- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02958943
Electronic Alerts for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
Electronic Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support to Increase Prescription of Anticoagulation in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation Patients in the Outpatient Setting (AF-ALERT2)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most preventable cause of stroke. However, despite widely available risk stratification tools, five options for oral anticoagulation, and evidence-based practice guidelines, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF is consistently under-prescribed. Data from this center (Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH]) (1) demonstrate that fewer than 50% of outpatients with AF at high-risk for stroke according to 2012 Focused Update of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of AF (2) receive anticoagulation.
Aim #1: To determine the impact of electronic alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) on prescription of anticoagulation in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
Hypothesis #1: Electronic alert-based CDS will increase prescription of anticoagulation by 80% in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
Aim #2: To determine the impact of electronic alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) on the frequency of stroke and systemic embolic events in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
Hypothesis #2: Electronic alert-based CDS will reduce the frequency of stroke and systemic embolism in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Data acquired through this study regarding the frequency of stroke and systemic embolism will be used to calculate sample size requirements for a future clinical end-point driven randomized controlled trial of electronic alerts to prevent stroke in high-risk AF patients.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
AF is associated with an increased risk of fatal and disabling ischemic stroke. Despite widely accessible evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, risk stratification tools (CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED) and five effective oral antithrombotic agents for stroke prevention (22), at least 40% of high-risk patients with AF worldwide remain unprotected because of failure to prescribe anticoagulation. The failure to prevent stroke in AF has become a critical international patient safety crisis. The root causes of underutilization include lack of provider and patient education about the importance of stroke prevention in AF, inadequate risk stratification, and concerns regarding the bleeding risk with anticoagulant therapy. The investigators were surprised to learn that even at BWH, underutilization of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF continues to be a concern (1).
The failure to prevent stroke in AF is similar to the crisis in VTE prevention among hospitalized patients from a decade ago. To address this critical patient safety problem, investigators evaluated the impact of alert-based CDS on VTE prevention (18). First, investigators designed software linked to our Electronic Health Record (EHR) and provider order entry program to identify hospitalized patients at risk for VTE using a weighted risk score and for whom prophylaxis was not ordered. Patients were randomized to the intervention group, in which the responsible physician received an electronic alert regarding the risk of VTE and recommendation regarding prophylaxis, or to the control group, in which no alert was issued. Compared with the control group, electronic alerts more than doubled the rate of thromboprophylaxis orders (from 14.5% to 33.5%; p<0.0001). The risk of symptomatic VTE was reduced by 41% (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.81; p=0.001) among patients for whom an electronic alert was issued. Investigators have also shown that "human" (person-to-person) alert-based decision support for the prevention of VTE in at-risk hospitalized patients more than doubled the rate of VTE prophylaxis compared with controls during hospitalization (21) and after discharge (19).
The current study will determine the impact of electronic alert-based CDS on prescription of anticoagulation in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Because this is a Quality Improvement initiative, investigators will not mandate a specific antithrombotic agent, regimen, or duration. Investigators will provide options for anticoagulation to prevent stroke in AF and allow the provider to make the best choice based on their clinical judgment. If there is a contraindication to anticoagulation or if the risks outweigh the benefits of antithrombotic therapy, the provider can elect to omit anticoagulation but will need to provide the rationale for doing so. The current study will also determine the impact of electronic alert-based CDS on the frequency of stroke and systemic embolic events in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Data acquired through this study regarding the frequency of stroke and systemic embolism will be used to calculate sample size requirements for a future clinical end-point driven randomized controlled trial of electronic alerts to prevent stroke in high-risk AF patients.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Problem list entry of AF or atrial flutter
- CHA2DS2VASc score ≥2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active prescription for anticoagulant therapy
- CHA2DS2VASc score <2
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Electronic Alert
Each provider in the alert group will receive an on-screen notification regarding the patient's increased risk of stroke in AF and the lack of an active order for anticoagulation.
|
On-screen notification regarding the patient's increased risk of stroke in AF and the lack of an active order for anticoagulation.
Providers may then 1) access a template of FDA-approved anticoagulation regimens for stroke prevention in AF, 2) follow a link to evidence based clinical practice guidelines, or 3) proceed onto order entry after providing an explanation for why anticoagulation was not prescribed.
|
No Intervention: No Alert
Each provider in the non-alert group will receive no such notification.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
frequency of prescription of anticoagulation in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
frequency of prescription of anticoagulation in high-risk AF patients in the outpatient setting who are not being prescribed anticoagulation for stroke prevention before study randomization.
The primary efficacy outcome will be determined by review of the EHR medication documentation for prescription of anticoagulation by 48 hours after randomization.
|
48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
frequency of stroke/TIA, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
|
frequency of stroke/TIA, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality at 3 months from randomization
|
3 months
|
frequency of major bleeding (as defined by the ISTH bleeding classification system)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
major bleeding (as defined by the ISTH bleeding classification system) at 3 months from randomization
|
3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
frequency of stroke, TIA, systemic embolism
Time Frame: 3 months
|
frequency of stroke, TIA, systemic embolism
|
3 months
|
frequency of myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 3 months
|
frequency of myocardial infarction
|
3 months
|
frequency of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 months
|
frequency of all-cause mortality
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016D005336
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
Turkish Stroke Research and Clinical Trials NetworkElectroCore INC; Turkish Neurological SocietyCompletedStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke, HemorrhagicTurkey
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
Clinical Trials on On-screen electronic alert
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2United States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalBayerActive, not recruitingChronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary HypertensionUnited States
-
Emergency Medical Services, Capital Region, DenmarkCompletedOut-Of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestDenmark
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalUnknownAcute Kidney Injury
-
Yale UniversityCompletedRisk EValuation And Its Impact on ClinicAL Decision Making and Outcomes in Heart Failure (REVeAL-HF)Heart FailureUnited States
-
Yale UniversityCompletedHigh Risk Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Columbia UniversitySeattle Children's Hospital; New York Presbyterian Hospital; Agency for Healthcare...Completed
-
University of California, DavisCompleted