- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04966702
Broad One Health Endectocide-based Malaria Intervention in Africa (BOHEMIA) (BOHEMIA)
A Phase III Cluster-randomized, Open-label, Clinical Trial to Study the Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration to Reduce Malaria Transmission in Two African Settings
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
WHO's PPC states that the desired efficacy of an endectocide as stand-alone insecticide in areas of high to moderate transmission is at least 20% reduction in the incidence of clinical malaria (as primary outcome) and incidence of infection (as secondary outcome) in children under 5 years old (the highest incidence age-group in areas with high-transmission), lasting for at least 1 month following a single regimen. Assessing this effect requires a cluster-randomized design with meticulous follow-up of a cohort of children for efficacy and the whole exposed population for safety outcomes, which is the design selected for the BOHEMIA trials.
Two BOHEMIA cluster randomized trials will be carried out in Mozambique (Southern Africa) and Kenya (Eastern Africa). These sites encompass different transmission dynamics that increase the generalizability of results, namely: (a) a gradient of malaria transmission: moderate in Kenya and very high in Mozambique, (b) different species composition of vector population, (c) different rain patterns and environmental conditions, and (d) different livestock species and human/livestock ratios (in Mozambique).
Population:
Co-primary objectives are determined in different populations. Efficacy is primarily determined in a pediatric active cohort (children under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya), and safety is determined in anyone who receives the drug. Pregnant women and children under 15 kgs are not eligible for treatment.
Treatment Groups:
Two groups of clusters (three in Mozambique) will be randomized to receive (a) ivermectin in humans, (b) ivermectin in humans + livestock (only in Mozambique), or (c) albendazole control. In Mozambique, the study district will be subject to enhanced passive surveillance for malaria.
Primary Outcome Measure:
The primary outcome measure is proposed as incidence in a six-month period given that ivermectin is a short-acting intervention with <1% residual drug at 30 days after each dose. Efficacy assessment will continue 4 months post last dose of ivermectin, and this will include analysis of the vector population. We have proposed the appropriate duration of impact evaluation relevant to the biology of the intervention, and geared towards being able to clean the data, lock the database, and conduct the primary efficacy and safety analysis efficiently.
Estimated Duration of Study:
Throughout the study there will be two different groups of participants enrolled, the ones receiving the treatment (>15 kg) and the ones in the active pediatric cohort for the main outcome of malaria incidence (the ages of highest incidence in each country, under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya). Each group will participate for different periods of time.
Only the group enrolled in the active pediatric cohort will contribute to the primary efficacy outcome and this group will participate from date of first dose for six months. The group receiving treatment (>15 kg) will contribute to the primary safety outcome and several secondary outcomes (PK, Neglected Tropical Diseases [NTDs]) and this group will participate for four months. Women of child-bearing age will be visited one month after the third dose for a final pregnancy test, any pregnancy occurring during the trial will be followed until birth. The cross-sectional survey will enroll participants of all ages one month after the last Mass Drug Administration (MDA) round.
WHO guidance states that trial design and duration should reflect the nature of the intervention and are left at the discretion of researchers. These trials are robustly powered and are being conducted in moderate to high burden areas, so we believe the risk of failing to find an effect is low and if so, it would throw the utility of the intervention into question.
Advancing the development of this new tool towards implementation in the field can be accomplished in a time frame to contribute to the 2030 Global Technical Strategy (GTS) goals.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kwale, Kenya, 90100
- KEMRI
-
-
-
-
Zambezia
-
Mopeia, Zambezia, Mozambique
- CISM
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
For human treatment/safety cohort:
- Residents of the study area
- Male or female weighing more than 15kg
- Adult able to provide written consent
- Minors aged 12 to 17 able to provide assent
- Parent/guardian's able to provide consent for minors
- Negative pregnancy test for women aged between 13 and 49
- Agreement to adhere to study visits and procedures
For pediatric active cohort:
- Children in the age of highest burden at the time of enrollment (under 5 years of age in Mozambique or 5-15 in Kenya)
- Residents of the study area
- Parent/guardian's able to provide consent for minors
- Minors aged 12 to 15 in Kenya able to provide assent
For cross sectionals:
- Residents of the area for at least 3 months prior to enrolment
- Parent/guardian's consent for minors
- Ability to provide assent for minors aged 12 to 17
- Written consent from adults
For livestock treatment:
- Owner/guardian able to provide consent
- Animal expected to spend at least one week every study month inside the cluster border
Exclusion Criteria
For human treatment/safety cohort:
- Known hypersensitivity to ivermectin or albendazole
- Risk of Loa as assessed by travel history to Angola, Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic, Congo, DR Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Nigeria or Sudan
- Pregnant women
- Lactating women in the first week postpartum
- Children < 15 kg
- Currently participating in another clinical trial
- Unwilling to provide informed consent or assent
- Unwilling to adhere to study visits and/or procedures
- Severely ill either self-reported or in the eyes of the investigator, e.g. defined as need for clinical care, or active or progressive disease interfering with activities of daily living. If in doubt, these criteria can be confirmed after a call with either the site PI/MD/safety officer against a pre-defined list.
- Currently under treatment with inhibitors of CYP3A or P-gp or other drugs that can interfere with the study
For incidence cohort:
- Non-residents
- Currently enrolled in other clinical trial
For cross sectionals:
• Non-residents
For livestock treatment (Mozambique):
- Received ivermectin less than four weeks ago
- Intention to milk or slaughter the animal for human consumption during the withdrawal period (28 days after dosing)
- Calves under 8 weeks and piglets under 6 weeks of age
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Albendazole
The albendazole group will receive a single dose of 400 mg, given once a month for three months.
Generic products will be used in both countries, the final product will be GMP certified and fully bioequivalent with GSK's Albenza®.
Bendex (CIPLA) in Mozambique and G-Abzole (Guilin) in Kenya.
|
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer albendazole using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Ivermectin human
The ivermectin group will receive a single dose of 400 mcg/kg, given once a month for three months.
Product to be used is Stromectol (Merck) in Mozambique and Ivermectin 3mg USP (Edenbridge) in Kenya.
|
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer ivermectin using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Ivermectin human and livestock (Mozambique only)
The ivermectin group will receive a single dose of 400 mcg/kg, given once a month for three months.
Product to be used is Stromectol (Merck).
For livestock, locally registered veterinary injectable ivermectin at 1% will be used.
|
Veterinary ivermectin injectable will be given to livestock in the relevant cluster
Other Names:
Using a MDA approach, fieldworkers will administer ivermectin using directly observed treatment methodology to participants
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To determine the safety (in humans) and efficacy of ivermectin MDA, administered to humans, or humans and livestock simultaneously (only in Mozambique) for the prevention of malaria.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Efficacy: The efficacy endpoint is primarily measured in children (under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years old in Kenya) and safety is determined by anyone who receives the drug. Infection incidence in the most vulnerable age group (children under 5 years of age in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) for 6 months from the moment of the first MDA round in their community. Infection incidence has been chosen as primary endpoint based on the WHOs PPC for endectocides. |
6 months
|
|
To determine the safety (in humans) and efficacy of ivermectin MDA, administered to humans, or humans and livestock simultaneously (only in Mozambique) for the prevention of malaria.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Safety: The safety endpoint is determined by anyone who receives the drug. Rate of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) and difference between ivermectin and albendazole. |
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Time to first positive RDT in children in the cohort.
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Molecular force of infection in a subset of children in the cohort.
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Malaria case incidence in all ages presenting at health facility.
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Malaria prevalence in all ages one month after the last dose.
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the efficacy of the intervention using complementary methods (efficacy).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Multiplicity of infection in all ages one month after the last dose.
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Observed tolerability of the dose.
|
12 months
|
|
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
|
AEs and SAEs by organ system.
|
12 months
|
|
To assess the PK of the proposed ivermectin dose/regime in its relationship with efficacy and safety outcomes (efficacy and safety).
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Whole blood concentrations of ivermectin in dried blood spots.
|
72 hours
|
|
To assess the impact of ivermectin MDA at the proposed regimen on the prevalence of selected ectoparasitic NTDs (efficacy on NTDs and acceptability).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the relationship between malaria incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) and community prevalence at the peak of the malaria season.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Prevalence - incidence correlation: - Malaria infection incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) in the pediatric active cohort at community and health facility levels. |
6 months
|
|
To assess the relationship between malaria incidence in children (under 5 years in Mozambique and 5-15 years in Kenya) and community prevalence at the peak of the malaria season.
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Prevalence - incidence correlation: - Malaria prevalence at all ages. |
6 months
|
|
To assess the relationship between active and passive surveillance for malaria at health facility (only Mozambique).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
|
18 months
|
|
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to PCR (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Results correlation between RDTs and PCR
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to PCR (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of RDT negative but PCR positive infections
|
6 months
|
|
To assess the safety of the intervention with complementary methods (safety).
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Rate of Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs).
|
12 months
|
|
To assess the accuracy for malaria diagnosis of two the different malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) used in comparison to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (Mozambique).
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Results correlation between HRP2 and pLDH-based RDTs
|
6 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To assess the relationship between self-reported pregnancy status, last menstrual period (LMP), and the results of pregnancy tests in women of reproductive age participating in the study.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To evaluate the correlation between self-reported pregnancy status, the LMP and the results of urine pregnancy tests in women of reproductive age participating in the study
|
3 months
|
|
To assess all-cause and malaria-related mortality in intervention and control arms (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Rate of all-cause and malaria-related mortality as determined by health facility records and BOHEMIA safety reporting during the trial.
|
18 months
|
|
To assess all-cause and malaria-related mortality in intervention and control arms (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 18 months
|
Verbal autopsies of deaths of participants on both cohorts (Mozambique).
|
18 months
|
|
To estimate the prevalence of relevant CYP and P-gp variations in the target population and subjects suffering from Central Nervous System (CNS)-AEs (Mozambique only).
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Case-control association study of ivermectin-associated neurological adverse effects with genetic variation in CYP3A5 and ABCB1 and assess the association of the same genetic variants with ivermectin PK.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Regina Rabinovich, Barcelona Institute of Global Health
- Principal Investigator: Carlos Chaccour, Barcelona Institute of Global Health
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Vector Borne Diseases
- Mosquito-Borne Diseases
- Infections
- Protozoan Infections
- Parasitic Diseases
- Malaria
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Antiprotozoal Agents
- Antiparasitic Agents
- Anthelmintics
- Antiplatyhelmintic Agents
- Anticestodal Agents
- Ivermectin
- Albendazole
Other Study ID Numbers
- BOHEMIA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.