- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03925389
Outcome Analysis in Septorhinoplasty
Functional and Aesthetic Outcome Analysis in External Septorhinoplasty
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Introduction:
In an ENT setting, septorhinoplasty is frequently performed for both functional and aesthetic reasons. Therefore, pre- and postoperative evaluation of patients' 'total' satisfaction regarding their nasal appearance and functional result is paramount.
Objectives:
To measure the pre- and postoperative functional and aesthetic outcome in patients undergoing an external septorhinoplasty.
Design, setting, participants:
A prospective observational, longitudinal outcome cohort study in a single private hospital centre is set up. All participants are patients undergoing an external septorhinoplasty for functional and aesthetic reasons.
Exposures:
The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE), Utrecht questionnaire, the FACE-Q Satisfaction With Nose, FACE-Q Satisfaction With Nostrils, SCHNOS score and BDDQ-AS score, are administered to patients preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Also functional tests (nasal anterior rhinomanometry (NAR), Peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and acoustic rhinometry (AR) will be performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months. Patient demographics, nasal history, and outcomes will be analyzed.
Main outcome and measures:
The primary outcome will measure longitudinal postoperative changes in nasal obstruction and aesthetic satisfaction:
- Change between pre- and postoperative results of NOSE and FACE-Q questionnaires, Utrecht questionnaire, SCHNOS and BDDQ-AS score (time frame: at inclusion and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively)
- Change between pre- and postoperative values of NAR, PNIF and acoustic rhinometry (time frame: at inclusion and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively)
Secondary outcome
- Correlation between PROMS and functional tests
- Correlation between change in functional tests and the surgical methods used
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Frank Declau, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +3232831500
- Email: nko@telenet.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerp, Belgium, 2018
- Recruiting
- Dept. Otorhinolaryngology, H&N Surgery
-
Contact:
- Frank Declau, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +3232831500
- Email: nko@telenet.be
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Valérie Verkest, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Laura Pingnet, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- at least 18 years old
- Patients eligible for external septorhinoplasty: patients seen in consultation because of nasal obstruction were evaluated. Patients who had symptoms of nasal obstruction for at least 1 year that were the result of an identifiable anatomical cause such as septal deviation, turbinate hypertrophy, internal valve collapse, or external valve collapse were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- < 18 years
- mental or physical incapacity to answer the questionnaires
- nasal fracture or surgery in the past year
- nasal cocaine use in the past year
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in aesthetic satisfaction using FACE-Q (TM) questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative results of FACE-Q questionnaire. • FACE-Q (TM): Two items of the FACE-Q (TM) instrument (satisfaction with nose and satisfaction with nostrils) are used:
|
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in nasal obstruction using NOSE questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative results of NOSE questionnaire. • NOSE (Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness Scale): scale from 0 (no nasal obstruction) to 100 (severe nasal obstruction). |
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in nasal obstruction using acoustic rhinometry
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative acoustic rhinometry: •AR (acoustic rhinometry): minimal cross-sectional area (cm2) (MCA) is measured for each nostril separately. |
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in nasal obstruction using peak nasal inspiratory flow:
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative peak nasal inspiratory flow: •PNIF (peak nasal inspiratory flow): peak nasal inspiratory flow (l/min) is measured for each nostril separately. |
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in nasal obstruction using rhinomanometry
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative rhinomanometry : •NAR(nasal anterior rhinomanometry) : nasal airflow at 150 Pa is recorded for each nostril separately (ml/sec). |
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in aesthetic satisfaction Utrecht Questionnaire: 6 items scale: - 5 items with Likert scale from 5 (not at all) to 25 very (often) - 1 item: VAS score from 0 (very ugly) to 10 (very nice)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative results of Utrecht questionnaire.
|
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in aesthetic satisfaction and nasal obstruction using the SCHNOS Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative results of SCHNOS questionnaire. 10 items scale from 0 (no problem) to 5 (severe problem).
|
12 months
|
|
Measurement of pre- and postoperative changes in aesthetic satisfaction using the BDD (Body Dysmorphic Disorder) Questionnaire. 7 items scale: item 1-2 : dichotomous (yes/no) Item 3-6: 1(mild) to 5 (extreme) Item 7: dichotomous (yes/no)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Change between pre- and postoperative results of BDD questionnaire.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation between NOSE questionnaire and nasal functional tests
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Correlation between: NOSE (Nasal Obstruction and Septoplasty Effectiveness Scale): scale from 0 (no nasal obstruction) to 100 (severe nasal obstruction). and: NAR(nasal active rhinomanometry) : nasal airflow at 150 Pa is recorded for each nostril separately (ml/sec). PNIF (peak nasal inspiratory flow): peak nasal inspiratory flow (l/min) is measured for each nostril separately. AR (acoustic rhinometry): minimal cross-sectional area (cm2) (MCA) is measured for each nostril. |
12 months
|
|
Correlation between change of nasal functional tests and surgical methods
Time Frame: 12 months
|
NAR(nasal active rhinomanometry) : nasal airflow at 150 Pa is recorded for each nostril separately (ml/sec). PNIF (peak nasal inspiratory flow): peak nasal inspiratory flow (l/min) is measured for each nostril separately. AR (acoustic rhinometry): minimal cross-sectional area (cm2) (MCA) is measured for each nostril. and: surgical data acquired from the operative report from each patient: technical procedures undertaken to improve nasal obstruction by addressing the anatomic structures that comprise the internal and/or external nasal valves. |
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Frank Declau, MD, PhD, Universiteit Antwerpen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pingnet L, Verkest V, Fransen E, Declau F. Dutch Translation and Validation of the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Module. Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;37(3):296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721099. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
- Valérie Verkest, Laura Pİngnet, Erik Fransen, Frank Declau. Analysis of functional and aesthetic outcomes in external septorhinoplasty: study protocol. B-ENT 2020; 16: 45-50 DOI: 10.5152/B-ENT.2020.19125
- Declau F, Pingnet L, Verkest V, Hansen T. Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Dutch FACE-Q Rhinoplasty Questionnaires Using Rasch Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):NP1916-NP1930. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab217.
- Verkest V, Pingnet L, Fransen E, Declau F. Piezo-assisted Turbinoplasty Versus Partial Turbinectomy in External Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective Comparative Study in 100 Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1323-1331. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02662-0. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Pingnet L, Verkest V , Saltychev M , Most SP , Declau F. Translation and Validation of the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey in Dutch. B-ENT 2022; 18: 170-175. doi: 10.5152/B-ENT.2022.22910.
- Verkest V, Pingnet L, Fransen E, Declau F. Multidimensionality of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinoplasty Satisfaction. Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Oct;38(5):468-476. doi: 10.1055/a-1760-1422. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- FDSV02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.