A Telerehabilitation Program for SCI

April 1, 2025 updated by: Nuray Yozbatiran, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Home-based Telerehabilitation Program for Recovery of Upper Limb Functions in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

This study evaluates a remotely supervised, home-based therapeutic program to improve upper-limb voluntary movement in adults with tetraplegia caused by incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) has been associated with serious reduction in functional independence. Despite compelling evidence that treatment intensity has a profound effect on motor recovery only a small fraction of SCI population are able to receive intensive in-clinic treatment. Difficulty traveling to the clinic, poor adherence to assignments and high cost are limiting factors. Currently, telerehabilitation programs are emerging as an alternative effective method of delivery for rehabilitation services. The literature and our preliminary findings support the model that augmentation of activity in spared corticospinal tract (CST) axons is a critical mechanism of motor improvement, and furthermore that CST activity can be increased by repetitive motor training and by electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1). However, there is still lack of knowledge on safety, feasibility and efficacy of remotely- supervised home-based therapy programs that incorporates non-invasive brain stimulation and high intensity repetitive arm exercises. To address these questions, 36 adults (above 18 years) with cervical SCI will be randomly assigned to two groups in a 2:1 ratio (active stimulation group, n=24 vs control group, n=12) and receive daily treatment, 10 sessions, over 2-weeks. The anodal tDCS will be applied over primary motor cortex (M1) at an intensity of 2mA for 20 minutes and proceed with 60 minutes of repetitive arm and hand training. Primary outcome measure is change in Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension (GRASSP) from baseline to immediately after treatment and 4-weeks follow-up. The session will be supervised in real-time via videoconferencing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) at Memorial Hermann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. diagnosis of a chronic incomplete cervical lesion as defined by the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale classification and at least for 6 months post-injury;
  2. upper-extremity weakness associated with tetraplegia with minimal residual thumb and index; finger movement sufficient to grip small objects such as marble;
  3. no brain injury;
  4. no planned alteration in upper-extremity therapy or medication for muscle tone during the course of the study;
  5. no contradiction to tDCS;
  6. access to internet at home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. prior history of seizure;
  2. chronic use of neuroactive medication (e.g., neurostimulants, anticonvulsants, or antidepressants);
  3. any joint contracture or severe spasticity in the affected upper extremity, as measured by a Modified Ashworth Score ≥ than 3 out of 4.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active tDCS
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes. Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes. Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the primary motor cortex delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes
Anodal tDCS will be placed over the primary motor cortex and delivered at 2mA for 20 minutes. Immediately after stimulation ceases, participants will continue with unilateral repetitive arm and finger exercises for 60 minutes. Exercise difficulty will gradually be increased and adjusted per participant's tolerance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: Baseline
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
Baseline
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
2 weeks
Arm and Hand Function as Assessed by Score on the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) assesses the integration of sensorimotor hand and upper limb impairment and function. GRASSP total score will be reported, and it ranges from 0 to 116, with a higher score indicating a higher level of arm and hand function.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Sessions Participants Attended
Time Frame: Treatment Day 1- Day 10
Treatment Day 1- Day 10
Adherence With the Therapy as Assessed by the Number of Participant Drop-outs
Time Frame: Between enrollment and 6 weeks
Between enrollment and 6 weeks
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Usefulness of the Intervention as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
Participants rated the usefulness of the interventions on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not useful at all and 10 indicating very useful.
Day 10
Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
Baseline
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
2 weeks
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Maximum force generated by hand muscles and measured with a hand-held dynamometer
6 weeks
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: Baseline
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
Baseline
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
2 weeks
Self Care as Assessed by Score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Total score on the Self Care Subscale of the Spinal Cord Injury Independence Measure (SCIM III) ranges between 0 to 20, with a higher score indicating a higher level of independence in daily functions.
6 weeks
Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks
from baseline to 6 weeks
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using tDCS as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using tDCS on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult
Day 10
Feasibility of Home Intervention as Indicated by Participants' Perceptions of Level of Difficulty of Using Exercise Equipment as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Day 10
Participants rated the level of difficulty of using exercise equipment on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating not difficult at all and 10 indicating very difficult.
Day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nuray Yozbatiran, PhD, PT, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe