Electroceutical Dressing Technology (EDT) Against Wound Microbial Biofilm Infection (EDT BioFilm)

September 29, 2023 updated by: Dr. Sashwati Roy, Indiana University

Electroceutical Dressing Technology Against Wound Microbial Biofilm Infection

There are currently limited treatments available that show anti-biofilm efficacy for wound infection management Biofilms account for over 80% of infections and approximately 65% of nosocomial infections caused by microorganisms in the developed world involve biofilms. There clearly is a need for cost effective, highly stable, easily obtained biofilm targeted strategies for treatment of chronic wound biofilm infections.

The information generated from this project has the potential of providing considerable benefits to wound care by determining the efficacy of EDT dressing in managing wound biofilm infection and efficacy in wound healing and closure. Such knowledge could help therapeutic strategies and could provide information for future clinical studies to further understanding -of EDT wound dressings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized open-label clinical study to test the efficacy of the treatment protocol using an optimized EDThi & EDTlo sequential approach in infected or high risk of infection burn/trauma/surgery chronic wounds against biofilm infection. This trial will determine the efficacy of EDT dressing against wound biofilm infection. subjects will be randomized to one of the two groups: 1) standard of care (SoC) only and 2) SoC + EDT dressing treatment. In group 2, in addition to SoC, the patients will apply the EDThi dressing (PED-10) on the wound(s) for the first 3 weeks following enrollment followed by Procellera® for additional 3 weeks. The use of dressings will be discontinued anytime if complete wound closure is achieved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

112

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Bryce B Hockman, CCRP
  • Phone Number: 3172782715
  • Email: bbhockma@iu.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Kaitlyn Depinet, FNP-C
  • Phone Number: 3172782747
  • Email: kdepinet@iu.edu

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Eskenazi Health
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46228
        • Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ages 18 years and older
  2. subjects willing and able to provide informed consent
  3. patients with infected chronic trauma or surgical wounds
  4. wound(s) must be able to be covered by the EDT dressing
  5. All patients, with wounds below the knee, must have wound tissue oxygenation adequate to support wound healing per provider discretion, this may be defined by one or more of the following perfusion values within 6 months on enrollment: peri-wound transcutaneous oxygen measurements ≥ 25 mmHg (TCOM),Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) >0.7, or a Toe pressure (TP) > 40 mmHg, If none of these tests were performed during standard of care, then a trained study team member may obtain a TCOM measurement after the patient has consented and before they are enrolled. If there are multiple perfusion values that conflict, then a physician will review and determine if they are eligible for enrollment. If a patient has had a recent re-vascularization, the patient may be enrolled once adequate perfusion has been verified.
  6. Subjects must be able to read and understand English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals who are deemed unable to understand the procedures, risks and benefits of the study, ie. Informed consent will be excluded
  2. Pregnant women
  3. Prisoners
  4. Wound tissue not available for analysis
  5. Patient with known sensitivity or allergic reaction to zinc or silver
  6. Current active diagnosis of Osteomyelitis at the target wound site, that is untreated, based on clinical diagnosis per EMR.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care Only
This will be group 1
Experimental: SOC and PED-10 +Procellera
In group 2, in addition to SoC, the patients will apply the EDThi dressing (PED-10) on the wound(s) for the first 3 weeks following enrollment followed by Procellera® or EDTlo for additional 3 weeks. The use of dressings will be discontinued anytime if complete wound closure is achieved.
Use of EDThi for 3 weeks post enrollment
Other Names:
  • Standard Of Care
Use of EDTlo (Procellera®) for additional 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response to the use of EDT treatment in prevention of wound biofilm infection
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Impact of EDT treatment in prevention of incidence of wound biofilm infection
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of wound closure 6 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline
Time Frame: 6 weeks
rate of wound closure 6 weeks post-treatment as compared to baseline
6 weeks
wound microbiome in SoC and SoC+ EDT treatment.
Time Frame: 3 weeks
presence of microbiome in standard of care with and w/o treatment
3 weeks
Percent of patients with response to EDT treatment on week 6 as compared to SoC only group
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Percent of patients showing treatment response on week 6 comparing SOC group to ntervention group
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sashwati Roy, PhD, Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012285504

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Heal

Clinical Trials on Electroceutical Dressing Technology-EDThi

3
Subscribe