Machine Learning Assisted Recognition of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Emergency Calls.

April 15, 2020 updated by: Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, Denmark

Can a Machine Learning Recognise of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During Emergency Calls and Assist Medical Dispatchers

Emergency medical Services Copenhagen has developed a machine learning model that analyzes the calls to 1-1-2 (9-1-1) in real time. The model are able to recognize calls where a cardiac arrest is suspected. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of a computer generated alert in calls where cardiac arrest is suspected.

The study will investigate

  1. whether a potential increase in recognitions is due to machine alerts or the increased focus of the medical dispatcher on recognizing Out-of-Hospital cardiac Arrest (OHCA) when implementing the machine
  2. if a machine learning model based on neural networks, when alerting medical dispatchers will increase overall recognition of OHCA and increase dispatch of citizen responders.
  3. increased use of automated external defibrillators (AED), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or dispatch of citizen responders in cases of OHCA on machine recognised OHCA vs. medical dispatcher recognised OHCA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chances of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decrease 10% per minute from collapse until CPR is initiated. dispatcher assisted telephone CPR will be initiated only in cases where the dispatcher recognizes the cardiac arrest.

In a previous project "Can a computer through machine learning recognise of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest during emergency calls" (supported by TrygFoundation), the investigators found, it was possible to create a Machine Learning (ML) model, which could recognise OHCA with higher precision than medical dispatchers at the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC-Copenhagen).

In this study the model andt is effect is to be documented in the EMDC-Copenhagen. For this purpose, a computer server running the ML-model are created. This server is integrated in the network at EMDC-Copenhagen, making it possible to push alerts to the medical dispatcher, when a cardiac arrest is recognised by the model.

With aid of machine learning, the hypothesis is, that recognition of OHCA is improved, and happen both more frequent and faster than present.

An instruction for the medical dispatchers is developed, which guides the medical dispatcher in instance of an alert from the machine.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5242

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Danmark
      • Ballerup, Danmark, Denmark, DK-2750
        • Emergency Medical Services Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Call regarding a cardiac arrest registered in the national Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry
  • OHCA is recognized by machine-learning model
  • Call originates from 1-1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OHCA Emergency Medical Services - witnessed
  • Call is from another authority (police or fire brigade)
  • Call is a repeat call
  • Call has been on hold for conference

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Machine alert
These cardiac suspected cardiac arrest will have had an alert generated by the machine learning model in addition to standard Emergency Medical Services response.
Alert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest'
No Intervention: Usual care
These suspected cardiac arrests will receive standard Emergency Medical Services response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest
Time Frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Dispatcher recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is the primary outcome. Recognition is reported by a questionnaire filled in by a group of auditors listening to recordings of all included calls. The questionnaire is a modified CARES protocol for the calls and consists of 21 questions whereby the quality of the call is evaluated. The questionnaire is validated and has been used in other studies.
During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to recognition
Time Frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Time from call-start until dispatcher recognition of cardiac arrest
During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Dispatcher assisted telephone CPR
Time Frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Does the dispatcher ask caller to initiate CPR.
During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Time to T-CPR
Time Frame: During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.
Time from call-start until dispatcher starts guiding caller in cpr
During call to emergency Medical Services, up to 15 minutes from call start.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Freddy Lippert, MD, Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon reasonable request by mail to primary investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Alert on dispatchers screen 'Suspect cardiac arrest'

3
Subscribe