Motor Control Training in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome

April 29, 2021 updated by: Jamilson Simões Brasileiro, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Motor Control Training in Individuals With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial

The porpusose of this study is to evaluate the repercussions of a motor control exercise protocol in patients with subacromial pain syndrome without indication of surgical repair.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial which will be composed of volunteers of both genders, aged between 35 and 60 years. All volunteers will undergo pre-assessment (Av1): pain sensation, pain and function, shoulder range of motion, muscle strength, electromyographic activity and kinematics of the shoulder complex. After the initial evaluation, the volunteers will be randomly divided into two groups to carry out the intervention: exercises (GE - conventional exercises with elastic band) and motor control (GCM - motor control training). The intervention protocol will last eight weeks. After four weeks, the second assessment (AV2), similar to AV1, will be performed and the global change perception questionnaire will be added. At the end of the intervention protocol, the third evaluation (AV3), similar to AV2, will be performed. A follow-up will be performed after 4 weeks of the end of the intervention protocol, with the assessment being equal to AV3.

The project will be submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte through the national interface "Plataforma Brasil". The study will also be registered on the international clinical trial platform, ClinicalTrials.gov. The study will only begin after approval of the ethics and research committee. All volunteers should read and sign the terms of free and informed consent.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RN
      • Natal, RN, Brazil, 59140-840
        • Jamilson S Brasileiro
      • Parnamirim, RN, Brazil, 59152820
        • Karinna Sonálya Aires da Costa

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Present subacromial pain with a score greater than or equal to 2 (Visual Analog Scale) for more than 2 months;
  • Positive Neer test;
  • Positive Hawkins test;
  • Positive Jobe test (pain);
  • Positive Patte test (pain);
  • Involvement of the supraspinatus and / or infraspinatus tendon (without degenerative characteristics) confirmed by Magnetic Nuclear Resonance (MRI) examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intense pain during the evaluations;
  • Fail to properly perform the evaluation procedures;
  • Two consecutive or five alternating absences during the training protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: motor control training
8-week exercise program, twice a week, with motor control training
The volunteers of the motor control group will initiate the exercises on a stable and rigid basis. These will be progressed with adding an unstable base as the volunteer gains motor learning (between the fourth and fifth week of the protocol). For the motor control group, two sets of 10 repetitions will be performed keeping in isometry for ten seconds each repetition.
Active Comparator: exercises
8-week exercise program, twice a week.
the protocol of strengthening and will have five elastic bands with different resistances available (extra-light, light, moderate, strong and extra-strong) for elbow flexion exercises progression, medial rotation and lateral rotation of the shoulder and scapular retraction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder pain
Time Frame: Change from baseline in shoulder pain at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Evaluation of pain level in the shoulder using the Numerical Pain Scale, graded from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates absence of pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.
Change from baseline in shoulder pain at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Shoulder function
Time Frame: Change from baseline in shoulder function at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Evaluation of shoulder pain and function using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The questionnaire is a self-administered region-specific outcome instrument developed as a measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms. The DASH consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100. The higher the score, the greater the functional disability.
Change from baseline in shoulder function at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Root Mean Square (RMS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline in RMS at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Analyze of the electromyographic activity of the muscles shoulder complex, after 4 and 8 weeks of the protocol and a follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol, by Root Mean Square (RMS)
Change from baseline in RMS at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
The kinematics of the scapula
Time Frame: Change from baseline in kinematics of the scapular girdle at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Analyze the kinematics of the scapula and glenohumeral in the slow and habitual movements after 8 weeks of the protocol and a follow up of 4 weeks.
Change from baseline in kinematics of the scapular girdle at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Peak of muscular torque
Time Frame: Change from baseline in peak of muscular torque at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Evaluate the peak of muscular torque, by means of the manual dynamometer 8 weeks of the protocol and a follow up of 4 weeks.
Change from baseline in peak of muscular torque at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Peak torque time
Time Frame: Change from baseline in peak torque time at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Evaluate the peak torque time, using the manual dynamometer 8 weeks of the protocol and a follow up of 4 weeks.
Change from baseline in peak torque time at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Range of motion
Time Frame: Change from baseline in range of motion at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol
Measure the range of motion for flexion, hyperextension, internal and external shoulder rotation 8 weeks of protocol and a follow up of 4 weeks, through the inclinometer.
Change from baseline in range of motion at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and follow up of 4 weeks after the intervention protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain

Clinical Trials on motor control training

Subscribe