Visual and Electromyography Assessments in Response to Train-of-Four Stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve

October 18, 2022 updated by: J. Ross Renew, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Comparison of Visual and Electromyography Assessments in Response to Train-of-Four Stimulation of the Ulnar Nerve

Researchers are comparing the accuracy of measuring muscle relaxation during and after surgery with a device that provides numeric value versus visual observation to count of muscle twitches or absence of them by a medical provider monitoring your anesthesia during surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years old
  • Patients willing to participate and provide an informed consent
  • Patients undergoing an elective surgical procedure that requires use of NMBA agents administered intraoperatively.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with disorders, such as stroke, carpal tunnel syndrome, broken wrist with nerve damage, Dupuytren contracture, or any similar wrist injury.
  • Patients with systemic neuromuscular diseases such as myasthenia gravis
  • Patients with significant organ dysfunction that can significantly affect pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking and reversal agents, i.e., severe renal impairment or end-stage liver disease.
  • Patients having surgery that would involve prepping the arm or leg into the sterile field

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dominant hand
Subject scheduled to undergo an elective surgical procedure will have TetraGraph device lead placement on the dominant hand and routine clinical monitor on non-dominant hand
FDA approved neuromuscular transmission monitor capable of measuring the depth of neuromuscular block in anesthetized patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents. TetraGraph uses EMG to measure the muscle action potentials that are generated in response to electrical neurostimulation via skin electrodes.
Experimental: Non-dominant hand
Subject scheduled to undergo an elective surgical procedure will have TetraGraph device lead placement on the non-dominant hand and routine clinical monitor on dominant hand
FDA approved neuromuscular transmission monitor capable of measuring the depth of neuromuscular block in anesthetized patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents. TetraGraph uses EMG to measure the muscle action potentials that are generated in response to electrical neurostimulation via skin electrodes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Evaluation to Neurostimulation
Time Frame: up to 1 hour postoperatively
The percentage of subjective evaluations that overestimated the response of the adductor pollicis muscle following neurostimulation of the ulnar nerve when compared to objective measurements.
up to 1 hour postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour postoperatively
Number of subjects with train of four ratio < 0.9 after administration of reversal agent.
Up to 1 hour postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20-000619

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Residual Neuromuscular Blockade

Clinical Trials on TetraGraph

3
Subscribe