ERNIE4: Urine and CRP Point-of-care Test in Acutely Ill Children (ERNIE4)

May 31, 2021 updated by: Ann Van den Bruel, KU Leuven

Urine and CRP Tests at the Point-of-care for the Diagnostic Assessment of Acutely Ill Children: a Diagnostic and Prognostic Study

This study aims to assess the accuracy of a novel urine test for diagnosing urinary tract infections in acutely ill children presenting to ambulatory care. The accuracy of this novel test will be compared to the accuracy of conventional dipstick testing. In addition, the evidence on urine tests will be added to the existing algorithm for diagnosing serious infections in children. Finally, the study aims to describe the relation between the CRP level at study entry and the duration of symptoms and final diagnosis over the following 30 days.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The design is a cross-sectional cohort study with a nested longitudinal follow-up in acutely children presenting to ambulatory care.

The cross-sectional cohort study will compare an innovative urine test with conventional dipstick testing to establish their relative accuracy to diagnose urinary tract infections, and construct an algorithm consisting of clinical features, urine test results and CRP point-of-care testing to identify serious infections. The longitudinal follow-up study will describe illness trajectories of children with an intermediate CRP test result (5-80 mg/L) at first contact.

The study will run in general practices and community paediatrics in Flanders. Recruitment to the study is expected to last 18 months, with each patient entering the study only once. Children and their parents/guardians will be approached for possible participation in the study by practice staff. There is only one study visit.

Those who agree to participation via written informed consent will have demographics and clinical features recorded. All children will be asked to provide a urine sample on study entry. Subsequently, CRP point-of-care testing will be conducted in all children testing positive on a clinical prediction rule, and in a random sample of children testing negative on that rule. Follow-up information for all children will be collected using general practice notes, hospital records and direct patient/parent contact.

Treatment and other management decisions will be left to the treating physicians' discretion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

868

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • KU Leuven

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 3 months to 18 years
  • Presenting to a general practice or community paediatrics
  • Acute illness of a maximum of 10 days
  • Parent or guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically unstable warranting immediate care
  • Urinary catheter in situ
  • Immunosuppressant medication taken in the previous 30 days
  • Trauma is the main presenting problem
  • Antibiotics taken in the previous 7 days
  • Children who present to community paediatrics as a result of direct GP referral

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CRP in all

All children will undergo a CRP point-of-care test using a fingerprick of blood and producing a result within 4 minutes using the Afinion 2 (Abbott).

There will be only 1 test at study entry

CRP point-of-care test using a fingerprick of blood and producing a result within 4 minutes, using the Afinion 2 (Abbott)
Experimental: CRP in high risk children only

Children who are positive on a clinical prediction rule for serious infections in children will undergo CRP point-of-care test using a fingerprick of blood and producing a result within 4 minutes using the Afinion 2 (Abbott).

There will be only 1 test at study entry

CRP point-of-care test using a fingerprick of blood and producing a result within 4 minutes, using the Afinion 2 (Abbott)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Urinary tract infection
Time Frame: 3 days
The number of children with a urinary tract infection based on urine culture
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious infections
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of children admitted to hospital for a serious infection which can be pneumonia, sepsis, meningitis, pyelonephritis, osteomyelitis or appendicitis
30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Final diagnosis
Time Frame: 30 days
For children not admitted to hospital, the final diagnosis based on all available clinical information from ambulatory care assessment over 30 days after the index date.
30 days
Duration of symptoms
Time Frame: 30 days
For all children, the duration of symptoms after the index date based on patient diaries
30 days
Healthcare resource use
Time Frame: 30 days
For all children, re-consultation rates in ambulatory care after the index date
30 days
Healthcare resource use
Time Frame: 30 days
For all children, ED attendance after the index date
30 days
Healthcare resource use
Time Frame: 30 days
For all children, hospital admission after the index date
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ann Van den Bruel, MD PhD, ACHG, KU Leuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S61991

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Any invitations for data sharing will be assessed on scientific validity, after which a decision will be taken.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infection

Clinical Trials on CRP point-of-care testing

Subscribe