Electronic Record Assimilation and Subsequent Eradication of Hepatitis C (ERASE-C)

September 15, 2021 updated by: Aparna Goel, Stanford University

Targeted Electronic Patient Portal Messaging Increases Hepatitis C Virus Screening in Primary Care: a Randomized Study

Given the disproportionately high risk of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the baby boomer cohort, population-based screening has been demonstrated cost effective. Compared to point-of-care testing, however, bulk health messages with coupled lab requisitions delivered directly to patients meeting screening criteria via patient portals could improve HCV screening at minimal cost.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United States Preventative Services Taskforce (USPSTF) recommend a one-time hepatitis C infection (HCV) screen in individuals born 1945-65 (baby boomer birth cohort) and in others with risk factors for infection. National adherence to this Grade B recommendation-carrying the same strength of evidence as mammography, and screening for depression, alcohol abuse, and type 2 diabetes-is estimated to be 13.8%. Efforts to increase screening and linkage to HCV care, and also to understand barriers to screening and linkage are therefore warranted.

One such intervention, direct-to-patient messages via electronic medical record (EMR), has been demonstrated to improve adherence in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, colon cancer screening, immunosuppression after transplantation, among others, but has not been studied as a strategy to improve HCV screening rates within health systems.

Our institution, Stanford Health Care, comprises 86 distinct clinical sites with approximately 1.25 million outpatient visits per year. All clinical sites are linked with an EMR (Epic Systems Corp.) and patients are encouraged to opt-in to receive and send health-related messages through a secure internet and smartphone portal, MyHealth. Approximately 60% of patients at our institution are enrolled in MyHealth.

MyHealth additionally allows bulk-messaging of patients meeting specific characteristics, e.g. patients due for influenza vaccination. Bulk messages can be coupled with laboratory or radiology requisitions. Messages are delivered through the online portal, text message, e-mail, and/or smartphone application notification, depending on patient preference. Laboratory and radiology results are routed automatically to patients' primary care physicians for review.

The investigators propose to conduct a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of a direct-to-patient electronic health message on HCV screening coupled with a lab requisition, versus HCV screening initiated by primary care clinicians as part of routine clinical care alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

54 years to 74 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • persons born between 1945-1965
  • having an activated patient portal to receive secure messages (MyHealth)
  • no prior HCV antibody test within our EHR (electronic health record), including externally accessible results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • documented HCV viral load in our EHR
  • diagnosis of chronic HCV in their problem list

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No primary care provider (PCP) appointment, No patient outreach
400 patients that did not have an upcoming PCP appointment in 6 months were randomly assigned to control group and did not receive a patient portal message with order for HCV antibody screening
Active Comparator: No PCP appointment, Patient outreach
400 patients that did not have an upcoming PCP appointment in 6 months were randomly assigned to receive a patient portal message with order for HCV antibody screening
Direct-to-patient message via the electronic patient portal (MyHealth) with HCV antibody lab order directed to their preferred laboratory
Other Names:
  • outreach
No Intervention: PCP appointment, No patient outreach
400 patients that had an upcoming PCP appointment in 6 months were randomly assigned to control group and did not receive a patient portal message with order for HCV antibody screening
Active Comparator: PCP appointment, Patient outreach
400 patients that had an upcoming PCP appointment in 6 months were randomly assigned to receive a patient portal message with order for HCV antibody screening
Direct-to-patient message via the electronic patient portal (MyHealth) with HCV antibody lab order directed to their preferred laboratory
Other Names:
  • outreach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of HCV antibody test completion
Time Frame: 6 months
completion of HCV antibody test
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of positive HCV antibody or positive HCV RNA referred for treatment
Time Frame: 8 months
referral to subspecialty for treatment of chronic HCV infection
8 months
Rate of subspecialty visit completion
Time Frame: 3 months
attended subspecialty visit for treatment
3 months
Rate of HCV treatment initiation
Time Frame: 10 months
chronic HCV treatment started
10 months
Rate of sustained virologic response
Time Frame: 10 months
HCV cured
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aparna Goel, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data will not be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on Patient portal message

Subscribe