Cornell University
  • Principal Investigator: Melissa Hidrobo, PhD, International Food Policy Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Development

Clinical Trials on Cash transfer

3
Subscribe