- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04213157
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Tumors
December 27, 2019 updated by: Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek, Samsun Liv Hospital
Evaluation Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes of Patients Underwent Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Tumor
The aim of the study is to evaluate trifecta and pentafecta outcomes for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LNP) in patients with clinical T1N0M0 renal tumor.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Detailed Description
From November 2009 to August 2018 a total of 292 patients who underwent LPN by global ischemia were included in the study.
The patients were allocated into two groups according to the tumor size; T1a (≤ 40 mm, n=215), T1b (41-70 mm, n=77).
Demographics features, clinical tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.
A negative surgical margin, warm ischemia time (WIT) < 20 min and no postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade 3) were accepted to achieve the trifecta outcomes.
Pentafecta has defined as trifecta criteria plus >90% preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and no stage upgrade of chronic kidney disease 12 months after LPN.
Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to identify factors predicting trifecta and pentafecta achievement.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
292
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Samsun, Turkey, 55030
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
-
Samsun, Turkey, 55020
- Liv Hospital Samsun
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 82 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Two hundred ninety-two patients who have a follow-up at least 12 months were included in the study.
Those were allocated into two groups according to radiological tumor size; 215 patients with tumor size ≤ 40 mm were included in group T1a and 77 patients with tumor size 41-70 mm were included in group T1b.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Functioning contraleteral kidney
- Patients with complete data
- Patients with single renal tumor on the effected side
- Patients who approved the written consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patients with bilateral renal tumors (n=8, 16 LPNs)
- solitary kidney (n=8)
- horseshoe kidney (n=4)
- pelvic ectopic kidney (n=2)
- graft kidney (n=2)
- those with multiple renal tumors in a single kidney (n=3) or with > 7 cm renal tumor (n=6)
- Patients who were operated on for colon cancer (n=4), prostate cancer (n=2), endometrial cancer (n=1) or adrenal mass (n=2) within the first year after LPN
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: at the end of the surgery
|
time from onset to complete of surgery
|
at the end of the surgery
|
|
Blood loss
Time Frame: at the end of the surgery
|
amount of bleeding during surgery (mL)
|
at the end of the surgery
|
|
warm ischemia time
Time Frame: at the and of the surgery
|
The clamp time of the renal artery and vein which is required to complete tumor excision and renorrhaphy
|
at the and of the surgery
|
|
intraoperative complication
Time Frame: at the end of the surgery
|
abnormal problmes that may be seen during surgery
|
at the end of the surgery
|
|
Postoperative complication
Time Frame: up to 3 months
|
abnormal problmes that may be seen after surgery and require additional intervention, treatment or follow-up
|
up to 3 months
|
|
functional outcomes
Time Frame: up to 1 year postoperatively
|
serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate
|
up to 1 year postoperatively
|
|
surigcal margin status
Time Frame: up to 1 month postoperatively
|
presence or absence of tumors at the surgical margin
|
up to 1 month postoperatively
|
|
Relative decrease in renal function
Time Frame: up to 1 year postoperatively
|
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative renal functions according to numerical and percentile values
|
up to 1 year postoperatively
|
|
CKD stage upgrading
Time Frame: up to 1 year postoperatively
|
evaluation of preoperative and postoperative renal functions according to chronic kidney disease stages
|
up to 1 year postoperatively
|
|
Oncological outomes
Time Frame: up to the last clinical control (months)
|
Presence or absence of local and/or distal tumor recurrence
|
up to the last clinical control (months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Saban Sarıkaya, Professor, Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Study Director: Ender Ozden, Professor, Ondokuz Mayıs University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Fiori C. Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics. BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1125-32. doi: 10.1111/bju.12317. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
- Minervini A, Siena G, Antonelli A, Bianchi G, Bocciardi AM, Cosciani Cunico S, Ficarra V, Fiori C, Fusco F, Mari A, Martorana G, Medica M, Mirone V, Morgia G, Porpiglia F, Rocco F, Rovereto B, Schiavina R, Simeone C, Terrone C, Volpe A, Carini M, Serni S; Members of the RECORd Project-LUNA Foundation. Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project). World J Urol. 2014 Feb;32(1):257-63. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
- Osaka K, Makiyama K, Nakaigawa N, Yao M. Predictors of trifecta outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses. Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1000-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12893. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
- Rais-Bahrami S, Romero FR, Lima GC, Kohanim S, Permpongkosol S, Trock BJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR. Elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors >4 cm. Urology. 2008 Sep;72(3):580-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.027. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
- Mercimek MN, Ozden E, Gulsen M, Yakupoglu YK, Bostanci Y, Sarikaya S. Which Is the Best Predictor to Achieve Trifecta in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Global Hilar Clamping? Comparative Analysis in Patients with Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Tumors. J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):615-622. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0758. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 15, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 30, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
November 10, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 25, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 25, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
December 30, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 2, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 27, 2019
Last Verified
December 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- OMU KAEK 2019/241
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
IPD Plan Description
It is not yet known if there will be a plan to make IPD available.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Kidney Neoplasms
-
Philips HealthcareWithdrawnKidney TumorsUnited States
-
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical UniversitySaint Petersburg State University, RussiaCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedKidney TumorUnited States
-
Tianjin Medical University Second HospitalRecruiting
-
Tianjin Medical University Second HospitalRecruiting
-
Thomas MuellerUnknownKidney Neoplasms | Adult Polycystic Kidney Disease | Kidney DysfunctionSwitzerland
-
Intuitive SurgicalCompleted
-
Yale UniversityCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnProstate Cancer | Bladder Cancer | Kidney Tumor
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedKidney Cancer | Kidney Cancer Metastatic | Kidney Cancer, Stage IVUnited States