Nutrition Education Program for Postoperative Patients With Gastric Cancer

The Effect of Nutrition Education Program on the Nutrition Status and Life Quality of Postoperative Patients With Gastric Cancer

Using randomized control study, explore the effect of standardized nutrition education program on the nutrition status and life quality of patients with gastric cancer after surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 31009
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are diagnosed with gastric cancer and receive operation.
  • Patients need nutrition support treatment
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Critical patients or stage IV
  • Patients with severe hepatic cirrhosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, chronic renal failure, intestinal obstruction, stroke.
  • Unconscious or psychiatric patients
  • Patients with communication problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: experimental group
Give nutrition health education every two weeks and regular survey and intervention. The education booklets are made based on the guideline and characteristics of the disease.
Active Comparator: control group
Give nutrition education if the patient visits the clinics. Irregular survey and intervention were given to the patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
risk of malnutrition
Time Frame: Week 0
Nutrition Rsik Screening 2002 is used to assess the risk of malnutrition.
Week 0
risk of malnutrition
Time Frame: Week 12
Nutrition Rsik Screening 2002 is used to assess the risk of malnutrition.
Week 12
BMI
Time Frame: Week 0
Body mass index is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. It equals to weight divided by height square.
Week 0
BMI
Time Frame: Week 12
Body mass index is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women. It equals to weight divided by height square.
Week 12
albumin
Time Frame: Week 0
level of serum albumin
Week 0
albumin
Time Frame: Week 12
level of serum albumin
Week 12
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Week 0
The QOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) simplified Chinese version. It contains five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptoms scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health scale, a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and financial impact of the disease. For most items, four response categories from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) are employed; two items (overall health, overall quality of life) have response categories ranging from 1 to 7. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale, the global health status or overall QOL represents a high or healthy status or a high QOL; however, a high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptom.
Week 0
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Week 12
The QOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) simplified Chinese version. It contains five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptoms scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health scale, a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and financial impact of the disease. For most items, four response categories from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) are employed; two items (overall health, overall quality of life) have response categories ranging from 1 to 7. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale, the global health status or overall QOL represents a high or healthy status or a high QOL; however, a high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptom.
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
physical function status
Time Frame: Week 0
Using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess the physical function.
Week 0
physical function status
Time Frame: Week 12
Using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess the physical function.
Week 12
Knowledge-Attitude-Practice
Time Frame: Week 12
Knowledge Scale composes of 10 questions and 10 scores for each question. Attitude and Practice Scale have 5 questions. Each question is rated as A、B、C. A represents 20 score and B is 10 score.
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe