Self-help App and Wellbeing

July 24, 2022 updated by: VTan

Does Using a Self-help App to Improve Wellbeing Work? - An Experimental Follow-up Study

Anxiety and worry are amongst the most common mental health difficulties. The Second Mental Health Study found a significant increase in the lifetime prevalence for GAD, from 0.9% to 1.6%. In addition, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development found that among Singaporean students, 86% experienced anxiety levels that were significantly higher than the OECD average.

Past research revealed that individuals who worried more experienced decreases in life satisfaction. It was also found that worry and anxiety are significant predictors of one's psychological wellbeing .

In line with this trend, the market for wellbeing apps have been one of the fastest growing categories of apps ever since; with more than 10,000 on the market. Studies have shown that the use of wellbeing apps has been correlated with an improvement in mental wellbeing. However, due to the lack of research that focuses on disorder-specific evidence, there still exists debates around the effectiveness of wellbeing apps on anxiety and worry. In addition, the lack of research on the mediating factor of psychological mindedness in the relationship between the use of wellbeing apps and mental well-being, could be pivotal to the effectiveness of wellbeing apps.

To show the effectiveness of evidence-based wellbeing apps in targeting anxiety and worry, this study will employ the engagement of participants with a wellbeing app for a controlled period of 2 weeks before recording their mental wellbeing outcomes.This paradigm has been replicated extensively through multiple studies.

This study will use a between-groups experimental study design whereby participants will be block randomised into 2 conditions: Active control condition, and Anxiety condition. Each condition will be given a restricted version of the wellbeing app according to their treatment groups. Follow-up data will be collected at 2-weeks post intervention to establish efficacy of the intervention.

Objective 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of a wellbeing app self-help programme for reducing anxiety and worry.

Objective 2: To examine if psychological mindedness moderates hypothesised effects of wellbeing app usage and anxiety and worry.

Hypothesis 1: Participants in the intervention group will report significantly lower anxiety and worry than participants in the control group.

Hypothesis 2: Psychological mindedness will moderate the effect of the wellbeing app's self-help programme on anxiety and worry: Participants high in psychological mindedness will benefit more from the wellbeing apps than those with lower scores on psychological mindedness.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

492

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 119077
        • National University of Singapore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old for NUS students, or 21 for non NUS students

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who do not meet the age requirement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anxiety Group
Participants will download the anxiety application to their own handphones, and will complete the programme subsequently in their own time over the course of 2 weeks. The expected duration participants will spend on the anxiety application daily is estimated to be around 5 to 10 minutes, amounting to a total of around 140 minutes (2 hours and 10 minutes) during the 2 weeks intervention. Participants in the anxiety group are asked to complete daily brief exercises. For example, they will practice noticing worry thoughts and journal them down.
The Intellect mobile app (containing the anxiety application) can be freely downloaded from the App store and Google Play store for free. The app provides access to the different programmes. The mobile app has been pilot tested by Intellect before the release on the App and Google Play store. However, for this research project Intellect is going to provide the the programmes as stand alone applications exclusively for the participants of this research.
Active Comparator: Procrastination Group
Participants will download the procrastination application to their own handphones, and will complete the programme subsequently in their own time over the course of 2 weeks. The expected duration participants will spend on the procrastination application daily is estimated to be around 5 to 10 minutes, amounting to a total of around 140 minutes (2 hours and 10 minutes) during the 2 weeks intervention. Participants in the procrastination group are asked to complete daily brief exercises. For example, they will practice to reduce procrastination-related thoughts.
The Intellect mobile app (containing the procrastination application) can be freely downloaded from the App store and Google Play store for free. The app provides access to the different programmes. The mobile app has been pilot tested by Intellect before the release on the App and Google Play store. However, for this research project Intellect is going to provide the the programmes as stand alone applications exclusively for the participants of this research.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Measured before the intervention
General Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7) is a 7 item self report instrument that measures anxiety and is widely used in research in clinical and nonclinical practices anxiety as a continuum (Siddaway, Taylor & Wood, 2018) and is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing anxiety in a general population (Löwe et al., 2008). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". GAD-7 produced an excellent internal consistency of α=0.92 in a sample of 2982 participants (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Löwe, 2006).
Measured before the intervention
General Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)
General Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7) is a 7 item self report instrument that measures anxiety and is widely used in research in clinical and nonclinical practices anxiety as a continuum (Siddaway, Taylor & Wood, 2018) and is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing anxiety in a general population (Löwe et al., 2008). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". GAD-7 produced an excellent internal consistency of α=0.92 in a sample of 2982 participants (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Löwe, 2006).
1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)
General Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the completion of the intervention
General Anxiety Disorder- 7 (GAD-7) is a 7 item self report instrument that measures anxiety and is widely used in research in clinical and nonclinical practices anxiety as a continuum (Siddaway, Taylor & Wood, 2018) and is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing anxiety in a general population (Löwe et al., 2008). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". GAD-7 produced an excellent internal consistency of α=0.92 in a sample of 2982 participants (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Löwe, 2006).
2 weeks after the completion of the intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Measured before the intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) i s a 9 item self report instrument that measures depression. Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". In a sample of 3000 patients in the PHQ Primary Care Study, PHQ-9 achieved an excellent internal consistency of α=0.89 (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001).
Measured before the intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) i s a 9 item self report instrument that measures depression. Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". In a sample of 3000 patients in the PHQ Primary Care Study, PHQ-9 achieved an excellent internal consistency of α=0.89 (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001).
1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the completion of the intervention
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) i s a 9 item self report instrument that measures depression. Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from "not at all (0)", "several days (1)", "more than half the days (2)" and "nearly everyday (3)". In a sample of 3000 patients in the PHQ Primary Care Study, PHQ-9 achieved an excellent internal consistency of α=0.89 (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001).
2 weeks after the completion of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological Mindedness Scale
Time Frame: Measured before the intervention
Psychological Mindedness Scale (PM): 45 item self report instrument that measures an individual's ability to be reflective about interpersonal relationships, psychological processes and meanings across both intellectual and emotional dimensions. Items are scored on a 4 point-scale ranging from "strongly agree (4)" to "strongly disagree (1)". The PM has a good internal consistency of α= 0.86 and recomputed to 0.87 in a study of 256 patients (Conte et al., 1990).
Measured before the intervention
App Engagement Scale
Time Frame: Measured 1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)
App Engagement Scale (AES): 7 item self report feedback instrument that indicates the degree to which an individual engages with an app. Items are scored on a 5 point-scale ranging from "strongly agree (5)" to "strongly disagree (1)". This App Engagement Scale had good internal reliability, Cronbach's α = .839 in a study of 1349 app user (Rickard & Bakker, 2019).
Measured 1-2 days after completing the intervention (2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Oliver Suendermann, National University of Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NUS-IRB-2021-266

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Research data will be stored in an encrypted NUS nbox folder with viewing-only permissions set and restricted to the PI and co-investigator. Primary data will be kept secured in electronic form by the PI and co-investigator in a format that precludes subsequent alteration. Research data files (e.g Excel sheets) will only be accessible by PI and Co-PI. Survey data will be collected on Qualtrics secured with an account password and 2FA verification. Upon completion of the data collection, personal identifiable information(e.g. matric number from RP pool students) will be removed from the Qualtrics file, and the MS Excelsheet containing the data will be encrypted and stored in an encrypted NUS nbox folder, accessible only by the PI and Co-investigator. App data will be linked to a participant code given to participants. However, no personal identifiable data will be collected through the wellbeing app programs. Personal data will be only be shared with PI and Co-I as mentioned above.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety and Worry

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Application

3
Subscribe