Training Mental Habits Study

March 13, 2020 updated by: Naomi Koerner, Ryerson University

An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Concrete Thinking on Worry, Problem-Solving and Cognitive Processing in Individuals With Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is a chronic condition whose hallmark feature is excessive and uncontrollable worry (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Theories of GAD propose that specific cognitive biases are involved in the maintenance and etiology of chronic worry. One cognitive bias that plays a role in worrying is abstract thinking, or the tendency to "verbalize" thoughts and worries in a manner that is vague and lacking in detail. There is evidence that training depressed people to think more concretely improves depressive symptoms and depression-type thinking styles, and reduces emotional reactivity. Given that chronic worry and depression have commonalities (e.g., repetitive thinking styles, difficulties with problem-solving and attentional control, emotion dysregulation), concreteness training may help people who struggle with chronic worry. The main goals of this proof of concept experiment are 1) to test in individuals reporting chronic worry the effects of an active form of concreteness training that involves imagery practice (compared to a no training control condition) on frequency of worrying, problem solving quality, and worry-related processes; 2) to examine the degree to which concreteness training causes improvements in daily worry and negative affect during the 7 days of practice. The study design will provide us with an understanding on a more "macro" level of the potential short-term benefits and will at the same time allow us to see, on a more "micro" level, how training concreteness affects worry and mood on a day-to-day basis during a 7-day period. The findings from this study will inform relevant clinical literature about efficacious methods to reduce chronic worry.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The main goals of this proof of concept experiment are 1) to test in individuals reporting chronic worry the effects of an active form of concreteness training that involves imagery practice (compared to a no training control condition) on frequency of worrying, problem solving quality, and worry-related processes; 2) to examine the degree to which concreteness training causes improvements in daily worry and negative affect during the 7 days of practice. Participants are recruited from the community via advertisements. Following a telephone screen, participants attend a baseline visit during which they complete the MINI interview. Those who continue to be eligible complete the outcome measures and are randomly assigned to either the experimental condition or the control condition. Participants assigned to the experimental condition receive training in concrete processing and learn how to complete the daily experience sampling diary. Participants assigned to the control condition do not receive training and learn how to complete the daily experience sampling diary. All participants then complete their assigned activities for 7 days. They then return to the lab to complete the outcome measures at post-test, 1 week follow up and 1 month follow up. Participants are then debriefed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 2K3
        • Psychology Research and Training Centre, Ryerson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion:

  1. Penn State Worry Questionnaire (trait) score meeting threshold of 65 or higher.
  2. Endorsement of symptoms consistent with Generalized Anxiety Disorder on the MINI interview with a CSR equal to or greater than 4.
  3. If other symptoms are present, associated CSR is at least 1 point lower than the CSR associated with GAD symptoms

Exclusion

  1. Having a current or past history of mania or psychosis, or endorsement of symptoms consistent with a substance use disorder in the past 12 months.
  2. Reporting of suicidal ideation, intent or plan.
  3. Participants are excluded if they are currently receiving psychological treatment or counseling unless this treatment is infrequent (meeting once monthly or less) or the participant has been receiving consistent weekly treatment for 12 weeks and still meets all other eligibility criteria.
  4. Psychotropic medication with a change in dose in the past 12 weeks. If they have recently discontinued a psychotropic medication, they will be included if it has been at least 1 month since discontinuation or 3 months in the case of fluoxetine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Concreteness Training
Participants receive 1 session of training in concrete processing during the pre-intervention visit. They are then asked to engage in 30 minutes of concreteness practice daily, for 7 days.
No Intervention: Control
Assessment only.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in worry as measured by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire - Past Week
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in negative problem orientation as measured by the Negative Problem Orientation Questionnaire
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in quality of problem-solving as measured by The Means-Ends Problem-Solving task
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in problem solving style as measured by the Social Problem Solving Inventory Revised
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Change in attentional control as measured by the Attentional Control Scale
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in residual working memory capacity as measured by the Random Interval Generation Task
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
- Change in interpretation bias as measured by the Ambiguous/ Unambiguous Situations Diary Extended
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in cognitive avoidance as measured by the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in worry as measured by experience sampling completed during the 7 days between baseline and post test
Time Frame: Daily during 7-day intervention period
Daily during 7-day intervention period
Change in affect as measured by experience sampling completed during the 7 days between baseline and post test
Time Frame: Daily during 7-day intervention period
Daily during 7-day intervention period
Change in concreteness as measured by experience sampling completed during the 7 days between baseline and post test.
Time Frame: Daily during 7-day intervention period
Daily during 7-day intervention period
Change in GAD-Q-IV severity
Time Frame: this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up
this measure is administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1 week follow up and at 1 month follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in trait anxiety as measured by STICSA
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1 month follow up
Change in mood/affect as measured by PANAS
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up.
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up.
Change in intolerance of uncertainty as measured by the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Change in emotion dysregulation as measured by the DERS
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Change in distress tolerance as measured by the Distress Tolerance Scale
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Change in imagery use as measured by the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale [
Time Frame: Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up
Administered at baseline, at post-test (1 week post baseline), at 1-week follow up and at 1-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-146-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Generalized Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Concreteness Training

3
Subscribe