Comparison of ISTp- PYRAMAX-US-RDT to IPTp-SP to Prevent Malaria in Pregnant Women in DRC (ULTRAPYRAPREG) (ULTRAPYRAPREG)

November 3, 2022 updated by: Vivi Maketa, University of Kinshasa

Comparison of IST Using Ultra-sensitive Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test and Pyronaridine - Artesunate - PYRAMAX®) to Standard IPT Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to Prevent Malaria in Pregnant Women Living in Endemic Areas

In endemic settings Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) can sequester in the placenta resulting in low peripheral parasitemia and false negative malaria diagnosis in pregnant women. Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnant women with Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) is one of the World Health Organization's recommended malaria control strategies in sub-Saharan African countries. The strategy overcomes the risk of misdiagnosis of malaria in pregnant women by treating them all with SP according to predetermined schedules, but the strategy is now threatened by the spread of Plasmodium parasite resistant strains. As a necessary alternative, Intermittent Screening and Treatment in pregnancy (ISTp), aims on the monthly screening of pregnant women with a malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and the treatment of positive cases with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) regardless of the presence of symptoms. The ISTp depends on the performance of the diagnostic tests, and the use of ultrasensitive RDTs (us-RDTs), which have a higher analytical sensitivity than conventional RDTs, should improve the efficacy of the strategy.

Unlike IPTp-SP, ISTp prevents overuse of antimalarials and thus limits drug pressure on malaria parasites. This advantage could be potentiated by using, for pregnant women, an ACT that is not yet used or should not be used in the field for other strata of the population. The recently approved new ACT combination, Pyronaridine - Artesunate (Pyramax®) is the ideal candidate for this purpose.

This study will compare the effects of the ISTp using an us-RDT and Pyramax® (ISTp-US-Py) with the standard IPTp-SP on maternal malaria indicators (malaria infection, parasite density), maternal anemia, spontaneous abortions or intrauterine deaths during pregnancy, fetal morbidity (preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age) and neonatal mortality at delivery in both study groups through conducting a randomized clinical trial enrolling second trimester pregnant women in Maternité Esengo Health Center, located in Kisenso, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), a malaria perennial transmission area.

The results generated from this study will be essential for the National Malaria Control Program in the selection and implementation of new malaria control policies and addresses the effectiveness of IPTp-SP decline among pregnant women in the DRC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

1. Introduction Malaria is a threat for pregnant women and their offspring in endemic settings (1, 2). Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) can sequester in the placenta during pregnancy, resulting in low peripheral parasitemia. As a consequence, malaria diagnostic tests are often false negative in pregnant women who actually do have a Pf malaria infection (3, 4).

Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnant women with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) is one of the World Health Organization (WHO)'s recommended malaria control strategies in sub-Saharan African countries (2). The IPTp-SP strategy surmounts the potential misdiagnosis of malaria in pregnant women by treating them all with SP at pre-determined schedules during the antenatal care (ANC) visits. The efficacy of IPTp-SP is dose dependent and relies on ANC coverage. However, the spread of Plasmodium SP resistant strains now threatens the efficacy of the IPTp-SP and can lead to the proliferation of placental resistant parasites in pregnant women (5-9).

As an alternative for IPTp-SP, Intermittent Screening and Treatment in pregnancy (ISTp) may be considered as an option (10). ISTp comprises of monthly screening of pregnant women with a malaria RDT and treatment of positive cases with an artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) regardless of the presence of symptoms. The ISTp depends on the performance of the diagnostic tests and the use of ultrasensitive RDTs (us-RDTs), which have a higher sensitivity than conventional RDTs (11, 12), can avoid false negative that would prevent the method from being effective.

Unlike IPTp-SP, ISTp prevents overuse of antimalarials and, thus, limits drug pressure on malaria parasites (10). This advantage could be potentiated by using an ACT that is not yet used or should not be used by the national malaria control for other strata of the population than pregnant women. Pyronaridine - Artesunate (Pyramax®), a newly approved antimalarial is the ideal candidate for this purpose in Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Pyramax®, approved for use in malaria endemic countries since 2015, is used in the field to treat malaria in children and adults (13). There is little information on the safety of Pyramax® during pregnancy, however, Pyronaridine unintentionally administered successfully treated at least 40 cases of malaria in late pregnancy (14) and, a review reported that ACTs, although Pyramax® was not included in, are generally very effective and well tolerated during the second and third trimesters (15).

The hypothesis of this study is that the ISTp using Pyramax® for the treatment and performed with the us-RDT (ISTp-US-Py) is non inferior than IPTp-SP for the prevention of maternal malaria (malaria infection, parasite density), maternal anemia, spontaneous abortions or intrauterine death during pregnancy, fetal morbidity (premature birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age) and neonatal mortality at childbirth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Gestation ≥16 weeks;
  2. Age: ≥18 years;
  3. Residence within the health facility catchment area;
  4. Willing to adhere to study requirements and to deliver at the health facility.
  5. Willing to provide written informed consent; if the woman is illiterate, she can choose an impartial witness, not related to the study, to accompany her during the informant consent process and they will both sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known history of allergy to SP or to an ACT
  2. An ongoing antibioprophylaxis with cotrimoxazole,
  3. Current issue requiring hospital admission (including severe malaria as defined by WHO)
  4. Pregnancy at high risk

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: IPTp-SP
The IPTp-SP group will be pregnant women who will receive the standard regimen recommended by the Malaria National Control Program (MNCP) at week 16, 28, 32 and 36 of their pregnancy
Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnant women with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine
Other Names:
  • IPTp-SP
Experimental: ISTp-US-Py
The ISTp-US-Py group will comprise pregnant women who will be screened monthly from the beginning of the 2nd trimester with ultra-sensitive -RDT and who will be treated with Pyramax® if the test is positive
Intermittent screening using ultra-sensitive malaria Rapid Diagnostic test and treatment using Pyronaridine - Artesunate (PYRAMAX®)
Other Names:
  • ISTp-US-Py

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of asymptomatic malaria in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Asymptomatic malaria is defined as the presence of Pf diagnosed by an us-RDT in the peripheral blood and a T°≤38°C
6 months
The proportion symptomatic malaria in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Symptomatic malaria is be defined as the presence of Pf diagnosed by an us-RDT in the peripheral blood and a T°≥38°C
6 months
The proportion of parasitic densities in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Parasite density is assessed by the quantification of Pf parasites in the peripheral blood of asymptomatic/symptomatic women by a thin blood smear examined by standard malaria microscopy
6 months
The proportion of anemia in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Anemia is defined as a level of hemoglobin (Hb) <10g/dl
6 months
The incidence of spontaneous abortions or intrauterine deaths in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Intrauterine death is defined to describe the death of the offspring in the uterus
6 months
The proportion of fetal morbidities in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 6 months
Fetal morbidity is defined as any of the following: Preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks gestation) and low-birth-weight (birth weight under 2,500 grams)
6 months
The proportion of the neonatal and early neonatal mortality of the offspring in the 2 study arms
Time Frame: 28 days
The early neonatal mortality is defined as infant death at birth or within 7 days of life; And the neonatal mortality is defined as infant death within the first 28 days of life
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Document to be share: all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Starting right after the publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with any researcher who will ask via any contact of the corresponding author of any publication resulting from this clinical trial

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe