Impact of Rapid Screening for COVID-19 in Delocalized Biology in the Emergency Department (DELOCOVID)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, first appeared in China, and then spread around the world. In December 2019, a group of patients with pneumonia of unknown origin were infected after exposure to the market in Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Very quickly, a new coronavirus was isolated from a sample of a patient's lower respiratory tract and the entire virus genome was sequenced. This new coronavirus, named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for its genetic homology with SARS-CoV-2, has shown worldwide expansion. Thus, on January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the COVID-19 epidemic as a threat to public health at the international level, then, in March 2020, the global situation degenerated into a pandemic. . Johns Hopkins University has reported more than 7,600,000 cases of infections and more than 427,000 deaths as of June 13, 2020. Due to the rapid progression of the COVID-19 pandemic and the limited capacity of molecular laboratory tests, the concept of delocalized molecular tests appears to be relevant. Indeed, the urgent need to increase testing for COVID-19 has been clearly identified as an essential part of the strategy to combat the coronavirus worldwide. In fact, COVID-19 represents a major public health problem currently causing a rapidly increasing number of infections and significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. As of July 1, 2020, more than 10 million people worldwide have been infected with SARS-CoV-2. As of December 20, 2020, this tally is 76,624,363 cases of contamination and 1,690,658 deaths following Johns Hopkins University

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Early detection with a sensitive technique of COVID-19 is essential to ensure rapid and appropriate patient management, to contain the epidemic and to better understand the global epidemiology of the virus. This detection will intensify in the coming months due to the start of the school year and university as well as the economic recovery. Until now, laboratory diagnostics have relied primarily on the amplification and detection of viral gene sequences in upper respiratory tract samples performed in a centralized laboratory. A new test (Abbott ID NowTM COVID-19) is available on the market. This test is the first in France to be able to be carried out in a delocalized medical biology examination (DMBE) and makes it possible to return a result in less than 15 min directly in the clinical department. The speed of this technique is based on the use of isothermal gene amplification. The investigators will be the first to evaluate it in France in delocalized biology.

The improvement in diagnostic technique, concomitant with the development of knowledge on the pathophysiology and specific therapies, has been accompanied by better therapeutic management of patients with Covid19. To date, dexamethasone represents the first class of drugs proven to be effective in reducing mortality from COVID-19 in patients with severe disease. Anticoagulant treatment at a prophylactic dose in hospitalized patients or at risk for the severe form, and at a curative dose for severe forms is also the subject of strong recommendations due to the high incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in these patients. It is also recommended that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics be reserved for patients with radiological abnormalities compatible with bacterial superinfection and / or requiring oxygen therapy greater than or equal to 6 liters / min.

In France, systematic screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the emergency room before hospitalization, an operating room, or transfer to another establishment. At GhPSJ, the reference RT-PCR technique Simplexa ™ COVID-19 Direct assay has been used routinely since July 2020 by the microbiology laboratory. It allows a result rendering in a minimum delay of 50 minutes. Since September 7, 2020, the prescription of an RT-PCR is systematically associated with a dedicated computerized questionnaire on the DxCare® software completed by the emergency physician. It collects the reason for prescribing RT-PCR: "diagnostic suspicion", "bed management", "preoperative screening", or "screening for transfer to another establishment"; the patient's lifestyle; the symptomatic or asymptomatic nature and the duration of the symptoms. Since October 22, 2020, the DMBE with the Test ID NowTM COVID-19 has been installed and implemented in the Emergency Department. It is used by the trained and authorized Emergency Nursing team for any patient having a prescription for RT-PCR Sars-CoV-2 by the emergency physician.

The investigators wish to verify the hypothesis that obtaining the rapid diagnosis of Sars-CoV-2 infection by DMBE in the emergency room (Test ID NowTM COVID-19) makes it possible to optimize the organizational and medical management of emergency room patients having a Sars-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. In the literature, there is no study available evaluating the impact of a rapid examination in delocalized biology on the medical management of patients in an emergency department.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2488

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ile De France
      • Paris, Ile De France, France, 75014
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting to the emergency unit of the GhPSJ and for whom a PCR examination is prescribed by the emergency doctor in charge of the patient during the two periods of 7 weeks:

  • Period 1 (weeks 37 to 43 of the year 2020): RT PCR SARS-CoV-2 was carried out in the microbiology laboratory
  • Period 2 (44 to 50 of the year 2020): diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the ID Now ™ technique in emergencies in DMBE with respect for the standards and recommendations of delocalized biology.

The number of patients included will be 1200 per period.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged ≥ 18 years
  • Patient presenting to the emergency unit of the GhPSJ and for whom a PCR examination is prescribed by the emergency doctor in charge of the patient
  • French-speaking patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Patient objecting to the use of their data for this research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the impact of a short delay in delivering results in delocalized biology on the emergency medical care time, in comparison with the reference method by RT-PCR at the central laboratory of microbiology
Time Frame: Day 1
Time of medical care in the emergency department corresponding to the time between the first medical contact (time stamp of the medical observation traced in DxCare®) and the patient's discharge from the Emergency Department (time stamp of the stay in DxCare®)
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the impact of the rapid result in DMBE in comparison with the reference method on the final orientation of the patient
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of returns home and the number of hospitalizations in conventional services and intensive care.
Day 1
Evaluate the impact of the rapid result in DMBE in comparison with the reference method on the bed management
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of admissions in single and double rooms
Day 1
Evaluate the impact of the rapid result in DMBE in comparison with the reference method on the number of additional examinations carried out and their deadline
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of blood tests, ECG, chest X-ray, chest CT scan without injection, pulmonary CT angiography
Day 1
Evaluate the impact of the rapid result in DMBE in comparison with the reference method on the prescriptions and the timeframe for the implementation of specific therapies against Covid-19 in hospitalized patients
Time Frame: Day 1
Introduction of corticosteroid therapy and anticoagulation
Day 1
Evaluate the impact of the rapid result in DMBE in comparison with the reference method on the prescription of antibiotic treatments
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of antibiotic treatments
Day 1
Compare the primary endpoint for two subgroups of patients according to their treatment schedule
Time Frame: Day 1
Number of patients who had a PCR prescription by the day medical team between 8:31 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. and those who had a PCR prescription by the on-call medical team between 6:31 p.m. and 8:30 a.m.
Day 1
Evaluate the level of satisfaction and the feelings of the medical and paramedical teams of the Emergency Department regarding the DMBE Test ID Now ™ COVID-19 and its impact
Time Frame: Day 1
Staff questionnaire (satisfied or not satisfied)
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Claude NGUYEN, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

3
Subscribe