Quality of Life (HRQoL) of AIS Patients Who Require Bracing or Surgery Using SRS-22 Questionnaire (QolAISSRS22)

February 10, 2025 updated by: Dr. Alec Lik-Hang Hung, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Evaluation of Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Patients Who Require Bracing or Surgery Using SRS-22 Questionnaire

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is an unexpected curvature of spine at teenage. AIS causes mainly unpleasant appearance, and sometime comes with pain and difficult to locate or move around. When the spinal curve, or "Cobb angle", increases with time, the investigators call it severe condition when the Cobb angle is 60 degrees or above. The severe suffering patients need to be operated to correct their spinal curve by using metallic rods and metallic screws (implants) to fix the spine. In order to avoid this surgery, the investigators use "brace", a hard fitting case, trying to control the spinal curve degree by using forces from outside. (bracing) to intervene the spinal curve progression is highly recommended for patients with particular clinical characteristics. However, bracing is not always a present experience apart from function restriction. Clinical recommendation requires the patients to brace over 20 hours everyday, which means the patients have to be "braced" around the clock. Patients' perception on being "braced" all day, apart from discomforts under bracing, self-image and mental health after bracing are also important psycho-social factors which have yet to be addressed. Based on our clinical experience, 1-2% of AIS patients, undergoing bracing or not (i.e. at observation stage), require surgical intervention due to rapid spinal progression in a short period of time. By definition, surgery will be arranged for patients with major spinal curve ≥50. The use of health-related-quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaires allow clinical professionals to explore many different kinds of interests on patients, including the patient's feeling on his/her medical condition and satisfaction with provided care. Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) patient outcome tool has been a well-accepted HRQoL questionnaire to look for the perception of patients with spinal problems of their status. The SRS-22 questionnaire that has been well accepted as its trustworthy on the score results and SRS-22 is good to be used in patients under different conditions across the disease. This is very important to obtain and compare the scores over time in order to look for any consistent changes. Apart from AIS patients requiring bracing, surgical cases are also very important group of patients to monitor their quality of life before and after surgery, and every follow-up visit after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D deformity of spine happened with unidentifiable cause at teenage. AIS causes mainly cosmetic problems with a lesser incidence of functional deficit and pain. AIS patients under severe condition, defined as the major spinal curve angle named "Cobb angle" larger than 60 degrees, requires surgical intervention to the spinal curve with implants permanently applied along the spine. The use of "brace" (bracing) to intervene the spinal curve progression is highly recommended for patients with particular clinical characteristics. However, bracing is not always a present experience apart from function restriction. Clinical recommendation requires the patients to brace over 20 hours everyday, which means the patients have to be "braced" around the clock. Patients' perception on being "braced" all day, apart from discomforts under bracing, self-image and mental health after bracing are also important psycho-social factors which have yet to be addressed. Based on our clinical experience, 1-2% of AIS patients, undergoing bracing or not (i.e. at observation stage), require surgical intervention due to rapid spinal progression in a short period of time. By definition, surgery will be arranged for patients with major spinal curve ≥50 degrees.

The health-related-quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaires allow clinical professionals to explore many areas of interest, including the patient's perception of his/her condition and satisfaction with provided care. Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcomes Instrument has been an accepted HRQoL questionnaire to evaluate the perception of patients with spinal deformities of their status. The SRS-22 questionnaire that has been shown to have high reliability and concurrent validity and discrimination validity and responsiveness to change. SRS-22 questionnaire comprises 22 questions under 5 domains (function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction with management). Through these 22 questions, the psycho-social status can be quantified in terms of "scores" and the scores obtained at different time points can be compared. Continuous monitoring of these factors are important along the bracing period to look for patients with continuously poor psycho-social status of which bracing period is possibly last for years. Apart from AIS patients requiring bracing, surgical cases are also very important group of patients to monitor their quality of life before and after surgery, and every follow-up visit after surgery.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Alec Lik-Hang Hung, Dr.
  • Phone Number: (852)55699593
  • Email: hlh378@ha.org.hk

Study Locations

      • Sha Tin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Alec Lik-Hang Hung, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients visiting a specialized clinic at Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AIS patients who attend the scoliosis clinic at specialized outpatient clinic in Prince of Wales hospital and require wearing brace, or patients who suffer from severe scoliosis and require surgery on their first clinic visit
  • Can read and understand either English or Chinese

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To observe (i.e. not require to wear brace) after clinic visit
  • Cannot read or understand either English or Chinese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Bracing
AIS patients undergoing bracing to control the spinal curve progression
Wear a rigid brace
Surgical
Severe AIS patients requiring surgical intervention to correct the spinal curve
Surgical correction of spine using implants (metallic rods and metallic screws)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline SRS-22 Function score at 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Select 1 from 5 answers in each question. Scores from 1 to 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), the higher score the better outcome. A calculated score. "Function" score was calculated by adding the scores from questions 1 to 4.
Baseline and 1 year
Change from baseline SRS-22 Pain score at 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Select 1 from 5 answers in each question. Scores from 1 to 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), the higher score the better outcome. A calculated score. "Pain" score was calculated by adding the scores from questions 5 to 8.
Baseline and 1 year
Change from baseline SRS-22 Self-image score at 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Select 1 from 5 answers in each question. Scores from 1 to 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), the higher score the better outcome. A calculated score. "Self-image" score was calculated by adding the scores from questions 9 to 12.
Baseline and 1 year
Change from baseline SRS-22 Mental score at 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Select 1 from 5 answers in each question. Scores from 1 to 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), the higher score the better outcome. A calculated score. "Mental" score was calculated by adding the scores from questions 13 to 16.
Baseline and 1 year
Change from baseline SRS-22 Satisfaction score at 1 year
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Select 1 from 5 answers in each question. Scores from 1 to 5 (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), the higher score the better outcome. A calculated score. "Satisfaction" score was calculated by adding the scores from questions 17 to 20.
Baseline and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alec Lik-Hang Hung, Dr., Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe