Artificial Intelligence With DEep Learning on COROnary Microvascular Disease (AIDECORO)

May 18, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble
Despite the progress made in the management of myocardial infarction (MI), the associated morbidity and mortality remains high. Numerous scientific data show that damage of the coronary microcirculation (CM) during a STEMI remains a problem because the techniques for measuring it are still imperfect. We have simple methods for estimating the damage to the MC during the initial coronary angiography, the best known being the calculation of the myocardial blush grade (MBG), but which is semi-quantitative and therefore not very precise, or more precise imaging techniques, such as cardiac MRI, which are performed 48 hours after the infarction and which make the development of early applicable therapeutics not very propitious. Finally, lately, the use of special coronary guides to measure a precise CM index remains non-optimal because it prolongs the procedure. However, the information is in the picture and this information could allow the development of therapeutic strategies adapted to the patient's CM. Indeed, the arrival of iodine in CM increases the density of the pixels of the image, this has been demonstrated by the implementation in 2009 of a software allowing the calculation of the MBG assisted by computer. But the performances of this software did not allow its wide diffusion. Today, the field of medical image analysis presents dazzling progress thanks to artificial intelligence (AI). Deep Learning, a sub-category of Machine Learning, is probably the most powerful form of AI for automated image analysis today. Made up of a network of artificial neurons, it allows, using a very large number of known examples, to extract the most relevant characteristics of the image to solve a given problem. Thus, it uses thousands of pieces of information, sometimes imperceptible to the naked eye. We hypothesize that a supervised Deep Learning algorithm trained with a set of relevant data, will be able to identify a patient with a pejorative prognosis, probably related to a microcirculatory impairment visible in the image.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to develop an algorithm capable of identifying patients with poor prognosis criteria at the time of hospitalization for STEMI, despite successful revascularization by analyzing coronary angiography images using supervised Deep Learning type artificial intelligence methods.

The protocol will be subdivided into 4 steps:

- Step 1: Patient selection

Data mining to identify and select patients via PMSI data. Patients will be contacted by telephone follow-up to check the participation agreement and collect the primary outcome. Other data from the patient's medical file will be collected through PREDIMED.

- Step 2: Data annotation

To identify for each patient with successful revascularization according to the usual criteria (TIMI Flow = 3, MBG = 2 or 3 and ST segment resolution > 70%) whether or not he or she presents, at the time of hospitalization for STEMI, pejorative evolution criteria defined by the occurrence of death or rehospitalization for heart Failure at the time of follow-up . This step requires the expertise of an angioplastician and will result in the generation of a database of 600 cases. To train the algorithm to recognize images in the context of STEMI revascularization, 1000 normal coronary angiographies performed in a stable disease context will also be identified.

- Step 3: Development of a new method for analyzing coronary angiography images to identify patients with non-optimal revascularization.

Develop using Tensorflow/Keras libraries a supervised Deep Learning AI algorithm trained to identify patients with non-optimal revascularization (patient with poor prognosis). The algorithm will be based on convolutional neural network methodology and the model will be trained using data from the two previous steps. All or part of the sequence of interest will be used at the input of the model which will propose at the output a probability of good or bad prognosis of the patient.The 1000 complementary coronary angiographies will be used to artificially increase the learning base by increasing the number of cases or will be exploited for a transfer learning method.

- Step 4: Evaluation of the pathophysiological hypothesis.

The main weakness of AI is the "Black Box". That is, the algorithm can predict correctly without knowing how. It is then difficult to link the result to a physiopathological phenomenon and to develop therapeutics. Here we will evaluate the correlation of the algorithm's result with the reference method for measuring CD used in the patients of the Guardiancory study (NCT03087175).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Grenoble Alpes
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing coronary angioplasty revascularization at CHUGA for STEMI from 2015 to 2018.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years
  • Patients who have undergone coronary angioplasty revascularization at CHUGA for STEMI from 2015 to 2018 for which images are usable.
  • Patient affiliated with social security
  • Non-opposition to participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coronary artery image not usable
  • Patient under guardianship or deprived of liberty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
600 patients involved in the prospective study
These patients will be contacted by telephone follow-up, offered participation in the study and sent the information and non-opposition letter. In case of refusal, data will not be used.
1000 patients involved in a non-human study
To train the algorithm to recognize images in the context of STEMI revascularization, 1000 normal coronary angiograms performed in a stable disease context will also be identified.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death or re-hospitalization for heart Failure
Time Frame: Baseline (at the time of the phone call) - From nov 2020 and jan 2021 [anticipated]
The predictive accuracy will be evaluated by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value on the test cohort.
Baseline (at the time of the phone call) - From nov 2020 and jan 2021 [anticipated]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Algorithm study
Time Frame: After data annotation (step 2) and developping the algorithm (step 3) - In Jan 2022 [anticipated]
Study of the correlations of the result of the algorithm with the reference method for measuring coronary microcirculation.
After data annotation (step 2) and developping the algorithm (step 3) - In Jan 2022 [anticipated]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gilles Barone-Rochette, University Hospital, Grenoble

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38RC20.307
  • 2020-A02379-30 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

3
Subscribe