- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04977037
A Telerehabilitation Program for SCI
April 1, 2025 updated by: Nuray Yozbatiran, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Home-based Telerehabilitation Program for Recovery of Upper Limb Functions in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
This study evaluates a remotely supervised, home-based therapeutic program to improve upper-limb voluntary movement in adults with tetraplegia caused by incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) has been associated with serious reduction in functional independence.
Despite compelling evidence that treatment intensity has a profound effect on motor recovery only a small fraction of SCI population are able to receive intensive in-clinic treatment.
Difficulty traveling to the clinic, poor adherence to assignments and high cost are limiting factors.
Currently, telerehabilitation programs are emerging as an alternative effective method of delivery for rehabilitation services.
The literature and our preliminary findings support the model that augmentation of activity in spared corticospinal tract (CST) axons is a critical mechanism of motor improvement, and furthermore that CST activity can be increased by repetitive motor training and by electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1).
However, there is still lack of knowledge on safety, feasibility and efficacy of remotely- supervised home-based therapy programs that incorporates non-invasive brain stimulation and high intensity repetitive arm exercises.
To address these questions, 36 adults (above 18 years) with cervical SCI will be randomly assigned to two groups in a 2:1 ratio (active stimulation group, n=24 vs control group, n=12) and receive daily treatment, 10 sessions, over 2-weeks.
The anodal tDCS will be applied over primary motor cortex (M1) at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes and proceed with 60 minutes of repetitive arm and hand training.
Primary outcome measure is change in Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 4-weeks follow-up.
The session will be supervised in real-time via videoconferencing.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) at Memorial Hermann
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of a chronic incomplete cervical lesion as defined by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale classification and at least for 6 months post-injury;
- upper-extremity weakness associated with tetraplegia with minimal residual thumb and index; finger movement sufficient to grip small objects such as marble;
- no brain injury;
- no planned alteration in upper-extremity therapy or medication for muscle tone during the course of the study;
- no contradiction to tDCS;
- access to internet at home.
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior history of seizure;
- chronic use of neuroactive medication (e.g., neurostimulants, anticonvulsants, or antidepressants);
- any joint contracture or severe spasticity in the affected upper extremity, as measured by a Modified Ashworth Score ≥ than 3 out of 4.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active tDCS
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes
|
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes.
Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes.
Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes
|
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes.
Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes.
Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function.
GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
|
Baseline
|
|
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function.
GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function.
GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Sessions Participants Attended
Time Frame: Treatment Day 1- Day 10
|
Treatment Day 1- Day 10
|
|
|
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Participant Drop-outs
Time Frame: Between enrollment and 6 weeks
|
Between enrollment and 6 weeks
|
|
|
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Usefulness of the Intervention as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Participants rated the usefulness of the interventions on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not useful at all and 10 indicating very useful.
|
Day 10
|
|
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
|
Baseline
|
|
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
|
2 weeks
|
|
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
|
6 weeks
|
|
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
|
Baseline
|
|
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
|
from baseline to 6 weeks
|
|
|
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using tDCS as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using tDCS on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult
|
Day 10
|
|
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using Exercise Equipment as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
|
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using exercise equipment on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult.
|
Day 10
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nuray Yozbatiran, PhD, PT, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 2, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
April 2, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 23, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
July 26, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 20, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 1, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-21-0114
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.