- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03952442
Nutrition Education Program for Postoperative Patients With Gastric Cancer
May 19, 2019 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
The Effect of Nutrition Education Program on the Nutrition Status and Life Quality of Postoperative Patients With Gastric Cancer
Using randomized control study, explore the effect of standardized nutrition education program on the nutrition status and life quality of patients with gastric cancer after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
200
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 31009
- Recruiting
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Haiyan Zhou, Bachelor
- Phone Number: 13857160575
- Email: 731061631@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients are diagnosed with gastric cancer and receive operation.
- Patients need nutrition support treatment
- Informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Critical patients or stage IV
- Patients with severe hepatic cirrhosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, chronic renal failure, intestinal obstruction, stroke.
- Unconscious or psychiatric patients
- Patients with communication problems
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: experimental group
|
Give nutrition health education every two weeks and regular survey and intervention.
The education booklets are made based on the guideline and characteristics of the disease.
|
|
Active Comparator: control group
|
Give nutrition education if the patient visits the clinics.
Irregular survey and intervention were given to the patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
risk of malnutrition
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Nutrition Rsik Screening 2002 is used to assess the risk of malnutrition.
|
Week 0
|
|
risk of malnutrition
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Nutrition Rsik Screening 2002 is used to assess the risk of malnutrition.
|
Week 12
|
|
BMI
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Body mass index is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women.
It equals to weight divided by height square.
|
Week 0
|
|
BMI
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Body mass index is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women.
It equals to weight divided by height square.
|
Week 12
|
|
albumin
Time Frame: Week 0
|
level of serum albumin
|
Week 0
|
|
albumin
Time Frame: Week 12
|
level of serum albumin
|
Week 12
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Week 0
|
The QOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) simplified Chinese version.
It contains five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptoms scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health scale, a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and financial impact of the disease.
For most items, four response categories from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) are employed; two items (overall health, overall quality of life) have response categories ranging from 1 to 7. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale, the global health status or overall QOL represents a high or healthy status or a high QOL; however, a high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptom.
|
Week 0
|
|
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: Week 12
|
The QOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life version 3 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) simplified Chinese version.
It contains five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptoms scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), a global health scale, a number of single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea) and financial impact of the disease.
For most items, four response categories from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much) are employed; two items (overall health, overall quality of life) have response categories ranging from 1 to 7. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Thus a high score for a functional scale, the global health status or overall QOL represents a high or healthy status or a high QOL; however, a high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptom.
|
Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
physical function status
Time Frame: Week 0
|
Using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess the physical function.
|
Week 0
|
|
physical function status
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Using Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group to assess the physical function.
|
Week 12
|
|
Knowledge-Attitude-Practice
Time Frame: Week 12
|
Knowledge Scale composes of 10 questions and 10 scores for each question.
Attitude and Practice Scale have 5 questions.
Each question is rated as A、B、C.
A represents 20 score and B is 10 score.
|
Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 21, 2019
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
October 30, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 31, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 14, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 16, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 21, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2019
Last Verified
May 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-211
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.