Comparison of the Modified and Conventional Approach of Radial Artery Cannulation Under Short-axis Ultrasound Guidance in ICU Hypotensive Patients.

April 30, 2021 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Comparison of the Modified Approach and Conventional Approach of Radial Artery Cannulation Under Short-axis Ultrasound Guidance in Intensive Care Unit(ICU) Hypotensive Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Radial artery cannulation can be performed under short-axis ultrasound guidance. However, the first puncture success rate was low in patients with hypotensive patients. Compared with the conventional approach, the modified approach combined the ultrasonic location system with a dynamic needle tip positioning technique. The aim of our study is to compare the first puncture success rate and safety between the two approaches of ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in hypotensive ICU patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypotensive patients in the intensive care unit may have extremely unstable hemodynamics. Blood pressure is the most important outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of shock. Vasopressor drugs are often required to maintain blood pressure in addition to fluid infusion. Noninvasive blood pressure measurement is unable to meet the clinical requirements. It is necessary to establish an invasive blood pressure monitoring method as soon as possible that can observe the real-time pressure. Radial artery cannulation has become the most commonly used due to its superficial location and less severe complication. However, radial artery cannulation is difficult to achieve in hypotensive patients due to weak radial artery pulsation, small arterial diameter, and peripheral vasospasm as blood flow is directed toward central vessels.

Some studies have shown that ultrasound-guided cannulation is more successful than the palpation technique. However, the success rate is largely dependent on the ultrasound operator's experience and skills. The operator requires good hand-eye coordination, technical skills, and some experience to overcome this shortcoming of ultrasound, which limits the advantages of ultrasound-guided vascular puncture, especially for operators with insufficient experience. There are 2 basic approaches in needling techniques: short-axis out-of-plane(SA-OOP) and long-axis in-plane(LA-IP) techniques.

In-plane technology requires the operator to be very skilled at ultrasound technology, which is more dependent on experience and can be difficult for novices to master; on the other hand, given that the long axis is subject to slice-thickness artifacts, due to the measurable thickness of the ultrasound beam itself, the cannula in the long axis appears to be in the same plane as the extremely small radial artery, even when the cannula has not been successfully inserted into the artery. Therefore, we prefer the out-of-plane technique.

The short-axis view has the advantages of providing better visualization of the surrounding structures and easier imaging which is convenient for novices to master. The procedure of radial artery puncture can be divided into 3 steps. The first step is to locate the puncture site, the second step is the puncture, and the last step entails the insertion of the cannula into the radial artery.

The first step is particularly important because appropriate localization facilitates the success of the puncture and insertion. The first difficulty encountered during radial artery puncture is the exact positioning of the puncture point. Ultrasound with developing lines guided by dynamic ultrasound has achieved a good effect in patients without hypotension. In the group with the modified technique, we use the developing line to locate the puncture site.

The second difficulty encountered during radial artery puncture is the risk of posterior wall penetration. With the dynamic needle tip positioning(DNTP) technique, the operator keeps real-time track of the position of the needle tip at all times which significantly reduces the chance of posterior wall perforation. We combined the developing line and DNTP technique in the modified group and assume that the technique theoretically increases the success rate and decreases the complication rate of radial artery puncture. Therefore, in this trial, we compared the success rate of radial artery puncture using the traditional method and modified technique in hypotensive ICU patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in intensive care units;
  • The need for invasive hemodynamic monitoring (arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring);
  • The need for frequent blood sampling (arterial blood gas analysis and general laboratory evaluation);
  • Vasopressor therapy;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a negative Allen test;
  • ulnar artery occlusion;
  • prevalent atherosclerosis;
  • a blocked or embolized target vessel determined by ultrasound assessment;
  • Raynaud disease;
  • infection near the radial artery puncture site;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The modified approach
The first three attempts via the modified approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.
The first three attempts via the modified approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.
Placebo Comparator: The conventional approach
The first three attempts via the conventional approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.
The conventional approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First-pass success
Time Frame: approximately 3 minutes
successful catheterization on the first attempt
approximately 3 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall success
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
successful catheterization without a limit on the number of punctures.
within 10 minutes
The cannulation time
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
the interval between skin contact with the probe and confirmation of the arterial waveform on the monitor.
within 10 minutes
Posterior wall puncture
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
the operator saw the needle passing the posterior wall or blood backflow appeared then disappeared while needle advancing.
within 10 minutes
the number of attempts
Time Frame: within 10 minutes
the number of attempts until successful cannulation
within 10 minutes
Complication rate
Time Frame: Day 1
bleeding, hematoma,thrombosis, vasospasm, occlusion, aneurysm
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guowei Tu, PhD, Fudan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radial Artery Catheterization

Clinical Trials on The modified approach

3
Subscribe