Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Department

October 9, 2020 updated by: University of Manitoba

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Pain Management in Emergency Department Patients With Rib Fractures

Rib fractures are a common cause of respiratory distress in trauma patients as poor pain control and subsequent hypoventilation commonly results in lung tissue collapse (atelectasis). The current mainstay of treatment in rib fractures are oral and intravenous opioids however these are often ineffective and can also precipitate hypoventilation. Recently there has been interest in regional anaesthesia techniques for managing painful conditions of the thorax as a way to avoid pain and opioid related hypoventilation. These techniques include ultrasound guided nerve blocks such as the intercostal, paravertebral and serratus anterior blocks. The use of these techniques is however limited by minimal dermatomal coverage as well as a high incidence of complications The erector spinae plane block is a new, very promising technique which offers a safe means of providing anaesthesia to a large part of the hemithorax with a single injection. The proposed study will seek to establish whether the erector spinae plane block can be successfully used in the emergency department for pain control in patients with acute rib fractures.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rib fractures represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Hypoventilation secondary to pain and altered breathing mechanics frequently leads to respiratory distress and may necessitate admission to an ICU. Currently, opioids are the mainstay of treatment in rib fracture pain management however they are often ineffective and themselves can also promote hypoventilation. A more effective means of analgesia in rib fractures is the use of regional anaesthesia techniques including ultrasound (US) guided nerve blocks. Multiple studies have shown promising results with the use of US guided intercostal nerve blocks, paravertebral blocks and serratus anterior blocks for acute and long-term pain control in rib fractures, however each of these techniques has significant drawbacks including being limited to single dermatomes, high incidence of complications, and incomplete analgesia of the hemithorax. Recently, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has come to the forefront as a potential safe and effective option for analgesia in painful conditions of the thorax. This technique involves identifying the erector spinae muscles at the level of a given thoracic transverse process and injecting local anaesthetic into the fascial plane (Figures 1, 2, and 3); the local anaesthetic then spreads through the fascial plane both cephalad and caudad to the injection point and will anaesthetize the thoracic sensory nerves that run in this plane at multiple dermatomal levels (Figure 4). Moreover, because the target point of injection is both superficial and protected by the bony transverse process the incidence of complications is felt to be low. While this technique has been successfully used in the field of anaesthesiology, the ESPB has yet to be integrated into the practice of emergency medicine physicians. In fact, only one paper has detailed it's use for acute pain control in the emergency department (ED; 7). Given the high morbidity associated with rib fractures, the inadequacy of opioid analgesia and the strong safety profile of the ESPB, the proposed study seeks to address whether this block can be used to provide analgesia in ED patients with acute rib fractures. This first study will provide proof of concept that this technique is a useful and safe technique for emergency providers to use.

Objectives To address whether the ESPB can successfully be used for analgesia in ED patients with rib fractures.

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will be a safe and effective means of analgesia in ED patients with rib fractures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A1R9
        • Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with acute rib fractures failing traditional therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over the age of 18
  • Acute rib fractures with pain that is subjectively poorly controlled despite oral and/or intravenous opioids.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability,
  • Active infection overlying the site of injection
  • Patients receiving anticoagulation
  • Patients with a history of a bleeding disorder
  • Patients with thrombocytopenia
  • Pregnant, are incarcerated
  • Decline the procedure
  • Inability to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain scale
Time Frame: 30-60 minutes
Pain scale with be taken pre- and post-block and regular intervals. The visual analogue pain scale ranges from 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worse pain imaginable. Lower numerical scores are better for outcomes as it implies that the pain is more well managed.
30-60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nerve Block

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae Block

3
Subscribe