Predictive Value of New AMH Test Method for Ovarian Response

Predictive Value of New AMH Test Method for Ovarian Response in Patients With IVF/ICSI

In China, the incidence of infertility is about 15%, and patients need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART) to obtain pregnancy. It is particularly important to accurately predict the patient's ovarian response before initiating controlled ovulation hyperstimulation (COH). At present, the commonly used AMH detection method is enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), and it has obtained the normal reference range for ovarian response. In recent years, with the development of detection technology, chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) detection reagents have been successively used for the detection of AMH. However, there are few studies on the comparison of these two detection methods. The predictive value of the new method on ovarian response was lack. Therefore, by comparing the two methods of ELISA and CLIA detection of AMH levels in this study, the predictive value of poor ovarian response (the number of retrieved oocyte ≤ 3) and high response (the number of retrieved oocyte ≥ 15) in IVF/ICSI stimulation cycle was analyzed. In order to provide more reference basis for individualized COH, the AMH cutoff value of low and high ovarian response by the new method predicts was analyzed. At the same time, the prediction value of the two methods is compared to determine whether the new CLIA is suitable for clinical application.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

454

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Reproductive & Genetic hospital Of CITIC-Xiangya

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

infertility females

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The first IVF/ICSI COH cycle;
  • the causes of infertility :fallopian tube factors and/or male factors;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Endometriosis;
  • PCOS;
  • Adenomyosis;
  • PGT cycle because of the female chromosome abnormality or genetic abnormality;
  • FET cycle;
  • Malignant tumor patient.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ELISA
ELISA kit detecting the serum AMH level
ELISA kit detecting the serum AMH level
Other Names:
  • experimental group
Chemiluminescence
CLIA method detecting the serum AMH level
CLIA method detecting the serum AMH level
Other Names:
  • control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the AMH(CLIA) cutoff value of low and high ovarian response
Time Frame: the day of oocytes retrieved,about three months after AMH test
the poor ovarian response :the number of retrieved oocyte ≤ 3,the high ovarian response :the number of retrieved oocyte ≥ 15
the day of oocytes retrieved,about three months after AMH test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of oocytes retrieved
Time Frame: 34-36 hours after hCG trigger,about three months after AMH test
the number of oocytes retrieved after hCG trigger
34-36 hours after hCG trigger,about three months after AMH test
the serum AMH level
Time Frame: any day of the menstrual cycle, about three months after study starting
anti-muller hormone
any day of the menstrual cycle, about three months after study starting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Fei Gong, PhD, Reproductive & Genetic hospital Of CITIC-Xiangya

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P2020004

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe