Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Prevention of Acute Radiodermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (LABRA)

August 31, 2021 updated by: Prof. dr. Jeroen Mebis, Hasselt University

The Use of Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Prevention of Acute Radiodermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients: a Multicentre, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

Radiodermatitis (RD), an inflammatory skin reaction, occurs in more than 90 percent of cancer patients treated with radiotherapy (RT). This is the result of the radiation causing damage to the epidermal basal skin stem cells. Based on the severity of the skin symptoms, acute RD can be categorized into four grades ranging from red and dry skin to moist desquamation, necrosis, and eventually ulceration. Acute RD can be distressing, negatively influencing the patients' quality of life (QOL). In cases of severe RD, RT might be interrupted, affecting the treatment outcome.

Currently, there is no generally accepted treatment available for RD. As such, the standard skincare treatment is hospital dependent. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) can offer a solution, since the therapeutic use of (infra)red light induces photochemical reactions in the target cells, stimulating repair and healing processes, and reducing pain and inflammation.

Previous studies using PBMT to prevent RD showed promising results. However, these beneficial results need to be validated in a larger breast cancer patient population receiving an alternative RT regimen. The study hypothesizes that PBMT is a safe and effective strategy to prevent worsening of acute RD grade two or higher in breast cancer patients undergoing RT. The primary objective is to measure the degree of acute RD to detect changes during and after RT. Second, the patients' QOL and pain will be assessed. Finally, the third objective is to evaluate the safety of PBMT.

The results of this project will support the implementation of PBMT into the standard RD skincare program.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
        • Jessa Ziekenhuis
    • Limburg
      • Genk, Limburg, Belgium, 3600
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Campus St.-Jan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Diagnosis of non-invasive (stage 0) or invasive (stage 1, 2 and 3A) breast adenocarcinoma
  • Treatment with primary breast-sparing surgery (lumpectomy) and/or neoadjuvant (preoperative) or adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy or hormonal therapy
  • Scheduled for postoperative radiotherapy at Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk:
  • Hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (i.e. 16 daily fractions of 2.66 Gray to the whole breast followed by a boost of 5 fractions of 2.66 Gray to the tumor bed, 5x/week)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for postoperative radiotherapy at Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
  • Previous irradiation to the same breast
  • Metastatic disease
  • Concurrent chemotherapy
  • Required use of bolus material to deliver radiotherapy (i.e material placed on the to-be- irradiated zone to modulate the delivered dose in order to ensure an optimal distribution of the radiation dose; mostly used for treatment of superficial tumors)
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psyschological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant
  • Seizure
  • Disorders triggered by lighttake anticoagulants
  • Hemorrhagic diatheses
  • Pregnancy
  • Suspected of carrying serious infectious disease
  • HIV positive history

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Control group
Receives sham laser (2x/week) in combination with standard skin care starting from day 1 of radiotherapy
Sham laser sessions will be applied 2x/week after RT.
Experimental: Treatment group
Receives PBMT (2x/week) in combination with standard skin care starting from day 1 of radiotherapy
PBMT sessions will be planned 2x/week after RT.
Other Names:
  • Low-level light therapy (LLLT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 1
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 1
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 2
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 2
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 3
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 3
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 4
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 4
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 5
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 5
Radiation Dermatitis Grade
Time Frame: week 6
Objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC) objective scoring of the severity of radiation dermatitis using the grading system of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/ European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/ EORTC)
week 6
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 1
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS)
week 1
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 2
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS 0-4)
week 2
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 3
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS 0-4)
week 3
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 4
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS 0-4)
week 4
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 5
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS 0- 4)
week 5
Radiation Dermatitis Assessment
Time Frame: week 6
Radiation dermatitis assessment scale (Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale, RISRAS (0 - 4)
week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 1
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 1
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 2
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 2
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 3
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 3
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 4
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 4
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 5
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 5
Pain evaluation: VAS
Time Frame: week 6
Patients' pain due to radiodermatitis will be evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). A VAS is a laminated plastic with descriptors at each end. The patients will be asked to move the sliding marker along the plastic to indicate their subjective experience of pain. Each mark is associated with a certain pain score. A VAS is a well documented, valid, and frequently used measure of pain intensity.
week 6
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 1
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 1
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 2
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 2
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 3
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 3
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 4
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 4
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 5
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 5
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: week 6
The Skindex-16 questionnaire will be used to assess patients quality of life. This is the most appropriate questionnaire that accurately and sensitively measures to what extent the patients' life is affected by their skin condition.
week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jolien Robijns, PhD, Hasselt University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Sham laser

3
Subscribe