Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Performance in Sports

July 8, 2021 updated by: Marmara University

Dual Task Performance of Soccer Referees: Cognitive Task or Motor Task

In this study, it is aimed to examine the dual-task performance of soccer referees. For this purpose, it will be investigated whether the motor or cognitive performance of the referees changes when dual-task is assigned and also whether there are differences in dual-task performance between the referees and athletes with similar training program.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study, the motor and cognitive dual-task performances of referees will be evaluated. It also will be investigated whether the referees prioritize one of the performances, motor or cognitive, during the dual-task and whether their role in the competition makes a difference compared to athletes. For this purpose, appropriate motor and cognitive tasks were determined by considering the roles of the referees during the competition.

After completing the Demographic Information Form respectively; Edgren Side Step Agility Test as motor performance assessment, Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) as cognitive performance assessment, and finally Dual-Task evaluation using MOT and Edgren Side Step Agility Test will be applied simultaneously. Dual-task costs will be calculated as a percentage of single-task for both motor and cognitive tasks.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34854
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 26 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Soccer referees affiliated with the National Football Federation and athletes with similar to soccer referees in terms of sociodemographic and physical characteristics and training program.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be a soccer referee who trains for a total of 5 hours two days a week, takes part in a maximum of two competitions a week and has been actively affiliated with the National Football Federation for at least 1 year,
  • Being an athlete with similar to soccer referees in terms of sociodemographic and physical characteristics and training program,
  • Being between aged 18-30 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not attending weekly trainings regularly,
  • Having had a surgical operation in the last year,
  • Having a history of trauma in the last 6 months,
  • Not being able to communicate,
  • Having uncorrected visual deficit and hearing problem.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Referees
There will be no interventions. Motor and cognitive assessments will be conducted.
Athletes
There will be no interventions. Motor and cognitive assessments will be conducted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multiple Object Tracking (MOT)
Time Frame: 20 minutes

Multiple object tracking (MOT) (4 targets), a computer-based cognitive test, is used. Before the test starts, four of the eight black dots on the white screen are randomly determined by flashing. The participant then follows these moving points and marks the correct points after the black dots stop. The selected correct points are noted and saved as P - Proper selection rate in the participant's file.

After the MOT test is taught, the test is completed in two different speed parameters (240msec, 300msec) in 10sec x 5 repetitions for each speed.

20 minutes
Edgren Side Step Test
Time Frame: 20 minutes
It is done to test the individual's agility, side speed, and body control. After 15 minutes of warm-up (dynamic stretching and low-pace forward / side running), the Edgren Side Step Test is explained and shown by the researcher.For testing, 5 cones are placed at 1-meter intervals on a 4-meter wide line on a flat non-slip floor. The participant is asked to wait in the middle line with her legs open. During the 10 seconds test, it is asked to step as quickly as possible to the right and left outer cones. It should be ensured that the face is facing forward and that the feet move sideways. After confirming that the test was performed correctly, the best score in the agility test (distance-meter covered in 10 sec) is recorded by applying 3 repetitions.
20 minutes
Dual Task Assessment
Time Frame: 20 minutes
After performing the single tasks (Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) and Edgren Side Step Test) separately, participants are taken into double task evaluation. While standing in the starting position of the Edgren Side Stepping Test, the MOT test is opened on the screen placed directly opposite the viewing distance (2-meters). After the flashing of the points to be followed at the beginning of the MOT, the MOT and Edgren Side Step Test are started simultaneously with the movement of the points. At the end of 10 seconds, the distance traveled is recorded in meters and the points of the MOT test are followed by the mouse. Dual-Task Assessment is repeated 3 times for each 2 different MOT speeds and scores are recorded.
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Semra Oğuz, Phd, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Nilufer Keskin Dilbay, MSc, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Hilal B Can, MSc, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no a plan to make IPD available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Task Performance

Subscribe