Study of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Tiragolumab in Participants With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SKYSCRAPER-02C)

January 30, 2026 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Atezolizumab Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide With or Without Tiragolumab in Patients With Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this multicenter study in China is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and carboplatin and etoposide (CE) compared with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE in participants with untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100142
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 101149
        • Beijing Chest Hospital
      • Bengbu, China, 233000
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College
      • Changchun, China, 130021
        • The First hospital of Jilin University
      • Fuzhou, China, 350014
        • Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
      • Guangzhou, China, 510000
        • Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University
      • Hangzhou, China, 310016
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
      • Hangzhou, China, 310022
        • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
      • Harbin, China, 150081
        • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
      • Nanchang, China, 330006
        • The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Unversity
      • Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Shanghai Chest Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
      • Shanghai, China, 200120
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
      • Shantou, China, 515041
        • Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
      • Wuhan, China, 430022
        • Wuhan Union Hospital Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
      • Zhengzhou, China, 450008
        • Henan Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) per the modified Veterans Administration Lung Study Group (VALG) staging system
  • No prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC
  • For participants who have received prior chemoradiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC must have had treatment with curative intent and a treatment-free interval of at least 6 months between the last dose/cycle of chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy and the diagnosis of ES-SCLC
  • Measurable diseases as defined by RECIST v1.1
  • Submission of a pre-treatment tumor tissue sample
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
  • Participants not receiving therapeutic anticoagulation with International Normalized Ratio (INR) and Activated Clotting Time (aPTT) </= 1.5 x ULN
  • Participants receiving therapeutic anticoagulation: stable anticoagulant regimen
  • Negative Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) test at screening
  • Negative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) test at screening
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) test at screening, or negative HBsAb at screening accompanied by either of the following: negative total hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) and/or positive total HBcAb test followed by a negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA test
  • Negative hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody test at screening, or positive HCV antibody test followed by a negative HCV RNA test
  • Negative Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM test or negative EBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test at screening
  • For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraception, and agreement to refrain from donating eggs
  • For men: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraceptive methods, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic or actively progressing central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • Spinal cord compression
  • Leptomeningeal disease
  • Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites
  • Uncontrolled or symptomatic hypercalcemia
  • Known clinically significant liver disease, including active viral, alcoholic, or other hepatitis, cirrhosis, and inherited liver disease, or current alcohol abuse
  • Malignancies other than SCLC within 5 years prior to randomization
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiencies
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest Computer Tomography (CT) scan
  • Known active tuberculosis, Current treatment with anti-viral therapy for HBV or HCV
  • Severe chronic or active infection
  • Treatment with therapeutic oral or IV antibiotics
  • Significant cardiovascular disease
  • Major surgical procedure other than for diagnosis
  • Prior allogeneic bone marrow transplantation or solid organ transplant
  • Any other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition
  • Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine
  • Prior treatment with CD137 agonists, T-cell co-stimulating, or immune checkpoint blockade therapies
  • Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents
  • Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medications
  • History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
  • Known hypersensitivity to Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell products or to any component of the tiragolumab or atezolizumab formulations
  • History of allergic reactions to carboplatin or etoposide
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during study treatment or within 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab or within 90 days after the final dose of tiragolumab or for 6 months after the final dose of carboplatin or etoposide.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin and Etoposide
Induction treatment with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and CE will be administered on a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab for 21-day cycles.
Tiragolumab at a fixed dose of 600 milligrams (mg), administered by intravenous (IV) infusion, every 3 weeks (Q3W) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
  • MTIG7192A
Atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1200 mg, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
  • Tecentriq
Carboplatin administered IV to achieve an initial target area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL/min, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Etoposide 100 mg/m^2, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin and Etoposide
Induction treatment with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE will be administered on a 21-day cycle for 4 cycles. Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with placebo plus atezolizumab for 21-day cycles
Atezolizumab at a fixed dose of 1200 mg, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other Names:
  • Tecentriq
Carboplatin administered IV to achieve an initial target area under the concentration time curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL/min, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Etoposide 100 mg/m^2, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
Matching placebo, administered by IV infusion, Q3W on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Investigator-Assessed Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Primary Analysis Set (PAS)
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression (PD), as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm).
Up to 32.3 months
Overall Survival (OS) in the PAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Up to 32.3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Tiragolumab
Time Frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycles (each cycle=21 days) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 and at TD visit (up to approximately 49 months)
Predose on Day 1 of Cycles (each cycle=21 days) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 and at TD visit (up to approximately 49 months)
PFS in the FAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Up to 32.3 months
OS in the FAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Up to 32.3 months
Investigator-Assessed Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Up to 32.3 months
Investigator-Assessed Confirmed ORR in the FAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off.
Up to 32.3 months
Investigator-Assessed Duration of Response (DOR) in the PAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
DOR was defined as the time interval from the date of the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response until the first date of PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had an objective response of CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Up to 32.3 months
Investigator-Assessed DOR in the FAS
Time Frame: Up to 32.3 months
DOR was defined as the time interval from the date of the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response until the first date of PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had an objective response of CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Up to 32.3 months
Investigator-Assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the PAS
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
PFS = time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, per investigator per RECIST v1.1/ death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS rate at 6 and 12 = the percentage of participants who have not experienced PD per investigator per RECIST v1.1/ death from any cause at 6 and 12 months. PD =at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off. Abbreviation used in Statistical Analysis section - Event Free Rate - EFR. The event free rate (for example the inv-PFS free rate of 10.24% at 12-months) used the K-M approach to estimate, which accounts for the censoring, the specific nature of time-to-event data. Naive calculation based on patient proportion will introduce bias.
Month 6, Month 12
Investigator-Assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the FAS
Time Frame: Month 6, Month 12
PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months defined as the percentage of participants who have not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 and 12 months. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. K-M method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off. The event free rate used the K-M approach to estimate, which accounts for the censoring, the specific nature of time-to-event data. Naive calculation based on patient proportion will introduce bias.
Month 6, Month 12
Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months and 24 Months in the PAS
Time Frame: Month 12, Month 24
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months. Percentages have been rounded off.
Month 12, Month 24
Overall Survival Rates at 12 Months and 24 Months in the FAS
Time Frame: Month 12, Month 24
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months. Percentages have been rounded off.
Month 12, Month 24
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 66 months
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product, any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease (a worsening in the character, frequency, or severity of a known condition), recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at baseline, any deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test that is associated with symptoms or leads to a change in study treatment or concomitant treatment or discontinuation from study drug or adverse events that are related to a protocol-mandated intervention, including those that occur prior to assignment of study treatment.
Up to 66 months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core (QLQ-C30) Score in the PAS
Time Frame: Up to approximately 66 months
Up to approximately 66 months
TTCD Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 Score in the FAS
Time Frame: Up to approximately 66 months
Up to approximately 66 months
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tiragolumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post end of infusion (EOI) (cycle length= 21 days)
Only sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in this study. With the focus on only Cmax and Cmin, there are no additional PK timepoints not reported
Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post end of infusion (EOI) (cycle length= 21 days)
Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Tiragolumab
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days)
Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days)
Cmax of Atezolizumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post EOI (cycle length= 21 days)
Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post EOI (cycle length= 21 days)
Cmin of Atezolizumab
Time Frame: Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days)
Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Clinical Trials, Hoffmann-La Roche

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe