Visual Perception Exploration Using Eye-tracking Technology in High-fidelity Medical Simulation

February 7, 2017 updated by: Issam Tanoubi
The aim of this observational study is to compare the visual interests between residents in high-fidelity simulation practice

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eighteen first year residents were asked to take part in a nine-minute scenario based on an ACLS bradycardia algorithm in which a high-fidelity mannequin required external pacing. The scenario was considered a success if the material was correctly set by the participant to obtain electrical and mechanical pacing in nine minutes. All participants were wearing Tobii Glasses® which is a mobile eye-tracking system that automatically aggregates gaze data. Infrared markers were placed in the simulation room to create Area of Interest (AOI), from which results were obtained. Three AOI were created: the vital signs monitor, the defibrillator/pacing unit and the head of the patient. Eye-tracking data were analyzed using the Tobii Studio® program.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

First-year medical residents from various specialties at Université de Montréal Simulation center

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First-year residents from various specialties in their first three weeks of training

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Underwent a previous residency
  • Attending physicians in another country

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Success at the simulation
Participant could correctly set the pacing unit to obtain electrical and mechanical pacing of the mannequin in nine minutes.
A 9-minute scenario based on an ACLS bradycardia algorithm in which a high-fidelity mannequin requires external pacing
Failed the simulation
Participant could not correctly set the pacing unit to obtain electrical and mechanical pacing of the mannequin in nine minutes.
A 9-minute scenario based on an ACLS bradycardia algorithm in which a high-fidelity mannequin requires external pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first fixation, Total visit time
Time Frame: During the scenario
Using eye-tracking technology, gaze date can be aggregate onto Areas of interest where data can be extrapolated.
During the scenario

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 14, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 18, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MMT-2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Simulation Training

Clinical Trials on Simulation

3
Subscribe