Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa (BOHEMIA) (BOHEMIA)

March 11, 2025 updated by: Barcelona Institute for Global Health

A Phase III Cluster-randomized, Open-label, Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration to Reduce Malaria Transmission in Two African Settings

The BOHEMIA program consists of a combination of studies organized around a central community prevention mass drug administration protocol and four sub-studies (i.e.; social science, entomology, health economics, and environmental), each written as an individual protocol. The protocol is central but used in two separate, individually powered trials in Mozambique and Kenya. The trials have been powered on the efficacy outcome and designed to meet the requirements of World Health Organization's (WHO) preferred product characteristics (PPC) for endectocides.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

WHO's PPC states that the desired efficacy of an endectocide as stand-alone insecticide in areas of high to moderate transmission is at least 20% reduction in the incidence of clinical malaria (as primary outcome) and incidence of infection (as secondary outcome) in children under 5 years old (the highest incidence age-group in areas with high-transmission), lasting for at least 1 month following a single regimen. Assessing this effect requires a cluster-randomized design with meticulous follow-up of a cohort of children for efficacy and the whole exposed population for safety outcomes, which is the design selected for the BOHEMIA trials.

Two BOHEMIA cluster randomized trials will be carried out in Mozambique (Southern Africa) and Kenya (Eastern Africa). These sites encompass different transmission dynamics that increase the generalizability of results, namely: (a) a gradient of malaria transmission: moderate in Kenya and very high in Mozambique, (b) different species composition of vector population, (c) different rain patterns and environmental conditions, and (d) different livestock species and human/livestock ratios (in Mozambique).

Population:

Co-primary objectives are determined in different populations. Efficacy is primarily determined in a pediatric active cohort (children under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya), and safety is determined in anyone who receives the drug. Pregnant women and children under 15 kgs are not eligible for treatment.

Treatment Groups:

Two groups of clusters (three in Mozambique) will be randomized to receive (a) ivermectin in humans, (b) ivermectin in humans + livestock (only in Mozambique), or (c) albendazole control. In Mozambique, the study district will be subject to enhanced passive surveillance for malaria.

Primary Outcome Measure:

The primary outcome measure is proposed as incidence in a six-month period given that ivermectin is a short-acting intervention with <1% residual drug at 30 days after each dose. Efficacy assessment will continue 4 months post last dose of ivermectin, and this will include analysis of the vector population. We have proposed the appropriate duration of impact evaluation relevant to the biology of the intervention, and geared towards being able to clean the data, lock the database, and conduct the primary efficacy and safety analysis efficiently.

Estimated Duration of Study:

Throughout the study there will be two different groups of participants enrolled, the ones receiving the treatment (>15 kg) and the ones in the active pediatric cohort for the main outcome of malaria incidence (the ages of highest incidence in each country, under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya). Each group will participate for different periods of time.

Only the group enrolled in the active pediatric cohort will contribute to the primary efficacy outcome and this group will participate from date of first dose for six months. The group receiving treatment (>15 kg) will contribute to the primary safety outcome and several secondary outcomes (PK, Neglected Tropical Diseases [NTDs]) and this group will participate for four months. Women of child-bearing age will be visited one month after the third dose for a final pregnancy test, any pregnancy occurring during the trial will be followed until birth. The cross-sectional survey will enroll participants of all ages one month after the last Mass Drug Administration (MDA) round.

WHO guidance states that trial design and duration should reflect the nature of the intervention and are left at the discretion of researchers. These trials are robustly powered and are being conducted in moderate to high burden areas, so we believe the risk of failing to find an effect is low and if so, it would throw the utility of the intervention into question.

Advancing the development of this new tool towards implementation in the field can be accomplished in a time frame to contribute to the 2030 Global Technical Strategy (GTS) goals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48145

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kwale, Kenya, 90100
        • KEMRI
    • Zambezia
      • Mopeia, Zambezia, Mozambique
        • CISM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 week to 99 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

For human treatment/safety cohort:

  • Residents of the study area
  • Male or female weighing more than 15kg
  • Adult able to provide written consent
  • Minors aged 12 to 17 able to provide assent
  • Parent/guardian's able to provide consent for minors
  • Negative pregnancy test for women aged between 13 and 49
  • Agreement to adhere to study visits and procedures

For pediatric active cohort:

  • Children in the age of highest burden at the time of enrollment (under 5 years of age in Mozambique or 5-15 in Kenya)
  • Residents of the study area
  • Parent/guardian's able to provide consent for minors
  • Minors aged 12 to 15 in Kenya able to provide assent

For cross sectionals:

  • Residents of the area for at least 3 months prior to enrolment
  • Parent/guardian's consent for minors
  • Ability to provide assent for minors aged 12 to 17
  • Written consent from adults

For livestock treatment:

  • Owner/guardian able to provide consent
  • Animal expected to spend at least one week every study month inside the cluster border

Exclusion Criteria

For human treatment/safety cohort:

  • Known hypersensitivity to ivermectin or albendazole
  • Risk of Loa as assessed by travel history to Angola, Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Nigeria or Sudan
  • Pregnant women
  • Lactating women in the first week postpartum
  • Children < 15 kg
  • Currently participating in another clinical trial
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent or assent
  • Unwilling to adhere to study visits and/or procedures
  • Severely ill either self-reported or in the eyes of the investigator, e.g. defined as need for clinical care, or active or progressive disease interfering with activities of daily living. If in doubt, these criteria can be confirmed after a call with either the site PI/MD/safety officer against a pre-defined list.
  • Currently under treatment with inhibitors of CYP3A or P-gp or other drugs that can interfere with the study

For incidence cohort:

  • Non-residents
  • Currently enrolled in other clinical trial

For cross sectionals:

• Non-residents

For livestock treatment (Mozambique):

  • Received ivermectin less than four weeks ago
  • Intention to milk or slaughter the animal for human consumption during the withdrawal period (28 days after dosing)
  • Calves under 8 weeks and piglets under 6 weeks of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Albendazole
The albendazole group will receive a single dose of 400 mg, given once a month for three months. Generic products will be used in both countries, the final product will be GMP certified and fully bioequivalent with GSK's Albenza®. Bendex (CIPLA) in Mozambique and G-Abzole (Guilin) in Kenya.
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer albendazole using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
  • Alben, Bendex
Experimental: Ivermectin human
The ivermectin group will receive a single dose of 400 mcg/kg, given once a month for three months. Product to be used is Stromectol (Merck) in Mozambique and Ivermectin 3mg USP (Edenbridge) in Kenya.
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer ivermectin using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
  • Stromectol
Experimental: Ivermectin human and livestock (Mozambique only)
The ivermectin group will receive a single dose of 400 mcg/kg, given once a month for three months. Product to be used is Stromectol (Merck). For livestock, locally registered veterinary injectable ivermectin at 1% will be used.
Veterinary ivermectin injectable will be given to livestock in the relevant cluster
Other Names:
  • Veterinary Ivermectin 1%
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer ivermectin using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
  • Stromectol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the safety (in humans) and efficacy of ivermectin MDA, administered to humans, or humans and livestock simultaneously (only in Mozambique) for the prevention of malaria.
Time Frame: 6 months

Efficacy:

The efficacy endpoint is primarily measured in children (under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years old in Kenya) and safety is determined by anyone who receives the drug.

Infection incidence in the most vulnerable age group (children under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) for 6 months from the moment of the first MDA round in their community. Infection incidence has been chosen as primary endpoint based on the WHOs PPC for endectocides.

6 months
To determine the safety (in humans) and efficacy of ivermectin MDA, administered to humans, or humans and livestock simultaneously (only in Mozambique) for the prevention of malaria.
Time Frame: 6 months

Safety:

The safety endpoint is determined by anyone who receives the drug.

Rate of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and difference between ivermectin and albendazole.

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
Time to first positive RDT in children in the cohort.
6 months
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
Molecular force of infection in a subset of children in the cohort.
6 months
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
Malaria case incidence in all ages presenting at health facility.
6 months
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
Malaria prevalence in all ages one month after the last dose.
6 months
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
Multiplicity of infection in all ages one month after the last dose.
6 months
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
Observed tolerability of the dose.
12 months
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
AEs and SAEs by organ system.
12 months
To assess the PK of the proposed ivermectin dose/regime in its relationship with efficacy and safety outcomes (efficacy and safety).
Time Frame: 72 hours
Whole blood concentrations of ivermectin in dried blood spots.
72 hours
To assess the impact of ivermectin MDA at the proposed regimen on the prevalence of selected ectoparasitic NTDs (efficacy on NTDs and acceptability).
Time Frame: 6 months
  • Serial prevalence of scabies using a simplified version of the algorithm described by Mahe et al.
  • Serial prevalence of head lice by visual inspection.
  • Serial prevalence of Tunga penetrans via visual inspection of the skin in both feet and applying the Fortaleza scale.
  • Serial prevalence and severity of bed bug infestation by direct questions about bedbugs in the house.
6 months
To assess the relationship between malaria incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) and community prevalence at the peak of the malaria season.
Time Frame: 6 months

Prevalence - incidence correlation:

- Malaria infection incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) in the pediatric active cohort at community and health facility levels.

6 months
To assess the relationship between malaria incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) and community prevalence at the peak of the malaria season.
Time Frame: 6 months

Prevalence - incidence correlation:

- Malaria prevalence at all ages.

6 months
To assess the relationship between active and passive surveillance for malaria at health facility (only Mozambique).
Time Frame: 18 months
  • Infection incidence in children at community level (active surveillance)
  • Infection incidence in children at health facility level (passive surveillance)
18 months
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to PCR (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
Results correlation between RDTs and PCR
6 months
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to PCR (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of RDT negative but PCR positive infections
6 months
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
Rate of Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs).
12 months
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
Results correlation between HRP2 and pLDH-based RDTs
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the relationship between self-reported pregnancy status, last menstrual period (LMP), and the results of pregnancy tests in women of reproductive age participating in the study.
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate the correlation between self-reported pregnancy status, the LMP and the results of urine pregnancy tests in women of reproductive age participating in the study
3 months
To assess all-cause and malaria-related mortality in intervention and control arms (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 18 months
Rate of all-cause and malaria-related mortality as determined by health facility records and BOHEMIA safety reporting during the trial.
18 months
To assess all-cause and malaria-related mortality in intervention and control arms (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 18 months
Verbal autopsies of deaths of participants on both cohorts (Mozambique).
18 months
To estimate the prevalence of relevant CYP and P-gp variations in the target population and subjects suffering from Central Nervous System (CNS)-AEs (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 3 months
Case-control association study of ivermectin-associated neurological adverse effects with genetic variation in CYP3A5 and ABCB1 and assess the association of the same genetic variants with ivermectin PK.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Regina Rabinovich, Barcelona Institute of Global Health
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Chaccour, Barcelona Institute of Global Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In order to ensure that the Project Results may be shared and ISGlobal will make the fully anonymized data generated by the Project publicly available on open access terms in an appropriate online data repository: (i) at the same time as publication, in relation to data supporting, or which may be necessary to validate, the main findings of any publication; (ii) no later than six (6) months after the end of the Project Term, in relation to all other data which may have public health value

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Protocol and ICF: upon ethical approval SAP: before finishing enrolment CSR and code: within 12 months of completion of the trial

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

TBD, Free-to-access, publicly available, searchable institutional website

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe