Imaging During Surgery in Diagnosing Patients With Prostate, Bladder, or Kidney Cancer

July 25, 2014 updated by: Stanford University

Utility of Fluorescence and Photoacoustic Imaging Intraoperatively to Assist With Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery

This pilot clinical trial studies imaging during surgery in diagnosing patients with prostate, bladder, or kidney cancer. New diagnostic imaging procedures, may find prostate, bladder, or kidney cancer

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. The primary objective of this pilot study is to assess the ability of fluorescent imaging and photoacoustic imaging (PAI) in a clinical setting to distinguish benign from malignant tissue.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To qualitatively determine the possible benefit of PAI and fluorescent imaging over traditional white light imaging.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo fluorescence imaging and PAI during robot assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have a pathologic confirmation of prostate cancer, bladder cancer, or kidney cancer based on previous biopsies or procedures OR a strong concern for a kidney malignancy based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a surgical history or anatomic variant that would preclude robot assisted laparoscopic approaches to their surgery (i.e. history of ventral hernia repair with mesh)
  • Patients with medical co-morbidities who cannot tolerate laparoscopic surgery secondary to intra-abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation
  • Patients with documented allergy or adverse drug reaction to indocyanine green or baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic (fluorescence imaging, PAI)
Patients undergo fluorescence imaging and PAI during robot assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Undergo PAI
Other Names:
  • PAI
  • optoacoustic imaging
Undergo fluorescence imaging
Undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Margin/lesion status determined by histopathology (cancer status [positive vs negative] as well as grade [Gleason grade 1-5 for prostate cancer, high vs low grade for bladder cancer, and Fuhrman grade 1-4 for kidney cancer])
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after surgery
The average lesion signal intensity on PAI and fluorescent imaging will be tested against the histology at pathological examination of the tissue sample.
Up to 6 months after surgery
Photoacoustic signal intensity (signal-to-noise ratio in the region of interest)
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
The average lesion signal intensity on PAI and fluorescent imaging will be tested against the histology at pathological examination of the tissue sample. The distribution of signal intensity on PAI will be graphed as boxplot. The investigators will examine these parameters and compare them between malignant and benign cases using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests without making assumptions of normality.
During the time of surgery
Hemoglobin content (lesion total hemoglobin) as determined by photoacoustic measurements
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
The distribution of signal intensity on hemoglobin content will be graphed as boxplots. The investigators will examine these parameters and compare them between malignant and benign cases using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests without making assumptions of normality.
During the time of surgery
Fluorescence intensity (signal-to-noise ratio in the region of interest)
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
The distribution of signal intensity on fluorescence intensity will be graphed as boxplots. The investigators will examine these parameters and compare them between malignant and benign cases using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests without making assumptions of normality.
During the time of surgery
Oxygen saturation (percent oxygen saturation in region of interest) as determined by photoacoustic measurements
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
The distribution of signal intensity on oxygen saturation will be graphed as boxplots. The investigators will examine these parameters and compare them between malignant and benign cases using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests without making assumptions of normality.
During the time of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective operator determined characteristics for ease of identification of pedicle, NV bundle, and lymph nodes (prostate cancer patients)
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the operator determined secondary endpoints of the utility of each different imaging modality (i.e. white light, PAI, and fluorescence imaging).
During the time of surgery
Subjective operator determined characteristics for ease of identification of pedicle, ureter, and lymph nodes (bladder cancer patients)
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the operator determined secondary endpoints of the utility of each different imaging modality (i.e. white light, PAI, and fluorescence imaging).
During the time of surgery
Subjective operator determined characteristics for ease of identification of hilum and tumor (kidney cancer patients)
Time Frame: During the time of surgery
Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the operator determined secondary endpoints of the utility of each different imaging modality (i.e. white light, PAI, and fluorescence imaging).
During the time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Gonzalgo, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VAR0083
  • NCI-2012-01654 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on photoacoustic imaging

Subscribe