Surgery for Masaoka-Koga I-II Thymoma

September 16, 2022 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Comparison of Safety and Perioperative Outcomes of Subxiphoid Approach Versus Lateral Intercostal Approach Thoracoscopic Thymectomy for Masaoka-Koga I-II Thymoma: A Prospective, Open, Multi-center, Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and perioperative outcomes of the subxiphoid approach versus the lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy for Masaoka-Koga I-II thymoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is a multi-center, open, prospective randomized phase II&III clinical trial sponsored by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital with other four hospitals in China participating in. 100 patients with thymoma (Masaoka-Koga I-II ) diagnosed by enhanced computed tomography were recruited and randomly assigned into the subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy (SATT group) and the lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy (LATT group) according to the proportion of 1:1. The safety and perioperative outcomes are compared between the two surgical regimens.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Thymoma was diagnosed by chest enhanced CT (clinical stage: Masaoka Koga I-II);
  2. The patients whose tumor diameter was <6 cm;
  3. The patients with age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years old, the estimated survival time should be over 12 months;
  4. ASA grade:1-2;
  5. The patients should have no functional disorders in main organs.;
  6. The patients should be able to understand our research and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Imaging examination showed that the tumor had invasion of surrounding organs, pleural or pericardial dissemination, lymphatic or hematogenous metastasis;
  2. Patients with myasthenia gravis;
  3. Patients had undergone a sternotomy;
  4. The patients have proved history of congestive heart failure, angina without good control with medicine; ECG-proved penetrating myocardial infarction; hypertension with bad control; valvulopathy with clinical significance; arrhythmia with high risk and out of control;
  5. The patients have severe systematic intercurrent disease, such as active infection or poorly controlled diabetes; coagulation disorders; hemorrhagic tendency or under treatment of thrombolysis or anticoagulant therapy;
  6. Female who is positive for serum pregnancy test or during lactation period;
  7. The patients have history of organ transplantation (including autologous bone marrow transplantation and peripheral stem cell transplantation;
  8. The patients have history of peripheral nerve system disorders, obvious mental disorders or central nerve system disorders;
  9. The patients attend other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy
The subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy is performed in enrolled patients.
A 2-cm straight incision was made in the middle of the xiphoid process, the incision was used as a thoracoscope hole, and the xiphoid process could be removed if necessary. The surgeon used the oval forceps to release the left and right soft tissue gaps behind the sternum, from the anterior mediastinum tunnel. Two 0.5 cm extrapleural thoracic ports under the bilateral costal arches were created, and this incision was used as an operation hole. The thread puncture cone with a diameter of 0.5 cm was placed under the guidance of the finger.
Other Names:
  • SATT
Active Comparator: the lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy
The lateral intercostal approach thoracoscopic thymectomy is performed in enrolled patients.

Right-side approach: Use the left supine position. The observing port was created at the right axillary midline line in the fourth intercostal space, and the other two ports were made as to the operation hole along the anterior axillary lines in the third and fifth intercostal spaces.

Left-side approach: Use the right supine position. The observing port was created at the left axillary midline line in the fourth intercostal space, and the other two ports were made as to the operation hole along the anterior axillary lines in the third and fifth intercostal spaces.

Other Names:
  • LATT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dosage of analgesic medication after surgery
Time Frame: Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days
The dosage of postoperative analgesic medication was the sum of the dosage of analgesics used for managing the pain of the patient after surgery. The analgesic medication includes analgesics in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCIA), injections, and oral medication.
Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days
Visual Analog Scales scores for postoperative pain
Time Frame: Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days

The postoperative pain was evaluated for every enrolled patient by using the Visual Analog Scales (VAS).

VAS: it typically asks a patient to place a mark on a line indicating the level of pain from 0 to 10. Zero indicates the absence of pain, while 10 represents the most intense pain possible.

Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days
Postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to the date of meeting the criteria of hospital discharge since the data of surgery, up to 1 month

Postoperative hospital stay is the duration for every enrolled patient until the date of meeting the criteria of hospital discharge since the date of surgery.

The criteria of hospital discharge were defined as with the volume of postoperative drainage < 200 ml/day, a normal chest X-ray, and good physical condition.

Up to the date of meeting the criteria of hospital discharge since the data of surgery, up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: The duration until the finish of surgery since the start of the surgery, up to 5 hours
Operative time was defined as the time between the start of the surgery (incision) and the finish of surgery (closure of the skin).
The duration until the finish of surgery since the start of the surgery, up to 5 hours
Perioperative blood loss
Time Frame: The duration until the finish of surgery since the start of the surgery, up to 5 hours
The volume of bleeding during the surgery.
The duration until the finish of surgery since the start of the surgery, up to 5 hours
Rate of conversion to open thoracotomy
Time Frame: Up to the end of follow-up since the date of randomization, up to 6 months.
It was the proportion of operations with unplanned conversion to thoracotomy in total operations in every group. The formula: Number (operations with unplanned conversion to thoracotomy in every group) / 50 * 100%.
Up to the end of follow-up since the date of randomization, up to 6 months.
Volume of postoperative drainage
Time Frame: Up to the date of removal of drainage equipment since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days
The volume of postoperative drainage of the patient was the sum of his daily drainage volume after the surgery. The types of drainage equipment include the thorax close drainage equipment and the unidirectional negative-pressure drainage ball.
Up to the date of removal of drainage equipment since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days
Postoperative treatment-related complications
Time Frame: Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days.
Number and severity of adverse events that are related to the treatment of each patient. Postoperative treatment-related complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo Classification. Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.
Up to the date of hospital discharge since the data of completion of surgery, up to 7 days.
Chronic postsurgical pain
Time Frame: Up to the end of follow-up since the date of hospital discharge, up to 6 months.

An updated definition of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) was proposed by Werner and Kongsgaard in 2014.

The proposed definition of CPSP was "pain persisting at least three months after surgery, that was not present before surgery, or that had different characteristics or increased intensity from preoperative pain, localized to the surgical site or a referred area, and other possible causes of the pain were excluded (e.g., cancer recurrence, infection)".

Up to the end of follow-up since the date of hospital discharge, up to 6 months.
EORTC QLQ-C30 score for overall quality of life
Time Frame: Up to the end of follow-up since the date of randomization, up to 6 months.

Overall quality of life is respectively evaluated at randomization and 1 month, 3 month, 6 month after surgery among patients by using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 Scale (EORTC QLQ-C30) (V3.0).

The minimum value of EORTC QLQ-C30 score was 0,and the maximum was 100. Zero indicates the worst quality of life, while 100 represents the best quality of life.

Up to the end of follow-up since the date of randomization, up to 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

According to the regulations on the management of human genetic resources of the People's Republic of China, we will not be able to share Individual Participant Data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thymoma

Clinical Trials on the subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy

Subscribe