National Retrospective Study Of Recanalization Treatments In Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke (KID-CLOT)

November 19, 2021 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

National Retrospective Study Of Recanalization Treatments In Pediatric Arterial Ischemic Stroke (Intra-venous Thrombolysis and/or Endovascular Treatment: Thrombectomy, Intra-arterial Thrombolysis)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate recanalization treatments use, safety and efficacy at the acute phase of arterial ischemic stroke in pediatric patients

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Arterial ischemic stroke outcomes benefited from the implementation of recanalization treatments (IV thrombolysis, endovascular treatments) and adapted management pathways in adult patients. Nevertheless randomized trials did not enroll patients under the age of 18 years old and data concerning these treatments in children are scarce. As it is much less frequent than in adults, recognition of stroke is often delayed in children. Consequently, acute phase trials are difficult to set up and perform. The phase I multicentric international prospective trial TIPS (Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke) was prematurely stopped because of poor enrollment. Published retrospective regional (Paris-Ile-de-France region, France) and national (Switzerland) studies addressed the feasibility of such treatments but, because of small samples (less than 20 patients in each study), efficiency and prognostic factors could not be addressed.

Exhaustive retrospective studies in a definite geographic area but with a sufficient number of patients in a limited inclusion period would provide these crucial data and address these questions with good relevance and limited bias.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Necker- Enfants Malades Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged less than 18 yo with arterial ischemic stroke and recanalization treatment at the acute phase, treated in France during the study period. Sample recruited from pediatric and adult databases of child neurology, stroke, and interventional radiology units

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years old
  • Suspected or confirmed cerebral infarction
  • With recanalization treatment in the acute phase : intravenous thrombolysis +/- intra-arterial thrombolysis +/- thrombectomy
  • Patients treated between the January 2015, 1st and the May 2018, 31st
  • Collection of non-opposition from legal representatives

Exclusion Criteria:

- Refusal of the patient's legal representative to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Arterial ischemic stroke in patients less than 18 years old

Patients < 18 years old

  • Suspected or confirmed cerebral infarction
  • With recanalization treatment in the acute phase: intra-venous thrombolysis +/- intra-arterial thrombolysis +/- thrombectomy
  • Patients treated between January 2015, 1st and May 2018, 31st

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute management of stroke:
Time Frame: 1 day
Median time from symptom onset to Imaging (minutes)
1 day
Acute management of stroke:
Time Frame: 1 day
Median time from symptom onset to beginning of recanalization treatment (minutes)
1 day
Acute management of stroke:
Time Frame: 1 day
Median door-to-needle delay (minutes)
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment-emergent adverse events:
Time Frame: 7 days
Intracranial hemorrhage (yes/no)
7 days
Treatment-emergent adverse events:
Time Frame: 7 days
clinically symptomatic (yes/no)
7 days
Treatment-emergent adverse events:
Time Frame: 7 days
Peripheral hemorrhage (yes/no)
7 days
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
age of onset (year, months)
12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
Mechanism of stroke (CASCADE classification)
12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
stroke location (name of artery territory)
12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months
time from symptom onset to beginning of recanalization treatment (minutes)
12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months

initial imagine ASPECT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score. score (units on an scale). The ASPECTS score is a 10-point quantitative topographic CT scan score used in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. I has also been adapted to be used with MR scans.

All scale ranges : Segmental assessment of the MCA vascular territory is made and 1 point is deducted from the initial score of 10 for every region involved (caudate, putamen, internal capsule, nsular cortex, M1(anterior MCA cortex=frontal operculum), M2(MCA cortex lateral to insular ribbon=anterior temporal lobe), M3(posterior MCA cortex=posterior temporal lobe, M4(anterior MCA territory immediately superior to M1), M5(lateral MCA territory immediately superior to M2), M6(posterior MCA territory immediately superior to M3)

For each scale, values better or worse :

In adults, an ASPECTS score less than or equal to 7 predicts a worse functional outcome at 3 months as well as symptomatic hemorrhage

12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months

Association with :Modified Rankin Scale - mRS (Units on a scale)The mRS is a 6-point quantitative measure of functional independence.

All scale ranges:

0=No symptoms at all

  1. No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities
  2. Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance
  3. Moderate
  4. Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
  5. Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention
  6. Dead

For each scales range, values better or worse :

In the literature, good outcome is usually considered for patients with mRS [0-2]. Very good outcome is considered for patients with mRS [0-1]. We will use the same thresholds

12 months
factors potentially associated with clinical outcome: univariate and multivariate analysis, step by step analysis
Time Frame: 12 months

Association with :

- The Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure - PSOM (Units on a scale) =scale has been designed and published to quantify functional consequences of stroke in children. The PSOM is a detailed neurological examination, with outcome scored in terms of degree of impairment in each of language, cognition, and sensorimotor. We wil use the PSOM-SNE version (PSOM-Short Neuro Exam version).

All scale ranges (0-0,5-1 or 2):

- Sensorimotor deficit, Language Deficit - Production, Language Deficit - Comprehension, Cognitive or Behavioural Deficit. Total score on 10

For each scale range, values better or worse:

Total impairment scores (out of a maximum of 10) will be considered as previously published, i.e. total score 0 or 0.5 representing good outcome, and poor outcome ≥1.

All subscales ranges (Normal, Anormal, Not Done):

Level of consciousness, Behaviour, mental status, Language, Cranial nerves, Motor testing, Tendon reflexes, Fine motor coordination, Sensory, Gate

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manoelle Kossorotoff, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 4, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arterial Ischemic Stroke

3
Subscribe