Diagnosis and Treatment of ACS in the ED: The Impact of Rapid Bedside cTnI Testing on Outcomes (Dispo-ACS)

February 1, 2018 updated by: Brian Gibler, University of Cincinnati

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Emergency Department: The Impact of Rapid Bedside cTnI Testing on Outcomes

In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, point-of care testing at the bedside using the cardiac biomarker troponin I in ED patients with possible ACS will be compared to traditional testing of this assay for myocardial necrosis obtained in the central laboratory. Our hypothesis: point-of-care testing for troponin I will decrease the time for disposition of patients with possible ACS in the emergency setting and decrease the time required for administering appropriate therapies for these patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cardiac troponin I is routinely used in the emergency department as a risk stratification tool for detecting myocardial necrosis in patients with possible acute coronary syndrome. It is our hypothesis that having bedside, point-of-care testing for TnI in the ED will decrease time needed to disposition patients to home from the ED or send to the cardiac catheterization laboratory or intensive care setting. Similarly, having point-of-care testing in the ED should decrease the time required to deliver anti-platelet drugs such as aspirin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and anti-thrombin agents such as heparin to high risk patients found to have a positive TnI test. This will be evaluated in a randomized, controlled clinical trial of 2000 patients. Half will have the test performed in the ED at the bedside (point-of-care) while the other half will receive the usual lab results obtained from the central lab (typically requiring 1.5-2 hours to return).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305-6203
        • Stanford University
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45236
        • The Jewish Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104-6205
        • The University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 21 years or older, presenting with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes, and having cardiac biomarker tests ordered by the treating emergency physician were enrolled. Patients with a tachydysrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, or rapid atrial fibrillation) or a 12-lead ECG diagnostic for acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Patients were enrolled at 4 sites across the United States between December 2004 and November 2006, with final data collection and verification occurring by March 2007.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >21 years old
  • Chest pain or other symptoms that lead to drawing cardiac bio-markers for possible ACS diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

  • Presentation with chest pain in the presence of a tachydysrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, or rapid atrial fibrillation)
  • Presentation with ECG diagnostic for STEMI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
central laboratory cTnI test
Control Group
Point of Care cTnL testing
Experimental Group

The study design will be a phase IV prospective, randomized (1:1), parallel-group trial utilizing concurrent controls. The experimental group of interest will be patients receiving the POC cTnI test, and the control group will be patients receiving the central laboratory cTnI test.

The treating physician will be blinded to the randomization and will receive only the POC results from half the study patients and only the laboratory results for the remaining half.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to disposition from the ED
Time Frame: The time from blood draw to initiation of therapy or to disposition
The primary hypotheses are that i) POC testing using the i-STAT system reduces the time to disposition and discharge for low-risk patients being discharged directly from the ED, and ii) POC testing using the i-STAT system reduces the time to therapy compared to laboratory testing for the subset of patients requiring anti-thrombotic therapies such as heparin/LMW heparin or anti-platelet agents such as GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors or clopidogrel or PCI. These groups of patients (those with new ST-depression, recurrent pain, positive troponin, diabetes, age >65 years, or failed ASA and those discharged without a diagnosis associated with ischemic chest pain) will be extracted from the entire sample. The time from blood draw to initiation of therapy or to disposition and discharge will be computed and compared between the group with POC testing and the group with laboratory testing.
The time from blood draw to initiation of therapy or to disposition

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to departure
Time Frame: time of discharge to home or to the time of transfer to an inpatient setting
time of discharge to home or to the time of transfer to an inpatient setting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Walter B Gibler, MD, University of Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Blood samples banked for future use. Must be IRB approved before use.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe