Efficacy of a Brief Intervention for School Clinicians (BRISC) (BRISC)

Efficacy of a Brief Intervention Strategy for School Mental Health Clinicians (BRISC)

Research shows that the majority of all mental health (MH) treatment for children is delivered in schools. Unfortunately, however, school mental health (SMH) providers rarely use evidence-based approaches and are often poorly integrated into the school context. Given the high (>20%) and increasing rates of MH disorders among children and youth, MH clinicians working in schools need effective and efficient ways to address student emotional and behavioral problems. The Brief Intervention Strategy for School Clinicians (BRISC) is a four-session, flexible, and research-informed "Tier 2" intervention tailored to high school students and designed to fit the school context. Findings from initial research funded by an IES Development and Innovation grant, including a small (n=66) comparison study, indicate positive, small to large sized effects (ES = .30- 1.33) in favor of BRISC for MH impairment, emotional symptoms, therapeutic alliance, coping skills, and client satisfaction. Moreover, even though the majority of students who were referred to BRISC were in the clinical range for functional impairment due to MH problems, over 50% were able to step down to lower levels of intervention after four sessions of BRISC, demonstrating promise for efficiency and reach. Given potential for public health impact, the purpose of the current study is to further examine the efficacy of BRISC by assessing its impact on mental health and academic outcomes - as well as feasibility, acceptability, and efficiency - in a larger, multi-site trial.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Emotional/Behavioral Function; Academic Performance
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: BRISC; Behavioral: SAU

Detailed Description

Fostering emotional and behavioral well-being is critical to school success, and research shows that over 70% of all mental health treatment for children is delivered in schools. Thus, school mental health (SMH) services are a fundamental component of our nation's strategy to ensure academic and life success of our children and youth. Unfortunately, SMH providers rarely use evidence-based approaches and are often poorly integrated into the school context. SMH providers carry large caseloads, experience time constraints, and serve youth with a broad array of needs. For SMH to live up to its potential, individuals who provide SMH treatment must be equipped with effective and efficient ways to address student emotional and behavioral needs.

The purpose of this project is to conduct a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Brief Intervention Strategy for School Clinicians (BRISC). BRISC is a fully developed, manualized intervention strategy for use by professionals working individually with high school students experiencing mental health symptoms or other emotional and behavioral stressors that negatively affect their ability to succeed academically. With funding from an IES Development and Innovation grant (R305A120128), BRISC was developed as a brief, evidence-based, and flexible "Tier 2" intervention designed to fit the high school context. Findings from a small (N=66) comparison study indicate positive, small to large sized effects (ES = .30 - 1.33) in favor of BRISC over SMH services as usual (SAU) for a range of short and longer-term outcomes (see Section A9). The study also found high clinician fidelity to BRISC, increased clinician use of evidence-based strategies, high ratings of feasibility, and very low ratings of research burden. Moreover, even though the majority of students who were referred to BRISC were in the clinical range for functional impairment due to MH problems, over 50% were able to step down to lower levels of intervention after four sessions of BRISC, demonstrating promise for efficiency and reach. The current study aims to further examine the efficacy of BRISC, the mediators and moderators that may further influence its development, and to illuminate how and under what conditions BRISC is effective. A cluster randomized design has been used to assign 52 schools in Washington, Minnesota, and Maryland to BRISC or SAU (520 students total; 260 per group).

This efficacy project has six research aims:

1. To test the effects of BRISC on hypothesized short-term service outcomes such as clinician use of evidence-based strategies and standardized assessment data, therapeutic alliance, student service satisfaction, retention in services, and service referrals.
2. To test the effects of BRISC on hypothesized short-term student outcomes, such as problem-solving, coping skills, school engagement, school attendance, and homework completion.
3. To test the effects of BRISC on longer-term outcomes such as MH symptoms, emotional/behavioral functioning, peer/family relations, discipline problems at school, and academic performance.
4. To examine the impact of BRISC on treatment efficiency, in terms of trajectory of student change in outcomes over time.
5. To confirm that BRISC is perceived as an appropriate, feasible, and acceptable intervention for use by SMH clinicians working in a diverse array of high schools.
6. To examine hypothesized moderators and mediators of outcomes, including service factors (e.g., fidelity, service dosage/duration, clinician orientation, receipt of other services), student factors (e.g., age, gender, problem type and severity), and proximal outcomes (e.g., problem-solving skills, coping strategies, school engagement).

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 850
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Washington
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98115
      • University of Washington School Mental Health Assessment, Research, and Training (SMART) Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Clinicians

Inclusion Criteria:

• SMH clinicians from a MH provider agency dedicated at .50 FTE to MH treatment (to ensure adequate integration in the school and students for the study) OR school counselors who are employed by the school district
• SMH clinicians or school counselors not currently receiving support to implement another specific intervention model
• Master's or Ph.D.-level mental health counselors

Exclusion Criteria:

- SMH clinicians with previous BRISC exposure

Students

Inclusion Criteria:

• Students must be age 14-21 years and enrolled in high school
• Students who are seeking or referred to services for the first time in the current school year, to minimize confusion about for which service episode measures should be completed
• English must be the first or primary language of the students
• If student is under 18 years old, a parent or legal guardian must consent for the student to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

• Students receiving Special Education services due to cognitive disability, due to inappropriateness of BRISC for youth with these disorders
• Students in foster care, due to challenges in obtaining consent to participate from public child welfare systems who serve as guardians
• Students who present currently in a crisis situation (defer to clinician's clinical judgment)

Parents/Guardians

Inclusion Criteria:

• Biological parent or legal guardian
• Must be English or Spanish speaking.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Parents who only speak any languages other than English or Spanish

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention (BRISC) Group; Clinicians randomly assigned to BRISC will implement a flexible intervention that, over four sessions, aims to assess and engage student clients, and identify and address student identified difficulties that are distressing and impacting academic performance/behavior, social, and overall functioning. BRISC uses an explicit, problem-solving structure and a range of techniques common to evidence-based practices (EBP) tailored to the identified needs of the student.	Behavioral: BRISC
Active Comparator: Services as Usual (SAU) Group; Clinicians in the SAU condition will use a diverse array of "treatment as usual" strategies over four sessions that may include some directive, skill-building techniques common in EBPs, but, given findings from pilot studies and studies of mental health services "as usual" in community and school settings, are likely to be provided at an overall lower rate, and at lower intensity, than in BRISC or other EBP.	Behavioral: SAU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Internal and External Symptoms	The Brief Problem Checklist (BPC) is a youth/parent 12-item questionnaire adapted from items on the CBCL (Child Behavior Checklist) and YSR (Youth Self Report) designed to assess internalizing and externalizing behaviors with items measured on 0-2 scale. Subscale and total scores are mean scores of items with a range of 0-2. Higher scores reflect less favorable outcomes.	Pre-intervention/baseline, 2-week follow-up, post-intervention/2 months, 4-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
Change in Symptoms of Depression	The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely-used, brief 9-item scale that queries about the presence depressive disorder symptoms with items on a 0-3 scale. Total scores are summed scores of items with a range of 0-27. Higher scores reflect more severe levels of depression.	Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention/2 months, 6-month follow-up
Change in Symptoms of Anxiety	The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) is a widely-used, brief 7-item scale that queries about anxiety symptoms with items on a 0-3 scale. Total scores are summed scores of items with a range of 0-21. Higher scores reflect more severe levels of anxiety.	Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention/2 months, 6-month follow-up
Change in Overall Mental Health Function	The Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS) is a 13-item scale that measures adolescents' level of adaptive functioning with items on a 0-4 scale. Total scores are summed scores of items with a range of 0-52. Higher scores reflect less favorable outcomes.	Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention/2 months, 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in School Engagement	The Student Engagement Instrument (SEI) is a widely-used 35-item instrument that assesses engagement, a malleable determinant of high school success, with items on a scale of 0-3. SEI yields scores on six factors: teacher-student relationships, control and relevance of school work, peer support for learning, future aspirations and goals, family, support for learning, and extrinsic reward. Subscale and total scores are averaged scores of items with a range of 0-3. Higher scores reflect better outcomes.	Pre-intervention/baseline, post-intervention/2 months, 6-month follow-up
Youth Satisfaction with Services	The Multidimensional Adolescent Satisfaction Scale (MASS) is a 21-item measure of client satisfaction with the services they receive from their mental health provider. The MASS includes four factors: counselor qualities, meeting needs, effectiveness, and counselor conflict. Items are on a 1-4 scale. Subscale and total scores are averaged scores of items with a range of 0-4. Higher scores reflect higher satisfaction with services.	2-month follow-up after baseline
Therapeutic Alliance	The Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Adolescents (TASA) is a widely used, 12-item scale designed to measure the working alliance between clinicians and their adolescent clients with items on a 1-6 scale. The scale covers three domains: bond, goals, and tasks. Subscale and total scores are averaged scores of items with a range of 1-6. Higher scores reflect better alliance.	2-month follow-up after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Washington
• Collaborators: Institute of Education Sciences

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2019
• Study Completion (Anticipated): June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: April 24, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 2, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): May 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 6, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 2, 2019
• Last Verified: May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: children's mental health; school mental health; evidence-based practice (EBP); academic success
• Other Study ID Numbers: 52229; R305A160111 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Institute of Education Sciences)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No